Page 53 - AN-3-4
P. 53

Advanced Neurology                                                       Cognition in children with mild TBI



            1. Introduction                                    2.1.1. Inclusion criteria

            Traumatic brain injury (TBI) annually affects >3,000,000   All articles published in English that focused on neurocognitive
            children worldwide  and is the leading cause of death and   and psychological assessments of children aged 0 – 18 years
                           1
            disability in the pediatric age group.  Although most   with a history of mTBI (defined as a Glasgow coma scale
                                           2-4
                                                                             11
            children with TBI achieve full recovery, some of them   [GCS] score of >8)  were included in the analysis. Narrative
            with mild TBI (mTBI) or severe TBI may experience   reviews, opinion and clinical commentary articles, and single
            a combination of cognitive, behavioral, and emotional   case reports were excluded. First, the titles and abstracts of
            sequelae.   Consistently,  a  small  number  of  mildly   the articles were screened. Duplicates and articles with no
                   5,6
            injured patients experience chronic physical, cognitive,   available English summary were excluded. Articles reporting
            and emotional impairments.  This condition, known as   information on both children and adults were included only
                                   7
            persistent postconcussive symptoms (PCS), is related to   if pediatric data could be retrieved and extracted. Similarly,
            reduced quality of life,  challenges at school,  and poorer   studies on different types of TBI were included only if the data
                              8
                                                9
            long-term psychological and behavioral outcomes. 10  of patients with mTBI could be separated. Two researchers
                                                               (I.L. and T.Z.) independently performed the literature search
              TBI management in acute settings has been        and screening of eligible studies.
            extensively reported in several national and international
            guidelines. 11-14  However, there is no consensus regarding   2.1.2. Data extraction
            the  recommendations  for  neuroradiological  and  We developed a standardized  grid to  collect the extracted
            cognitive follow-up of these patients. Furthermore, all   data. The following data were collected: first author name,
            published studies have demonstrated a high variation in   date and journal of publication, country of study, study design
            neuropsychological domains and TBI severity. 15-19  The   (prospective, retrospective, or case–control), sample size,
            current study findings also suggested that these patients   age (mean or median and range), outcome measures, main
            experienced deficits mainly in linguistic abilities and   results, and conclusions. The data were organized into tables
                                            15
            communication, 20,21  psychomotor skills,  and attentional   to easily compare the characteristics of the included studies.
            capacity and executive functions. 22
              This study aimed to review the current evidence on the   2.2. Monocentric cohort study
            follow-up of children with mTBI to provide a systematic   2.2.1. Participants
            and comprehensive overview of integrating extensive
            neuropsychological and neuroradiological evaluations   Children  aged 4 – 16  (median, 9)  years who were
            as part of the long-term management of these patients.   evaluated for TBI at our institution between March 2017
            Furthermore, we described the clinical and neurocognitive   and September 2018 were retrospectively enrolled in this
            aspects of  a  group  of  Italian  children  with  a  history  of   study. We intentionally analyzed the data of children who
            mTBI by studying their development over time.      had been followed-up before the COVID-19 pandemic
                                                               to avoid potentially confounding factors. Data regarding
            2. Materials and methods                           anthropometric  and  demographic  characteristics,
                                                               comorbidities, mechanism of injury, GCS, and clinical
            2.1. Literature review                             symptoms at baseline evaluation (T0), clinical data related
            We conducted a systematic review in compliance with the   to admission (e.g. labs report, complications report,
            Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and   diagnostic test), and length of stay were collected.
            Meta-analyses guidelines. 23,24  An electronic search was   The inclusion criteria were as follows: (a) availability of
            conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar databases   head computed tomography (CT) at baseline, (b) complete
            to identify articles published in English between January   neuropsychological  evaluation,  and  (c)  good  knowledge
            1, 2012, and January 1, 2024. The following search terms   of Italian language. The exclusion criteria were as follows:
            were used: TBI AND/OR head trauma AND/OR brain     (a)  pre-existing neurological comorbidity or  a former
            injury AND/OR brain trauma AND/OR post-concussive   diagnosis of neuropsychiatric disorder and (b) parent’s
            syndrome  AND  children  AND/OR  pediatric  AND/OR   refusal to provide informed consent. The follow-up, mainly
            youth AND/OR adolescent AND psychosocial AND/OR    focused on neurocognitive assessments, was performed
            cognitive AND/OR psychological AND/OR psychiatric.   according to our clinical practice. Neurocognitive
            The  reference  list  of  each  article  was  also  reviewed  to   assessments were performed at the following time points:
            identify possible missing studies, and those eligible for the   baseline (T0),  i.e., within 7  days after the event; T1,  i.e.,
            screening process were evaluated according to inclusion   6 months after the event; and T2, i.e., 18 – 24 months after
            criteria.                                          the event.


            Volume 3 Issue 4 (2024)                         2                                doi: 10.36922/an.3886
   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58