Page 54 - AN-3-4
P. 54

Advanced Neurology                                                       Cognition in children with mild TBI



              All participants were individually evaluated over   Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI-III).  The WISC-IV
                                                                                                 28
            2 – 3 sessions, each lasting approximately 30 – 45  min,   (or WPPSI-III) was administered during T1 and T2
            on different days at intervals of <1  week. The timing of   evaluations. The FSIQ scores from WISC-IV and WPPSI-
            neuroradiological  examinations  (magnetic  resonance   III were combined for the analyses.
            imaging [MRI]) was not standardized. However, they were
            usually performed on the basis of the clinical status and   2.3.3. Emotional and behavioral assessment
            close to the T0 or T1 neuropsychological evaluations.  The emotional and behavioral aspects of the patients were
                                                                                                         29
              The study was approved by the local Institutional   assessed using the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL).  The
            Review Board (approval no.: CEUR-2020-OS-265), and   CBCL is a standardized tool that provides a parental report
            written informed consent was obtained from the parents   of emotional, social, and behavioral problems in children
                                                               aged 6 – 18 years. The questionnaire comprises 113 items.
            of all enrolled children.
                                                               Each item is scored using a three-point Likert scale (0 =
            2.3. Assessment                                    “not  true,”  1 =  “somewhat  or  sometimes  true,”  and 2  =
                                                               “very true or often true”). The total score is derived from
            2.3.1. Neuropsychological assessment               several subscales, including internalizing aspects (e.g.,
            Patients underwent neuropsychological evaluation using   anxiety/depression, withdrawal, and somatic complaints)
            the Italian version of the Developmental Neuropsychology   and externalizing aspects (e.g., attention problems, rule-
            Assessment II Edition (NEPSY-II). 25,26  NEPSY-II is an age-  breaking, and aggressive behavior) together with social
            based flexible instrument; some items can be administered   problems and thoughts problems scales. For the subscales
            to all age groups, whereas others are age specific. We chose   of “internalizing,” “externalizing,” and “total” issues, a
            to include only tasks administered to all children in the   t-score of ≤59 indicates nonclinical symptoms, a t-score of
            final analysis. As the NEPSY item “language function” was   60 – 64 indicates a risk of behavioral issues, and a t-score of
            assessed via other tests according to the age of patients, it   ≥65 indicates clinical symptoms.
            was excluded from the analysis.                      The CBCL was administered during T0 (related to
              The following domains were explored:             pre-morbid functioning) and T1 evaluations. Analysis of
            •   Attention and executive functioning: visual attention,   CBCL data was limited to patients aged 6 – 16 years.
               graphic fluency, auditory attention and response set,   2.3.4. MRI and CT data acquisition
               inhibition, clocks, and animal sorting
            •   Memory and learning: memory for faces, word    Standard  head  CT was  obtained  for  all  children.  MRI
               list  interference,  memory for  designs,  list memory,   was performed for specific clinical reasons using a 1.5 T
               memory for names, narrative memory, and sentence   scanner (Magnetom Area, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany).
               repetition                                      The MRI protocol included conventional MRI and 3D
            •   Sensorimotor functions: fingertip tapping, imitating   reconstruction of T1-weighted images. The following
               hand positions, and manual motor sequence       parameters were selected for each sequence: T1-weighted
            •   Social perception: theory of mind and affect   (repetition time/time to echo [TR/TE] = 500/17 ms, 19
               recognition                                     slices, thickness = 4 mm, field of view [FOV] = 180 mm,
            •   Visuospatial processing: design copying,  block   matrix  size  =  256), T2-weighted  (TR/TE  =  4000/86 ms,
               construction,  picture  and  geometric  puzzles,  route   20 slices, thickness = 4 mm, FOV = 200 mm, matrix size
                                                               = 320), fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (TR/TE =
               finding, and arrows.
                                                               8500/81 ms, 20 slices, thickness = 4 mm, FOV = 200 mm,
              The results of the NEPSY-II evaluation were expressed   matrix size = 320), and volumetric T1-weighted (TR/TE
            as age-adjusted scaled scores and compared with the   = 2200/3.02 ms, 240 slices, thickness = 1 mm, FOV = 250,
            normative reference values (mean = 10; standard deviation   matrix size = 256).
                   25
            [SD] = 3).  NEPSY-II was administered during T1 (attention
            and executive functioning as well as memory and learning   2.4. Statistical analysis
            domains) and T2 (complete assessment) evaluations.  Descriptive analysis was performed to characterize the
                                                               study population. Continuous variables were expressed as
            2.3.2. Cognitive assessment
                                                               mean and SD or median with interquartile range (IQR),
            The full-scale intelligence quotient (FSIQ) was assessed in   as appropriate. Categorical variables were expressed as
            patients aged 6 – 16 years using the Wechsler Intelligence   percentages or frequencies. All variables were analyzed
            Scale  for  Children  IV  Edition  (WISC-IV)   and  in   for normality distribution (D’Agostino–Pearson omnibus
                                                  27
            patients aged <6 years using the Wechsler Preschool and   normality  test).  Differences  between  evaluations

            Volume 3 Issue 4 (2024)                         3                                doi: 10.36922/an.3886
   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59