Page 50 - ARNM-1-2
P. 50

Advances in Radiotherapy
            & Nuclear Medicine                                               SUVmax relating to patient and tumor factors



               ovarian cancer via SUVmax value. Jpn J Radiol, 36: 544–550.     https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.06.129
               https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-018-0755-y       17.  Downey RJ, Akhurst T, Gonen M, et al., 2007, Fluorine-18
            11.  Shijun Z, Ning W, Rong Z, et al., 2013, Relationship between   fluorodeoxyglucose  positron  emission  tomographic
               SUVmax of 18FDG PET and clinicopathological features of   maximal  standardized  uptake  value  predicts  survival
               nonsmall cell lung cancer. Chin J Oncol, 35: 754–757.  independent of clinical but not pathologic TNM staging
                                                                  of resected non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc
            12.  Nakamura K, Kodama J, Okumura Y,  et al., 2010, The   Surg, 133: 1419–1127.
               SUVmax of  FFDG PET correlates with histological grade
                        18
               in endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 20: 110–115.     https://doi.org/0.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.01.041
               https://doi.org/10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181c3a288    18.  Kwon W, Howard BA, Herndon JE, et al., 2015, FDG uptake
                                                                  on positron emission tomography correlates with survival
            13.  Kitajima K, Kita M, Suzuki K, et al., 2012, Prognostic   and time to recurrence in patients with stage I non-small-
               significance of SUVmax (maximum standardized uptake   cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol, 10: 897–902.
               value) measured by [18F] FDG PET/CT in endometrial
               cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 39: 840–845.     https://doi.org/10.1097/JTO.0000000000000534
               https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-011-2057-9       19.  Agarwal M, Brahmanday G, Bajaj SK, et al., 2010, Revisiting
                                                                  the prognostic value of preoperative 18F-fluoro-2-
            14.  Dylan J, Hazem A, David G, et al., 2013, Histological grade/  deoxyglucose ( F-FDG) positron emission tomography
                                                                              18
               differentiation and  FFDG PET/CT in oesophageal cancer.   (PET) in early-stage (I and II) non-small cell lung cancers
                             18
               Gastroenterol, 144: S515–S519.
                                                                  (NSCLC). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 37: 691–698.
            15.  Chen  Q,  Xue  Zhen  M,  2009,  Relationship  between      https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-009-1291-x
               uptake values of  FFDG PET/CT standard and NSCLC
                             18
               clinicopathological factors. J Qilu Med, 24: 104–105.  20.  Hoang JK, Hoagland LF, Coleman RE, et al., 2008, Prognostic
                                                                  value of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission
            16.  Sasaki R, Komaki R, Macapinlac H,  et al., 2005, [18F]
               fluorodeoxyglucose  uptake  by  positron  emission  tomography imaging in patients with advanced-stage non-
               tomography predicts outcome of non-small-cell lung cancer.   small-cell lung carcinoma. J Clin Oncol, 26: 1459–1464.
               J Clin Oncol, 23: 1136–1143.                       https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.14.3628










































            Volume 1 Issue 2 (2024)                         8                       https://doi.org/10.36922/arnm.2032
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55