Page 26 - ARNM-2-1
P. 26

Advances in Radiotherapy
            & Nuclear Medicine                                             Is 5-mm PTV margin 4D-CT-based radiotherapy



            (81%). This result implies that in 19% of the patients, the   due to tumor or nodal movements during the respiratory
            volumes were not at the same anatomical position. Such   cycle. DIC has a median value of 0.8 (range: 0.75 – 0.87).
            deviations indicate the likelihood of PTV displacement   For the purpose of our study, we created two radiotherapy

                                                               plans based on FBCT-based volume and another based
            Table 2. Comparison of treatment volumes between two   on 4D-CT-based volume using similar geometry, gantry
            planning datasets
                                                               angles  or  arcs,  and  other  radiotherapy  planning  and
            Parameter  No. of    Mean     Standard   P‑value   optimization parameters. All study patients received
                      patients  volume (cc)  deviation         IMRT with plans generated using 4D-CT-based volumes.
            GTV_3D      50       171.55    134.42   <0.0001    For study purposes, FBCT-based plans were copied onto
            IGTV_4D     50       187.22    134.42              the 4D-CT volume dataset and vice versa. The mean
            GTVP_3D     50       156.52    139.81   <0.0001    95%  coverage  of  the  FBCT-based  PTV  (PTVD  95_4D)
            IGTVP_4D    50       168.69    141.15              by the 4DCT-based plan was 76.47% (median  =  76.8%,
                                                               range = 65.4 – 87.1%). The mean 95% coverage of the
            GTVN_3D     50       15.16     26.78    <0.0001    4D-CT-based PTV (PTVD 95_3D) by the FBCT-based
            IGTVN_4D    50       18.89     31.93               plan was 97.77% (median = 99.5%, range = 81 – 100%).
            PTV_3D      50       781.67    336.58   <0.0001    This suggests that the plan generated based on the
            PTV_4D      50       539.39    243.07              FBCT-based volume was sufficiently large to ensure 95%
            Abbreviations: GTV: Gross tumor volume; PTV: Planning target volume.  coverage of the 4D-CT-based volume. However, this leads

            Table 3. Comparison of organ at risk doses between two planning datasets

            Parameter                    Planning     No. of     Mean      Standard     Percentage     P‑value
                                         dataset     patients              deviation    decline with
                                                                                          4D‑CT
            Lung-V20 (%)                   3D          50        27.05        6.7           9          <0.0001
                                           4D          50        23.73        5.9
            Lung-V10 (%)                   3D          50        38.85       12.48         12.6        <0.0001
                                           4D          50        33.97       10.03
            Lung-V5 (%)                    3D          50        53.07       16.6          10.2        <0.0001
                                           4D          50        47.64       14.4
            Mean lung dose (Gy)            3D          50        15.08       4.45          13.2        <0.0001
                                           4D          50        13.09       3.85
            Heart-V60 (%)                  3D          50         4.04       4.25          50          <0.0001
                                           4D          50         2.02       2.21
            Heart-V45 (%)                  3D          50        12.33       9.56          39.9        <0.0001
                                           4D          50         7.41       5.49
            Heart-V40 (%)                  3D          50        14.33       10.64         35.4        <0.0001
                                           4D          50         9.26       6.62
            Mean heart dose (Gy)           3D          50        14.62       8.66          20.4        <0.0001
                                           4D          50        11.64       7.04
            Oesophagus-V60 (%)             3D          50         5.15       6.53         18.05         0.154
                                           4D          50         4.22       5.08
            Oesophagus- mean dose (Gy)     3D          50        21.15       11.64         12.5        <0.0001
                                           4D          50        18.50       10.35
            Spinal cord-max dose (Gy)      3D          50        37.39       8.93          4.8         <0.0001
                                           4D          50        35.59       8.05
            Spinal cord PRV (dose to 1 cc) (Gy)  3D    50        37.90       9.17          6.6         <0.0001
                                           4D          50        35.37       8.15
            Abbreviations: PRV: Planning risk volume; 4D-CT: 4D-computed tomography.

            Volume 2 Issue 1 (2024)                         5                       https://doi.org/10.36922/arnm.2784
   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31