Page 67 - ARNM-3-2

Advances in Radiotherapy
& Nuclear Medicine 18 F-FDG uptake and hypercholesterolemia

Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43(4):780-792. Cancer Imaging. 2012;12(1):283-289.
doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3259-3 doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2012.0033
26. Caselles V, Kimmel R, Sapiro G. Geodesic active contours. 38. Cai D, He Y, Yu H, Zhang Y, Shi H. Comparative benefits
Int J Comput Vision. 1997;22:61-79. of Ki and SUV images in lesion detection during PET/CT
imaging. EJNMMI Res. 2024;14(1):98.
doi: 10.1109/ICCV.1995.466871
doi: 10.1186/s13550-024-01162-x
27. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, Zusmer NR,
Viamonte M Jr., Detrano R. Quantification of coronary 39. Bertoglio D, Deleye S, Miranda A, Stroobants S, Staelens
artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am S, Verhaeghe J. Estimation of the net influx rate K and the
i
Coll Cardiol. 1990;15(4):827-832. cerebral metabolic rate of glucose MR using a single static
glc
[ F]FDG PET scan in rats. Neuroimage. 2021;233:117961.
18
doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(90)90282-t
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117961
28. Ohya M, Otani H, Kimura K, et al. Vascular calcification
estimated by aortic calcification area index is a significant 40. Wang R, Chen H, Fan C. Impacts of time interval on 18F-
predictive parameter of cardiovascular mortality in FDG uptake for PET/CT in normal organs: A systematic
hemodialysis patients. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2011;15(6):877-883. review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(45):e13122.
doi: 10.1007/s10157-011-0517-y doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013122
29. Rousset OG, Ma Y, Evans AC. Correction for partial 41. Chen W, Dilsizian V. PET assessment of vascular
volume effects in PET: Principle and validation. J Nucl Med. inflammation and atherosclerotic plaques: SUV or TBR? J
1998;39(5):904-911. Nucl Med. 2015;56(4):503-504.
30. Burger C, Buck A. Requirements and implementation doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.154385
of a flexible kinetic modeling tool. J Nucl Med. 42. Yun M, Jang S, Cucchiara A, Newberg AB, Alavi A. 18F FDG
1997;38(11):1818-1823. uptake in the large arteries: A correlation study with the
31. Guo N, Lang L, Gao H, et al. Quantitative analysis and atherogenic risk factors. Semin Nucl Med. 2002;32(1):70-76.
parametric imaging of F-labeled monomeric and dimeric doi: 10.1053/snuc.2002.29279
18
RGD peptides using compartment model. Mol Imaging Biol.
2012;14(6):743-752. 43. Tatsumi M, Cohade C, Nakamoto Y, Wahl RL.
Fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the aortic wall at PET/
doi: 10.1007/s11307-012-0541-7 CT: Possible finding for active atherosclerosis. Radiology.
32. Graham MM, Muzi M, Spence AM, et al. The FDG 2003;229(3):831-837.
lumped constant in normal human brain. J Nucl Med. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2293021168
2002;43(9):1157-1166.
44. Ben-Haim S, Kupzov E, Tamir A, Israel O. Evaluation of
33. Al-Enezi MS, Bentourkia M. Kinetic modeling of dynamic 18F-FDG uptake and arterial wall calcifications using 18F-
PET- F-FDG atherosclerosis without blood sampling. IEEE FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2004;45(11):1816-1821.
18
Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci. 2020;4(6):729-734.
45. Santos RD. Calcified and noncalcified coronary plaques
doi: 10.1109/TRPMS.2020.3005364 and atherosclerotic cardiovascular events in patients
34. Galli G, Indovina L, Calcagni ML, Mansi L, Giordano A. The with severe hypercholesterolemia-moving forward
quantification with FDG as seen by a physician. Nucl Med with risk stratification and therapy. JAMA Netw Open.
Biol. 2013;40(6):720-730. 2022;5(2):e2148147.

doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2013.06.009 doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.48147
35. Torizuka T, Nobezawa S, Momiki S, et al. Short dynamic 46. Cahalane R, Akyildiz A, Kavousi M, et al. Cross-sectional
FDG-PET imaging protocol for patients with lung cancer. validation of a novel computed tomography-based carotid
Eur J Nucl Med. 2000;27(10):1538-1542. mean calcium density measurement. J Am Heart Assoc.
2023;12(13):e027866.
doi: 10.1007/s002590000312
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.027866
36. Strauss LG, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Haberkorn U.
Shortened PET data acquisition protocol for the 47. Criqui MH, Knox JB, Denenberg JO, et al. Coronary artery
quantification of 18F-FDG kinetics. J Nucl Med. calcium volume and density: Potential interactions and overall
2003;44(12):1933-1939. predictive value: The multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10(8):845-854.
37. Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Pan L, Strauss LG. Quantitative
approaches of dynamic FDG-PET and PET/CT studies doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.04.018
(dPET/CT) for the evaluation of oncological patients. 48. Razavi AC, van Assen M, De Cecco CN, et al. Discordance

Volume 3 Issue 2 (2025) 59 doi: 10.36922/arnm.8540