Page 79 - ARNM-3-2
P. 79

Advances in Radiotherapy
            & Nuclear Medicine                                                Modeling renal TAC in dynamic scintigraphy



            Ethics approval and consent to participate            doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-8899-8-24

            Patient data were used anonymously in accordance with   9.   Grilo N, Schurch B. Renal Function Evaluation. In: Liao  L,
            local ethical guidelines. The study does not involve clinical   Madersbacher H, editors.  Handbook of Neurourology.
            trials and does not require informed consent.         Singapore: Springer; 2023.
                                                                  doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-1659-7-21
            Consent for publication                            10.  Civan C, Simsek DH, Kiran MY, et al. Comparison of 2D

            Patient data were used anonymously and do not require   planar and 3D volumetric methods for estimation of split
            consent for publication.                              renal function by 99mTc-DMSA scintigraphy.  Phys Med.
                                                                  2022;95:83-88.
            Availability of data                                  doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.01.010
            The data are not publicly available.               11.  Reichkendler MH, Berg RMG, De Nijs R, Nørgaard H,
                                                                  Schmidt IM, Borgwardt L. Planar scan vs. SPECT/low-
            References                                            dose CT for estimating split renal function by  99m Tc-DMSA
            1.   Alsabea H. Type of renal scintigraphy. J Nucl Med Radiat   scintigraphy in children.  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging.
               Ther. 2017;8(6):347.                               2020;47(3):729-733.
               doi: 10.4172/2155-9619.1000347                     doi: 10.1007/s00259-019-04575-2
            2.   Esser JP. Dynamic Renal Scintigraphy (Part I). Amersfoort:   12.  Orrico M, Cosma L, Ricci M,  et al. Early renal function
               Meander Medical Centre; 2014.                      alterations in  renal  branches  vs.  Renal  fenestrations  -  a
                                                                  dynamic scintigraphy based prospective study.  Eur J Vasc
            3.   Tyagi N, Pandey A, Parihar A, et al. Analysis of the efficacy   Endovasc Surg. 2020;60(3):395-401.
               of elastography in comparison with dynamic renal nuclear
               scintigraphy in the evaluation of unilateral pelvie-ureteric      doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.05.023
               junction obstruction. J Pediatr Surg. 2024;59:605-609.  13.  Taylor AT. Radionuclides in nephrourology, part  1:
               doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2023.11.017                Radiopharmaceuticals, quality control, and quantitative
                                                                  indices. J Nucl Med. 2014;55(4):608-615.
            4.   Volkan-Salanci  B,  Erbas  B.  Diuretic  renal  scintigraphy  in
               adults: Practical aspects and reporting.  Semin Nucl Med.      doi: 10.2967/jnumed.113.133447
               2021;52:445-452.                                14.  Kersting D, Sraieb M, Seifert R, et al. First experiences with
                                                                              68]
               doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2021.12.006              dynamic renal [ Ga]Ga-DOTA PET/CT: A comparison to
                                                                  renal scintigraphy and compartmental modelling to non-
            5.   Nilsson JN, Elovsson R, Thor D, Calissendorff J,   invasively estimate the glomerular filtration rate. Eur J Nucl
               Ardenfors O. Radioiodine treatment outcome by dosimetric   Med Mol Imaging. 2022;49:3373-3386.
               parameters and renal function in hyperthyroidism. Thyroid
               Res. 2022;15:8.                                    doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-05781-1
               doi: 10.1186/s13044-022-00126-4                 15.  Murray AW, Barnfield MC, Waller ML, Telford T, Peters AM.
                                                                  Assessment of glomerular filtration rate measurement with
            6.   François H, Richardson A, Boubaker A, et al. Dynamic Renal   plasma sampling: A technical review. J Nucl Med Technol.
               Imaging in Obstructive Renal Pathology a Technologist’s   2013;41(2):67-75.
               Guide. Austria: European Association Nuclear Medicine;
               2009. p. 1-23.                                     doi: 10.2967/jnmt.113.121004
                                                               16.  Rahimi A, Hosntalab M, Babapour Mofrad F, Amoui  M,
               doi: 10.52717/NAYK4703
                                                                  Bagci U. An automatic segmentation framework for
            7.   Grzegorz Filipczak K, Cichocki P, Kusmierek J,   computer-assisted renal scintigraphy  procedure.  Med Biol
               Plachcinska  A.  Kidney  efficiency  index  -  quantitative   Eng Comput. 2023;61:285-295.
               parameter of a dynamic renal scintigraphy. I. Theory and
               preliminary verification. Nucl Med Rev. 2020;23(2):78-83.     doi: 10.1007/s11517-022-02717-7
               doi: 10.5603/NMR.2020.0025                      17.  Aggarwal P, Gunasekaran V, Gowtham M, et al. Assessment
                                                                  of post-pyeloplasty renal drainage in antenatally detected
            8.   Wu R, Huang D, Wang Z, et al. The Application of Renal   hydronephrosis by   99]m Tc-L, L-Ethylenedicysteine renal
               Dynamic Imaging in Measuring Renal Function of     scintigraphy: The importance of delayed imaging. Ann Nucl
               En-Bloc Pediatric Kidneys Transplanted into Recipients.   Med. 2024;39:266-272.
               In: Liu  C, editors.  Proceedings of the 23   Pacific Basin
                                               rd
               Nuclear Conference. Springer Proceedings in Physics. Vol. 3.      doi: 10.1007/s12149-024-01994-6
               Singapore: Springer; 2023. 233-245.             18.  Zheng X, Wei W, Huang Q, Song S, Huang G. Automated


            Volume 3 Issue 2 (2025)                         71                        doi: 10.36922/ARNM025070008
   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84