Page 98 - ARNM-3-2
P. 98

Advances in Radiotherapy
            & Nuclear Medicine                                             Influence of photon beam quality in radiotherapy



            Formal analysis: Md Akhtaruzzaman                     doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/9/009.
            Investigation: Md Akhtaruzzaman                    8.   Mesbahi  A,  Zergoug  I.  Dose  calculations  for  lung
            Methodology: Md Akhtaruzzaman                         inhomogeneity in high-energy photon beams and small
            Writing–original draft: Md Akhtaruzzaman              beamlets: A comparison between XiO and TiGRT treatment
            Writing–review & editing: Pawel Kukolowicz            planning systems and MCNPX Monte Carlo code.  Iran J
                                                                  Med Phys. 2015;12(3):167-177.
            Ethics approval and consent to participate
                                                                  doi: 10.22038/ijmp.2015.6218
            This study was exempt from ethical approval from an   9.   International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Commissioning
            Institutional Review Board (IRB) or Ethics Committee of   and  Quality  Assurance  of Computerized  Planning  Systems
            National Institute of Oncology in Warsaw, Poland.     for Radiation Treatment of Cancer. Technical Report Series

            Consent for publication                               No. 430; 2004.
                                                               10.  Papanikolaou N, Battista JJ, Boyer AL,  et al.  Tissue
            Not applicable.                                       Inhomogeneity Corrections for Megavoltage Photon Beams.
            Availability of data                                  Report  of  the  AAPM  Task  Group  No.  85.  Madison,  WI:
                                                                  Medical Physics Publishing; 2004.
            The data used in this study can be obtained by contacting   11.  Hunt MA, Desobry GE, Fowble B, Coia LR. Effect of low-
            the corresponding author, Md Akhtaruzzaman, at akhzam@  density lateral interfaces on soft-tissue doses. Int J Radiat
            gmail.com and/or akhtaruzzaman@evercarebd.com         Oncol Biol Phys. 1997;37(2):475-482.

            References                                            doi: 10.1016/S0360-3016(96)00477-5
            1.   Li J, Zhang T. Implementation of convolution/superposition   12.  Stathakis S, Kappas C, Theodorou K, et al. An inhomogeneity
               model  of  photon dose calculation. In:  7   Asian-Pacific   correction algorithm for irregular fields of high-energy photon
                                               th
               Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering. 2008.   beams based on Clarkson integration and the 3D beam
               p. 442-446.                                        subtraction method. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2006;7(1):1-13.
               doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-79039-6_110                 doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v7i1.2188
            2.   Wieslander E. Verification of Dose Calculation Algorithms in   13.  Ono K, Endo S, Tanaka K,  et al. Dosimetric verification
               Treatment Planning Systems for External Radiation Therapy:   of the anisotropic analytical algorithm in lung equivalent
               A  Monte Carlo Approach [doctoral thesis]. Sweden:  Lund   heterogeneities  with  and  without  bone  equivalent
               University; 2006.                                  heterogeneities. Med Phys. 2010;37(8):4456-4463.
            3.   Robinson  D.  Inhomogeneity  correction  and the  analytic      doi: 10.1118/1.3455709
               anisotropic algorithm.  J  Appl Clin Med Phys. 2008;9(2):   14.  Akhtaruzzaman M, Kukolowicz P. Dependence of tissue
               112-122.                                           inhomogeneity correction factors on nominal photon beam
               doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v9i2.2801.                      energy. Nukleonika. 2018;63(1):3-7.
            4.   International Commission on Radiation Units and      doi: 10.1515/nuka-2018-0001
               Measurements (ICRU). Prescribing, Recording, and Reporting   15.  Gerbi BJ. A  mathematical expression for percentage
               Photon Beam Therapy. ICRU Report No 50; 1993.      depth dose accurate from Co-60 to 24 MV.  Med Phys.
            5.   International Commission on Radiation Units and   1991;18(4):724-726.
               Measurements (ICRU). Prescribing, Recording, and Reporting      doi: 10.1118/1.596695
               Photon  Beam  Therapy  (Supplement  to  ICRU  Report  50).
               ICRU Report No 62; 1999.                        16.  Podgorsak EB. Radiation Oncology Physics: A Handbook for
                                                                  Teachers and Students. Vienna: International Atomic Energy
            6.   Cheng CW, Das IJ, Tang W, et al. Dosimetric comparison   Agency (IAEA); 2005.
               of treatment planning systems in irradiation of breast
               with tangential fields. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys.   17.  Akhtaruzzaman M, Kukolowicz P. The dependence of
               1997;38(4):835-842.                                inhomogeneity correction factors on photon beam quality
                                                                  index performed with the anisotropic analytical algorithm.
               doi: 10.1016/S0360-3016(97)00048-8
                                                                  Pol J Med Phys Eng. 2020;26(3):127-134.
            7.   Paelinck L, Reynaert N, Thierens H,  et al. Experimental
               verification of lung dose with radiochromic film: Comparison      doi: 10.2478/pjmpe-2020-0016
               with Monte Carlo simulations and commercially available   18.  Wong JW, Purdy JA, Harms WB, et al. Role of inhomogeneity
               treatment planning systems.  Phys Med Biol. 2005;50(9):   corrections in three-dimensional photon treatment
               2055-2059.                                         planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1991;21(1):59-69.


            Volume 3 Issue 2 (2025)                         90                             doi: 10.36922/arnm.6851
   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103