Page 9 - ARNM-3-3
P. 9

Advances in Radiotherapy &

                                                                            Nuclear Medicine




                                        EDITORIAL
                                        Navigating promise and pitfalls: Real-world

                                        deployment of artificial intelligence in
                                        mammography



                                        Mehrshad Bakhshi*

                                        Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

                                        We aim to provide a review of the article “Nationwide Real-World Implementation of Artificial
                                        Intelligence (AI) for Cancer Detection in Population-Based Mammography Screening”
                                        published in Nature Medicine in January 2025.  This work builds on previous literature
                                                                             1
                                        concerning the use of AI in breast cancer screening. Breast cancer screening programs face
                                        numerous challenges. Notably, there is a need for improved sensitivity and specificity in
                                        diagnostic performance of mammography screening. Efficiency is another metric that could
                                        be improved, given the intensive workload requirements of these nationwide screening
                                        programs. This study aimed to compare the performance of AI-supported double reading to
                                        standard double reading, specifically focusing on breast cancer detection rate and recall rate.
                                          The study was conducted within the framework of Germany’s breast cancer screening
                                        program, which targeted women aged 50 – 69 years. In this program, mammograms
                                        were independently assessed by two radiologists. If either radiologist deemed the case
                                        suspicious, a consensus conference was held. If suspicion persisted, the patient was
                                        recalled for further investigations, often including a biopsy. This observational study
                                        had two arms. Cases were assigned to the AI arm if radiologists used an AI-supported
                                        viewer; otherwise, cases were assigned to the control group. The Vara MG AI system was
                                        used, employing a deep convolutional neural network trained and validated on a dataset
            *Corresponding author:      of over two million mammograms.
            Mehrshad Bakhshi
            (mehrshad.bakhshi@mail.mcgill.ca)  A total of 461,818 women formed the analytic sample, with 119 radiologists assessing
            Citation: Bakhshi M. Navigating   the mammograms. In terms of breast cancer detection rate, the use of the AI-supported
            promise and pitfalls: Real-world   program led to a 17.6% (95% confidence interval: 5.7 – 30.8%) higher detection rate,
            deployment of artificial intelligence   diagnosing one  extra  cancer  per 1,000  women  screened.  There was  no significant
            in mammography. Adv Radiother
            Nucl Med. 2025;3(3):1-2.    difference in recall rate between groups. However, the positive predictive values of both
            doi: 10.36922/ARNM025180019  recall and biopsy were statistically superior in the AI-assisted group.
            Received: April 28, 2025      This study represents the largest to date on the use of AI in breast cancer screening. The
            Accepted: May 7, 2025       AI decision referral approach is notable for reducing automation bias. The main finding
                                        was that the program improved cancer detection rates. However, some considerations
            Published online: May 21, 2025
                                        must be taken when interpreting these findings. It was found that the additional cancers
            Copyright: © 2025 Author(s).   detected were low-grade, raising concerns about the potential for overdiagnosis. Hence,
            This is an Open-Access article
            distributed under the terms of the   follow-up studies will be needed to clarify these issues. There were also several limitations.
            Creative Commons Attribution   The observational design limits the strength of the findings. In addition, reader behavior
            License, permitting distribution,   bias was present, as radiologists had the option to choose whether to use the AI decision
            and reproduction in any medium,
            provided the original work is   tool. Finally, we noted potential conflicts of interest. Most of the co-authors in this
            properly cited.             publication are stakeholders at the company that owns the AI model, and they also
            Publisher’s Note: AccScience   contributed significantly to the study design, data collection, and writing of the report.
            Publishing remains neutral with
            regard to jurisdictional claims in   Conflict of interest
            published maps and institutional
            affiliations.               The author declares no conflict of interest.

            Volume 3 Issue 3 (2025)                         1                         doi: 10.36922/ARNM025180019
   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14