Page 17 - DP-1-1

Design+ Designing future schools

25. Soccio P. A new post occupancy evaluation tool for assessing STEM education. Int J Artif Intell Educ. 2020;30:74-96.
the indoor environment quality of learning environments. doi: 10.1007/s40593-019-00191-1
In: Imms W, Cleveland B, Fisher K, editors. Evaluating
Learning Environments. Netherlands: Brill; 2016. p. 195-210. 39. Prain V, Cox P, Deed C, et al. Personalised learning: Lessons
to be learnt. Br Educ Res J. 2013;39(4):654-676.
26. Uline CL, Wolsey TD, Tschannen-Moran M, Lin CD.
Improving the physical and social environment of school: doi: 10.1080/01411926.2012.669748
A question of equity. J Sch Leadersh. 2010;20(5):597-632.
40. Prain V, Cox P, Deed C, et al, editors. Characterising
doi: 10.1177/105268461002000504 personalising learning. In: Personalising Learning in Open-
27. Bronfenbrenner U. Ecological Systems Theory. United States: Plan Schools. Berlin: Springer; 2015. p. 3-25.
American Psychological Association; 2000. 41. Stefanou CR, Perencevich KC, DiCintio M, Turner JC.
28. Williams MK. John Dewey in the 21 century. J Inq Action Supporting autonomy in the classroom: Ways teachers
st
Educ. 2017;9(1):7. encourage student decision making and ownership. Educ
Psychol. 2004;39(2):97-110.
29. Aldrich H. Organizations and Environments. United States:
Stanford University Press; 2008. doi: 10.1207/s1532695ep3902_2
30. Jacobson M, Wilensky U. Complex systems in education: 42. Lindner KT, Alnahdi GH, Wahl S, Schwab S. Perceived
Scientific and educational importance and implications for differentiation and personalization teaching approaches in
the learning sciences. J Learn Sci. 2006;15(1):11-34. inclusive classrooms: Perspectives of students and teachers.
Front Educ. 2019;4:58.
doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls1501_4
doi: 10.3389/feduc.2019.00058
31. DEWR. Workforce of the Future - Rethinking Skills for the
Jobs of Tomorrow; 2024. Available from: https://www.dewr. 43. Coleman J. Well‐being in schools: Empirical measure, or
gov.au/skills-organisations/workforce-future-event-series/ politician’s dream? Oxf Rev Educ. 2009;35(3):281-292.
workforce-future-rethinking-skills-jobs-tomorrow [Last doi: 10.1080/03054980902934548
accessed on 2024 Jun 27].
44. Konu A, Rimpelä M. Well-being in schools: A conceptual
32. Bearman M, Ryan J, Ajjawi R. Discourses of artificial model. Health Promot Int. 2002;17(1):79-87.
intelligence in higher education: A critical literature review.
High Educ. 2023;86(2):369-385. doi: 101093/heapro/17.1.79
doi: 10.1007/s10734-022-00937-2 45. Durlak JA, Weissberg RP, Dymnicki AB, Taylor RD,
Schellinger KB. The impact of enhancing students’ social
33. Chen L, Chen P, Lin Z. Artificial intelligence in education:
A review. IEEE Access. 2020;8:75264-75278. and emotional learning: A meta‐analysis of school‐based
universal interventions. Child Dev. 2011;82(1):405-432.
doi: 10.1109/access.2020.2988510
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
34. Yan L, Sha L, Zhao L, et al. Practical and ethical challenges
of large language models in education: A systematic scoping 46. Deppeler J, Aikens K. Responsible innovation in
review. Br J Educ Technol. 2024;55(1):90-112. school design-a systematic review. J Responsible Innov.
2020;7(3):573-597.
doi: 10.1111/bjet.13241
doi: 10.1080/23299460.2020.1809782
35. Kabudi T, Pappas I, Olsen DH. AI-enabled adaptive learning
systems: A systematic mapping of the literature. Comput 47. Morgan J. Critical pedagogy: The spaces that make the
Educ Artif Intell. 2021;2:100017. difference. Pedagogy Cult Soc. 2000;8(3):273-289.
doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100017 doi: 10.1080/14681360000200094
36. Moorhouse BL, Yeo MA, Wan Y. Generative AI tools 48. Page A, Anderson J, Charteris J. Including students with
and assessment: Guidelines of the world’s top-ranking disabilities in innovative learning environments: A model for
universities. Comput Educ Open. 2023;5:100151. inclusive practices. Int J Inclusive Educ. 2023;27(14):1696-1711.
doi: 10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100151 doi: 10.1080/13603116.2021.1984792
37. Cope B, Kalantzis M, Searsmith D. Artificial intelligence 49. Benade L. Flexible learning spaces: Inclusive by design? N Z
for education: Knowledge and its assessment in AI-enabled J Educ Stud. 2019;54(1):53-68.
learning ecologies. Educ Philos Theor. 2021;53(12):1229-1245. doi: 10.1007/s40841-019-00129-6
doi: 10.1080/00131857.2020.1728732 50. Shvarts A, Bakker A. The early history of the scaffolding
38. Yannier N, Hudson SE, Koedinger KR. Active learning is about metaphor: Bernstein, Luria, Vygotsky, and before. Mind Cult
more than hands-on: A mixed-reality AI system to support Act. 2019;26(1):4-23.

Volume 1 Issue 1 (2024) 9 doi: 10.36922/dp.4131