Page 16 - DP-1-1

Design+ Designing future schools

Ethics approval and consent to participate doi: 10.1080/20004508.2020.1857495

Not applicable. 12. Imms W, Cleveland B, Fisher K. Evaluating Learning
Environments: Snapshots of Emerging Issues, Methods and
Consent for publication Knowledge. Berlin: Springer; 2016.

Not applicable. 13. Fisher K, Dovey K. Plans and pedagogies: School design
as socio-spatial assemblage. In: Fisher K, editor. The
Availability of data Translational Design of Schools. Netherlands: Brill; 2016.
p. 157-177.
Not applicable.
14. Charteris J, Smardon D, Nelson E. Innovative learning
References environments and new materialism: A conjunctural analysis
of pedagogic spaces. Des Educ Pedagogy. 2017;49(8):28-41.
1. Boyd R. The Boyer Lectures - Artificial Australia.
United Kingdom: Australian Broadcasting Commission, doi: 10.1080/00131857.2017.1298035
Ambassador Press; 1967. 15. Imms W. Innovative learning spaces: Catalysts/agents
2. Woodfield R, editor. The Essential Gombrich: Selected Writings for change, or “just another fad”? In: Alterator S, Deed C,
on Art and Culture. United States: Phaidon Press; 1996. editors. School Space and its Occupation. Netherlands: Brill;
2018. p. 107-118.
3. Snyder H. Literature review as a research methodology: An
overview and guidelines. J Bus Res. 2019;104:333-339. 16. Wilson BG, Myers KM. Situated cognition in theoretical
and practical context. In: Jonassen DH, Land SM, editors.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039 Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments. United
4. Beichner RJ. History and evolution of active learning spaces. States: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2000.
New Dir Teach Learn. 2014;2014(137):9-16. p. 57-88.
doi: 10.1002/tl.20081 doi: 10.4324/9781410602901
5. Lippman PC, Matthews E. Re-imagining the open 17. Gomez K, Lee US. Situated cognition and learning
classroom. In: Alterator S, Deed C, editors. School Space and environments: Implications for teachers on-and offline
its Occupation. Netherlands: Brill; 2018. p. 63-85. in the new digital media age. Interact Learn Environ.
2015;23(5):634-652.
doi: 10.1163/9789004379664_006
doi: 10.1080/10494820.2013.817438
6. Whitescarver K, Cossentino J. Montessori and the
mainstream: A century of reform on the margins. Teach Coll 18. Greeno JG. The situativity of knowing, learning, and
Rec. 2008;110(12):2571-2600. research. Am Psychol. 1998;53(1):5.
doi: 10.1177/016146810811001204 doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.53.1.5
7. Cuban L. The open classroom: Were schools without walls 19. Vermeir K, Kelchtermans G, März V. Implementing artifacts:
just another fad? Education Next. 2004;4(2):68-71. An interactive frame analysis of innovative educational
practices. Teach Teach Educ. 2017;63:116-125.
8. Ogata AF. Debating and designing the postwar American
schoolhouse. In: Darian-Smith K, Willis J, editors. Designing doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.002
Schools: Space, Place and Pedagogy. London: Routledge; 20. Lewicka M. Place attachment: How far have we come in the
2016. p. 71-83.
last 40 years? J Environ Psychol. 2011;31(3):207-230.
doi: 10.4324/9781315714998
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.10.001
9. Brunetti FA, Cohen EG, Meyer JW, Molnar SR. Studies 21. Relph E. Place and Placelessness. London: Pion Limited;
of team teaching in the open-space school. Interchange. 1976.
1972;3:85-101.
22. Barsalou LW. Grounded cognition. Annu Rev Psychol.
doi: 10.1007/BF02186057
2008;59(1):617-645.
10. Murphy JT. “But aren’t we extinct?”: Inhabited reform and
instructional visibility in an open space school 40 years later. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
Teach Coll Rec. 2020;122(9):1-44. 23. Shapiro L. Embodied Cognition. London: Routledge; 2019.
doi: 10.1177/016146812012200901 doi: 10.4324/9781315180380
11. Rosén Rasmussen L. Building pedagogies. A historical study 24. Sfard A. Metaphors in education. In: Daniels H, Lauder H,
of teachers’ spatial work in new school architecture. Educ Porter J, editors. Educational Theories, Cultures and Learning.
Inq. 2021;12(3):225-248. London: Routledge; 2011. p. 39-49.

Volume 1 Issue 1 (2024) 8 doi: 10.36922/dp.4131