Page 18 - DP-1-1

Design+ Designing future schools

doi: 10.1080/10749039.2019.1574306 relationships and dispositions. Educ Citizenship Soc Justice.
2009;4(1):5-24.
51. Wood D, Bruner JS, Ross G. The role of tutoring in problem
solving. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1976;17(2):89-100. doi: 10.1177/1746197908099374
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x 63. Southall A, Deed C, Matthews EA, Cardellino P. Out of the
Box: Lessons from the COVID-19 school lockdowns for
52. Hod Y. Future learning spaces in schools: Concepts and future learning environments. In: Lippman PC, Matthews E,
designs from the learning sciences. J Form Des Learn. editors. Creating Dynamic Places for Learning: An Evidence
2017;1(2):99-109.
Based Design Approach. Berlin: Springer; 2023. p. 117-142.
doi: 10.1007/s41686-017-0012-9
doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-8749-6_7
53. Hertzberger H. Space and Learning: Lessons in Architecture 64. Goller M, Paloniemi S, editors. Agency at work, learning
3. Vol. 3. Rotterdam: Nai010 Publishers; 2008. and professional development: An introduction. In: Agency
54. Figlio D, Loeb S. School accountability. Handb Econ Educ. at Work: An Agentic Perspective on Professional Learning and
2011;3:383-421. Development. Berlin: Springer; 2017. p. 1-14.
55. Conley S, Enomoto EK. Routines in school organizations: doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-60943-0_1
Creating stability and change. J Educ Admin. 2005;43(1):9-21. 65. Eraut M. Informal learning in the workplace. Stud Contin
doi: 10.1108/09578230510577263 Educ. 2004;26(2):247-273.
56. Deed C. Teaching and space: Five propositions. In: doi: 10.1080/158037042000225245
Alterator S, Deed C, editors. School Space and its Occupation. 66. Ballard DH, Kit D, Rothkopf CA, Sullivan B. A hierarchical
Netherlands: Brill; 2018. p. 13-26. modular architecture for embodied cognition. Multisens
doi: 10.1163/9789004379664_003 Res. 2013;26(1-2):177-204.
57. Ribler G, Bossen A, Blasse N. School as space: Spatial doi: 10.1163/22134808-00002432
alterations, teaching, social motives, and practices. Stud 67. Cook VA, Hemming PJ. Education Spaces: Embodied
Paedogogica. 2014;19(4):145. Dimensions and Dynamics. United Kingdom: Taylor &
doi: 10.5817/sp2014-4-7 Francis; 2011.
58. Deed C, Cardellino P, Matthews E, Southall A. A qualitative 68. Malpas J. Putting space in place: Philosophical topography
exploration of cardboard architecture in post-pandemic and relational geography. Environ Plann D Soc Space.
schools. Int J Educ Res Open. 2022;3:100186. 2012;30(2):226-242.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2022.100186 doi: 10.1068/d20810
59. Deed C, Edwards D, Morse M, Townsend R. Translational 69. Woolner P, Thomas U, Tiplady L. Structural change from
participation: Student spatial perceptions. In: School Space physical foundations: The role of the environment in
and its Occupation. Netherlands: Brill; 2018. p. 171-185. enacting school change. J Educ Change. 2018;19:223-242.
60. Palincsar AS. Social constructivist perspectives on teaching doi: 10.1007/s10833-017-9317-4
and learning. Annu Rev Psychol. 1998;49(1):345-375. 70. Deed C, Lesko T. Unwalling’the classroom: Teacher reaction
61. Brannen J, Nilsen A. Individualisation, choice and structure: and adaptation. Learn Environ Res. 2015;18:217-231.
A discussion of current trends in sociological analysis. Sociol doi: 10.1007/s10984-015-9181-6
Rev. 2005;53(3):412-428.
71. Halpin D. Utopian spaces of “robust hope”: The architecture
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00559.x and nature of progressive learning environments. Asia‐Pac J
Teach Educ. 2007;35(3):243-255.
62. Biesta G, Lawy R, Kelly N. Understanding young people’s
citizenship learning in everyday life: The role of contexts, doi: 10.1080/13598660701447283

Volume 1 Issue 1 (2024) 10 doi: 10.36922/dp.4131