Page 129 - DP-2-2
P. 129

Design+                                                          Transposing human action research to design



               In: Fischer T, Herr CM, editors.  Design Cybernetics:   editor.  Handbook of Conversation Design for Instructional
               Navigating the New. Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 14.   Applications. Hershey, PA: IGI Global; 2008. p. 73.
               doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-18557-2-1                   doi: 10.4018/978-1-59904-597-9.ch005
            50.  Loader P. The epistemic/pragmatic dichotomy. Philos Explor.   66.  Valkenburg  RC.  The Reflective Practice in Product
               2012;15(2):219-232.                                Design Teams. PhD Dissertation, Delft University of
                                                                  Technology; 2000. Available from: https://resolver.tudelft.
               doi: 10.1080/13869795.2012.670723
                                                                  nl/uuid:8bbe62ab-e761-46f7-b386-3ead14a9d56d  [Last
            51.  Bissoonauth C, Fischer T, Herr CM. Extended linkography   accessed on 2025 May 26].
               to scrutinise the distinction between epistemic and
               pragmatic actions in design. In: Han JW, Lombardi D,   67.  Harman GH. The inference to the best explanation. Philos
               editors.  Advances in the Integration of Technology and the   Rev. 1965;74(1):88-95.
               Built Environment: Select Proceeding of Architecture Across      doi: 10.2307/2183532
               Boundaries 2024. Singapore: Springer; 2025.
                                                               68.  Thagard P. Conceptual Revolutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton
            52.  Ericsson KA, Simon HA. Verbal reports as data. Psychol Rev.   University Press; 1993.
               1980;87(3):215-251.
                                                               69.  Haig BD. Scientific method. In: Salkind NJ, editor.
               doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.215                    Encyclopedia of Research Design. Thousand Oaks, CA:
                                                                  SAGE; 2010. p. 1325-1329.
            53.  Kan JWT, Gero JS, editors. Quantitative Methods for Studying
               Design Protocols. Dordrecht: Springer; 2017.    70.  Schön DA.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals
                                                                  Think in Action. New York: Basic Books; 1983. p. 145.
            54.  Lee JH, Ostwald MJ, Gu N, editors.  Design Thinking:
               Creativity, Collaboration and Culture. Cham: Springer; 2020.  71.  Schön DA.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals
                                                                  Think in Action. New York: Basic Books; 1983. p. 146.
            55.  Smithwick D. Physical Design Cognition: An Analytical Study
               of Exploratory Model Making to Inform Creative Robotic   72.  Bavelas A. Communication patterns in task-oriented
               Interaction. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of   groups. J Acous Soc Am. 1950;22(6):725-730.
               Technology; 2016. Available from: https://dspace.mit.edu/     doi: 10.1121/1.1906679
               handle/1721.1/106727 [Last accessed on 2025 May 26].
                                                               73.  Bavelas A. A mathematical model for group structures. Hum
            56.  Glanville R. A  ship without a rudder. In: Glanville R, De   Organ. 1948;7(3):16-30.
               Zeeuw G, editors. Problems of Excavating Cybernetics and
               Systems. Southsea: BKS+; 1997. p. 131-142.         doi: 10.17730/humo.7.3.f4033344851gl053
            57.  François C.  International Encyclopedia of Systems and   74.  Leavitt HJ. Some effects of certain communication
               Cybernetics. 2  ed., Vol. 1. Munich: Saur KG; 2004. p. 312.  patterns on group performance.  J  Abnorm Soc Psychol.
                         nd
                                                                  1951;46(1):38-50.
               doi: 10.1515/9783110968019
                                                                  doi: 10.1037/h0057189
            58.  Goldschmidt G. Linkography: Assessing design productivity.
               In: Trappl R, editor.  Proceedings of the Tenth European   75.  Bavelas A. Communication patterns in problem-solving
               Meeting on Cybernetics and Systems Research. Singapore:   groups. In: Pias C, editor. Cybernetics Kybernetik: The Macy-
               World Scientific; 1990. p. 291-298.                Conferences 1946-1953 Transactions Protokolle.  Zurich:
                                                                  Diaphanes; 2003. p. 349-381.
            59.  Goldschmidt G. Linkography: Unfolding the Design Process.
               Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2014.                 76.  Von Foerster H. Principles of self-organization - in a socio-
                                                                  managerial context. In: Ulrich H, Kaken H, editors.  Self-
            60.  Schön DA.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals   Organization and Management of Social Systems: Insights,
               Think in Action. New York: Basic Books; 1983. p. 144-147.
                                                                  Promises, Doubts and Questions. Berlin: Springer; 1954.
            61.  Schön DA.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals   p. 2-24.
               Think in Action. New York: Basic Books; 1983. p. 153.
                                                                  doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-69762-3-1
            62.  Glanville R. A  (cybernetic) musing: Wicked problems.   77.  Guetzkow  H,  Simon  HA.  The  impact  of  certain
               Cybern Hum Knowing. 2011;19(1-2):163-173.
                                                                  communication nets upon organization and performance
            63.  Schön DA.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals   in task-oriented  groups.  Manage Sci. 1955;1(3-4):
               Think in Action. New York: Basic Books; 1983. p. 68.  233-250.
            64.  Schön DA.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals      doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1.3-4.233
               Think in Action. New York: Basic Books; 1983. p. 103.
                                                               78.  Kvan T. Collaborative design: What is it?  Autom Constr.
            65.  Glanville R. Conversation and design. In: Luppicini R,   2000;9(4):409-415.



            Volume 2 Issue 2 (2025)                         15                               doi: 10.36922/dp.4875
   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132