Page 127 - DP-2-2
P. 127

Design+                                                          Transposing human action research to design



            Methodology: All authors                              2011. p. 303-341.
            Visualization: Thomas Fischer, Chitraj Bissoonauth  10.  Zedeck S. Introduction. In: Zedeck S, editor. APA Handbook
            Writing – original draft: All authors                 of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Handbooks in
            Writing – review & editing: Thomas Fischer            Psychology. Vol. 1. Washington, DC: American Psychological
                                                                  Association; 2011. p. 1003-1004.
            Ethics approval and consent to participate
                                                               11.  Pinsonneault A, Kraemer KL. The impact of technological
            Not applicable.                                       support on groups: An assessment of the empirical research.
                                                                  Decis Support Syst. 1989;5(2):197-216.
            Consent for publication
                                                                  doi: 10.1016/0167-9236(89)90007-9
            Not applicable.
                                                               12.  Simon HA. The structure of ill structured problems. Artif
            Availability of data                                  Intell. 1973;4(3-4):181-201.
                                                                  doi: 10.1016/0004-3702(73)90011-8
            Data supporting the findings of this study are available
            from the corresponding author.                     13.  Ackoff RL. The future of operational research is past. J Oper
                                                                  Res Soc. 1979;30(2):93-104.
            References                                            doi: 10.2307/3009290
            1.   Eyster HN, Satterfield T, Chan KMA. Why people do what   14.  Schön DA.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals
               they  do:  An  interdisciplinary  synthesis  of  human  action   Think in Action. New York: Basic Books; 1983. p. 42-43.
               theories. Ann Rev Environ Resour. 2021;47:725-751.
                                                               15.  Rittel HWJ, Webber MM. Dilemmas in a general theory of
               doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-020422-125351         planning. Policy Sci. 1973;4(2):155-169.
            2.   Heckhausen H.  Historical trends  in  motivation  research.      doi: 10.1007/BF01405730
               In: Heckhausen J, Heckhausen H, editors. Motivation and
               Action. Cham: Springer; 2018. p. 15-65.         16.  Cross N. The development of design methodology in
                                                                  architecture, urban planning and industrial design. In:
               doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-65094-4-2                   Trappl R, editor. Proceedings of the Eighth European Meeting
            3.   Kirsh D. Adapting the environment instead of oneself. Adapt   on Cybernetics and Systems Research.  Dordrecht:  Reidel;
               Behav. 1996;4(3-4):415-452.                        1986. p. 173-180.
               doi: 10.1177/105971239600400307                 17.  Rittel HWJ. On the planning crisis: Systems analysis of
                                                                  the “first and second generations”.  Bedrifts Økonomen.
            4.   Locke EA, Latham GP, editors. New Developments in Goal   1972;8:390-396.
               Setting and Task Performance. New York: Routledge; 2013.
                                                               18.  Rittel HWJ. The Reasoning of Designers. Working Paper for
            5.   Thye  SR,  Lawler  EJ,  editors.  Advances in Group  Processes,   the International Congress on Planning and Design Theory
               13  ed. Bingley: Emerald; 2013.
                 th
                                                                  (ICPDT). Boston: 1987.
            6.   Brown R, Pehrson S. Group Processes: Dynamics Within and   19.  Rittel H. On the planning crisis: Systems analysis of the “first
               Between Groups. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2020.
                                                                  and second generations”. Bedrifts Økonomen. 1972;8:394.
            7.   Campbell JP, Wiernik BM. The modeling and assessment   20.  Frayling C.  Research in Art and Design [Royal College of
               of work performance. Ann Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav.   Art Research Papers]. Vol. 1. 1994. p. 1-5. Available from:
               2015;2(1):47-74.
                                                                  https://researchonline.rca.ac.uk/384
               doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111427
                                                               21.  Findeli A. Introduction. Des Issues. 1999;15(2):1-3.
            8.   Sonnentag  S,  Frese  M.  Performance  concepts  and   22.  Holyoak KJ, Thagard P. Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative
               performance theory. In: Sonnentag S, editor. Psychological   Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1995.
               Management of Individual Performance. Chichester: Wiley;
               2002. p. 4-25.                                  23.  Holyoak KJ, Thagard P. Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative
                                                                  Thought. Vol. 6. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1995.
               doi: 10.1002/0470013419.ch1
                                                               24.  Johnson-Laird PN. Analogy and the exercise of creativity.
            9.   Wildman JL, Bedwell WL, Salas E, Smith-Jentsch KA.   In: Visniadou S, Ortony A, editors. Similarity and Analogical
               Performance measurement at work: A multilevel perspective.
               In: Zedeck S, editor.  APA Handbook of Industrial and   Reasoning. New  York: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
               Organizational Psychology. Handbooks in Psychology. Vol. 1.   p. 313-331.
               Washington, DC: American Psychological Association;   doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511529863.015




            Volume 2 Issue 2 (2025)                         13                               doi: 10.36922/dp.4875
   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132