Page 128 - DP-2-2

Design+ Transposing human action research to design

25. Gentner D, Bowdle BF, Wolff P, Boronat C. Metaphor is like doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2004.05.004
analogy. In: Gentner D, Holyoak KJ, Kokinov BN, editors. 37. Gick ML, Holyoak KJ. Analogical problem solving. Cogn
The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2001. p. 199-253. Psychol. 1980;12(3):306-355.
doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90013-4
doi: 10.7551/mitpress/1251.003.0010
38. Dumas D, Dong Y, Doherty M. The influence of creative
26. Vosniadou S, Ortony A. Similarity and analogical reasoning: expertise on the sensitivity and selectivity of analogical
A synthesis. In: Vosniadou S, Ortony A, editors. Similarity reasoning. Mind Brain Educ. 2021;15(3):239-249.
and Analogical Reasoning. New York; Cambridge University
Press; 1989. p. 1-18. doi: 10.1111/mbe.12287
doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511529863.002 39. Gilbert SW. An evaluation of the use of analogy, simile
and metaphor in science texts. J Res Sci Teach. 1989;26(4):
27. Hofstadter DR. Epilogue: Analogy as the core of cognition.
In: Gentner D, Holyoak KJ, Kokinov BN, editors. The 315-327.
Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660260405
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2001. p. 499-538.
40. Morice-Singh C. Indian calculation: The rule of three-quite
doi: 10.7551/mitpress/1251.003.0020 a story In: Barbin É, Guichard JP, Moyon M, editors. Let
28. Vosniadou S, Ortony A. Similarity and analogical reasoning: History into the Mathematics Classroom. Cham: Springer;
A synthesis. In: Vosniadou S, Ortony A, editors. Similarity 2018. p. 47-57.
and Analogical Reasoning. New York: Cambridge University doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-57150-8-4
Press; 1989. p. 1.
41. Pang KYP, Pierre Pang’s Com£puter. YouTube Video, 3:48,
doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511529863.002 Final Project, BA(Hons) in Industrial and Product Design,
29. Holyoak KJ, Thagard P. Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative School of Design, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University,
Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1995. p. 2-5. Posted by Yinjohn; 2007. Available from: https://youtu.be/
ED82V-mx3R0 [Last accessed on 2025 May 26].
30. Crilly N. The evolution of “co-evolution” (Part II): The
biological analogy, different kinds of co-evolution, and 42. Kirsh D, Maglio P. On distinguishing epistemic from
proposals for conceptual expansion. She Ji J Des Econ Innov. pragmatic action. Cogn Sci. 1994;18(4):513-549.
2021;7(3):333-355. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1804-1
doi: 10.1016/j.sheji.2021.07.004 43. Cross N. The development of design methodology in
31. Johnson-Laird PN. Analogy and the exercise of creativity. architecture, urban planning and industrial design. In:
In: Visniadou S, Ortony A, editors. Similarity and Analogical Trappl R, editor. Proceedings of the Eighth European Meeting
Reasoning. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1989. on Cybernetics and Systems Research. Dordrecht: Reidel;
p. 313. 1986. p. 179.
doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511529863.015 44. Cross N. Engineering Design Methods: Strategies for Product
Design. 3 ed. Chichester: Wiley; 2008. p. 36.
rd
32. Gentner D. Analogy. In: Wilson RA, Keil FC, editors. The
MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences. Cambridge, MA: 45. Schön DA. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals
MIT Press; 1999. p. 17-20. Think in Action. New York: Basic Books; 1983.
33. Ponsi A. Analogy and Design. Charlottesville, VA: University 46. Suchman LA. Plans and Situated Actions: An Inquiry
of Virginia Press; 2015. into the Idea of Human-Machine Communication.
PhD Dissertation, University of California; 1984.
34. Hey J, Linsey J, Agogino AM, Wood KL. Analogies Available from: https://www.proquest.com/openview/
and metaphors in creative design. Int J Eng Educ. 5bcb63f1571b270f8fae350e7ad622d5/1 [Last accessed on
2008;24(2):283-294.
2025 May 26].
doi: vol24-2/s11-ijee2031
47. Glanville R. Acting to understand and understanding to act.
35. Casakin H, Goldschmidt G. Expertise and the use of visual Kybernetes. 2014;43(9-10):1293-1300.
analogy: Implications for design education. Des Stud.
1999;20(2):153-175. doi: 10.1108/K-07-2014-0147
48. Glanville R. Researching design and designing research. Des
doi: 10.1016/S0142-694X(98)00032-5
Issues. 1999;15(2):80-91.
36. Ball LJ, Ormerod TC, Morley NJ. Spontaneous analogizing
in engineering design: A comparative analysis of experts and doi: 10.2307/1511844
novices. Des Stud. 2004;25(5):495-508. 49. Fischer T, Herr CM. An introduction to design cybernetics.

Volume 2 Issue 2 (2025) 14 doi: 10.36922/dp.4875