Page 50 - DP-2-2
P. 50

Design+                                                          EV charging capacity through queuing model



               doi: 10.1109/TASE.2023.3321412                     doi: 10.1007/s11518-017-5352-6
            5.   Wu J, Su H, Meng J, Lin M. Electric vehicle charging   16.  Loni A, Asadi S. Data-driven equitable placement for electric
               scheduling considering infrastructure constraints.  Energy.   vehicle charging stations: Case study San Francisco. Energy.
               2023;278:127806.                                   2023;282:128796.
               doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127806                  doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.128796
            6.   Bayram IS, Tajer A, Abdallah M, Qaraqe K. Capacity   17.  Mei Z, Que Z, Qiu H, Zhu Z, Cai Z. Optimizing the
               planning frameworks for electric vehicle charging stations   configuration  of  electric  vehicle  charging  piles  in  public
               with multiclass customers.  IEEE Trans Smart Grid.   parking lots based on a multi-agent model. Phys A Stat Mech
               2015;6(4):1934-1943.                               Appl. 2023;632:129329.
               doi: 10.1109/TSG.2015.2406532                      doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2023.129329

            7.   Ma SC, Fan Y. A deployment model of EV charging piles and   18.  Yang Q, Sun S, Deng S, Zhao Q, Zhou M. Optimal sizing
               its impact on EV promotion. Energy Policy. 2020;146:111777.  of PEV fast charging stations with Markovian demand
               doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111777                   characterization.  IEEE Trans Smart Grid. 2018;10(4):
                                                                  4457-4466.
            8.   Zhang X, Chan KW, Li H, Wang H, Qiu J, Wang G. Deep-
               learning-based probabilistic forecasting of electric vehicle      doi: 10.1109/TSG.2018.2860783
               charging load with a novel queuing model.  IEEE Trans   19.  Chen R, Qian X, Miao L, Ukkusuri SV. Optimal charging
               Cybern. 2020;51(6):3157-3170.                      facility location and capacity for electric vehicles considering
               doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2020.2975134                     route choice and charging time equilibrium. Comput Oper
                                                                  Res. 2020;113:104776.
            9.   Upchurch C, Kuby M, Lim S. A  model for location
               of capacitated alternative‐fuel stations.  Geogr Anal.      doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2019.104776
               2009;41(1):85-106.                              20.  Wu T, Fainman E, Maïzi Y, Shu J, Li Y. Allocate electric
               doi: 10.1111/j.1538-4632.2009.00744.x              vehicles’ public charging stations with charging demand
                                                                  uncertainty. Transp Res D Transp Environ. 2024;130:104178.
            10.  Wang H, Zhao D, Meng Q, Ong GP, Lee DH. A four-step
               method for electric-vehicle charging facility deployment in      doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2024.104178
               a dense city: An empirical study in Singapore. Transp Res A   21.  Xiao D, An S, Cai H, Wang J, Cai H. An optimization
               Policy Pract. 2019;119:224-237.                    model for electric vehicle charging infrastructure planning
               doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2018.11.012                     considering queuing behavior with finite queue length.
                                                                  J Energy Storage. 2020;29:101317.
            11.  Bai X, Chin KS, Zhou Z. A bi-objective model for location
               planning of electric vehicle charging stations with GPS      doi: 10.1016/j.est.2020.101317
               trajectory data. Comput Indus Eng. 2019;128:591-604.  22.  Zhang Y, Wang Y, Li F, Wu B, Chiang YY, Zhang X. Efficient
               doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2019.01.008                     deployment of electric vehicle charging infrastructure:
                                                                  Simultaneous  optimization  of  charging  station  placement
            12.  Brandt T, Wagner S, Neumann D. Prescriptive analytics in   and charging pile assignment. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst.
               public-sector  decision-making:  A  framework  and  insights   2020;22(10):6654-6659.
               from charging infrastructure planning.  Eur J Oper Res.
               2021;291(1):379-393.                               doi: 10.1109/TITS.2020.2990694
               doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.09.034                 23.  Mishra S, Mondal A, Mondal S. Charging station siting
                                                                  and sizing considering uncertainty in electric vehicle
            13.  Çelik S, Ok Ş. Electric vehicle charging stations: Model,   charging demand distribution. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst.
               algorithm, simulation, location, and capacity planning.   2024;25:12709-12721.
               Heliyon. 2024;10(7):e29153.
                                                                  doi: 10.1109/TITS.2024.3384537
               doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29153
                                                               24.  Zhang J, Wang Z, Miller EJ, et al. Multi-period planning of
            14.  Cao W, Wan Y, Wang L, Wu Y. Location and capacity   locations and capacities of public charging stations. J Energy
               determination of charging station based on electric vehicle   Storage. 2023;72:108565.
               charging behavior analysis. IEEJ Trans Electr Electron Eng.
               2021;16(6):827-834.                                doi: 10.1016/j.est.2023.108565
               doi: 10.1002/tee.23378                          25.  Eick SG, Massey WA, Whitt W. The physics of the Mt/G/∞
                                                                  queue. Oper Res. 1993;41(4):731-742.
            15.  Zhu Z, Gao Z, Zheng J, Du H. Charging station planning for
               plug-in electric vehicles. J Syst Sci Syst Eng. 2018;27:24-45.     doi: 10.1287/opre.41.4.731


            Volume 2 Issue 2 (2025)                         13                               doi: 10.36922/dp.4225
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55