Page 82 - DP-2-2

Design+ Meaningful digital consent: A VSD study

doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-82786-1 doi: 10.46630/dpp.2023
16. Van Velsen L, Ludden G, Grünloh C. The limitations of user- 28. Aslan S, Aybek B. The value of helpfulness: An analysis of the
and human-centered design in an eHealth context and how to 4 grade primary school students’ views and their drawings.
th
move beyond them. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(10):e37341. Int Online J Educ Sci. 2019;11(5):106-118.
doi: 10.2196/37341 doi: 10.15345/iojes.2019.05.007
17. Friedman B, Hendry D. Value Sensitive Design: Shaping 29. Westin AF. Privacy and Freedom. New York: Athenum; 1967.
Technology with Moral Imagination. United States: MIT
Press; 2019. 30. Shin HD, Zaheer J, Torous J, Strudwick G. Designing
implementation strategies for a digital suicide safety
18. Goldstein MM. Health information technology and the idea planning intervention in a psychiatric emergency
of informed consent. J Law Med Ethics. 2010;38(1):27-35. department: Protocol for a multimethod research project.
doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2010.00463.x JMIR Res Protoc. 2023;12(1):e50643.
19. Latour B. On actor-network theory: A few clarifications. doi: 10.2196/50643
Soziale Welt. 1996;47(4):369-381. 31. Shen N, Strauss J, Silver M, Carter-Langford A, Wiljer D. The
20. Friedman B, Felten E, Millett LI. Informed consent online: eHealth trust model: A patient privacy research framework.
A conceptual model and design principles. In: University Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019;257:382-387.
of Washington Computer Science and Engineering Technical doi: 10.3233/978-1-61499-951-5-382
Report 00-12-2; 2000. p. 8.
32. Shen N, Kassam I, Zhao H, et al. Foundations for meaningful
21. Friedman B, Kahn PH, Borning A. Value Sensitive Design consent in Canada’s digital health ecosystem: Retrospective
and Information Systems. In: Himma KE, Tavani HT, study. JMIR Med Inform. 2022;10(3):e30986.
editors. The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics.
st
1 ed. United States: Wiley; 2008. p. 69-101. doi: 10.2196/30986
doi: 10.1002/9780470281819.ch4 33. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N,
Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-a
22. The National Commission for the Protection of Human metadata-driven methodology and workflow process
Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The for providing translational research informatics support.
Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the J Biomed Informat. 2009;42(2):377-381.
Protection of Human Subjects of Research. US Department
of Health, Education, and Welfare; 1979. Avaialble from : doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/sites/default/files/the-belmont- 34. Kowalski CP, Nevedal AL, Finley EP, et al. Planning for
report-508c_final.pdf [Last accessed on 2024 Nov 29]. and assessing rigor in rapid qualitative analysis (PARRQA):
23. Faden RR, Beauchamp TL. A History and Theory of Informed A consensus-based framework for designing, conducting,
Consent. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1986. and reporting. Implement Sci. 2024;19(1):71.
24. Friedman B, Howe DC, Felten E. Informed consent in the doi: 10.1186/s13012-024-01397-1
Mozilla browser: implementing value-sensitive design. In: 35. Hamilton AB, Finley EP. Qualitative methods in
th
Proceedings of the 35 Annual Hawaii International Conference implementation research: An introduction. Psychiatry Res.
on System Sciences. IEEE Computer Society; 2002. p. 10. 2019;280:112516.
doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2002.994366 doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112516
25. Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada. Consultation 36. Canada Health Infoway. What Canadians Think
on consent under PIPEDA; 2017. Available from: https://www. 2022 - Privacy Edition Survey: Canadians’ Perspectives on
priv.gc.ca/en/about-the-opc/what-we-do/consultations/ Digital Health Privacy. Canada Health Infoway; 2022. https://
completed-consultations/consultation-on-consent-under- www.infoway-inforoute.ca/en/component/edocman/
pipeda [Last accessed on 2024 Dec 02].
resources/reports/privacy/6403-what-canadians-think-
26. Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada. Consent 2022-privacy-edition-survey-canadians-perspectives-on-
and Privacy - A Discussion Paper Exploring Potential digital-health-privacy [Last accessed on 2023 Feb 08].
Enhancements to consent under the Personal Information 37. Bernaerdt J, Moerenhout T, Devisch I. Vulnerable patients’
Protection and Electronic Documents Act; 2016. Available attitudes towards sharing medical data and granular control
from: https://www.priv.gc.ca/en/opc-actions-and-decisions/ in patient portal systems: An interview study. J Eval Clin
research/explore-privacy-research/2016/consent_201605 Pract. 2021;27(2):429-37.
[Last accessed on 2023 Oct 03].
doi: 10.1111/jep.13465
27. Autora G. Current Challenges in Psychological Science.
Serbia: Filozofski fakultet u Nišu; 2023. 38. Van der Schyff K, Foster G, Renaud K, Flowerday S. Online

Volume 2 Issue 2 (2025) 11 doi: 10.36922/dp.8158