Page 83 - DP-2-2

Design+ Meaningful digital consent: A VSD study

privacy fatigue: A scoping review and research agenda. racialization decenter attempts at person-centered mental
Future Internet. 2023;15(5):164. health care. Clin Psychol Sci. 2023;11(3):476-489.
doi: 10.3390/fi15050164 doi: 10.1177/21677026221133053
39. Anhalt-Depies C, Stenglein JL, Zuckerberg B, Townsend PA, 43. Zaman B, Jafari Naimi N. A Value Sensitive Design Case Study: Why
Rissman AR. Tradeoffs and tools for data quality, privacy, Values do (not) Design. In: Workshop Charting the Next Decade for
transparency, and trust in citizen science. Biol Conserv. Value Sensitive Design, Critical Alternatives Conference 2015.
2019;238:108195. 44. Borning A, Muller M. Next Steps for Value Sensitive Design.
In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors
doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108195
in Computing Systems. ACM; 2012. p. 1125-1134.
40. Wong RY, Mulligan DK, Van Wyk E, Pierce J, Chuang J. doi: 10.1145/2207676.2208560
Eliciting values reflections by engaging privacy futures
using design workbooks. Proc ACM Hum Comput Interact. 45. Dietkus R. The call for trauma‐informed design research
2017;1:1-26. and practice. Des Manag Rev. 2022;33(2):26-31.
doi: 10.1145/3134746 doi: 10.1111/drev.12295
41. Gerteis M, Edgman-Levitan S, Daley J, Delbanco TL. 46. Carey H. Anti-oppression mindsets for collaborative design.
Through the Patient’s Eyes: Understanding and Promoting In: Synergy - DRS International Conference 2020; 2020.
Patient-Centered Care. United States: John Wiley and doi: 10.21606/drs.2020.277
Sons; 2002.
47. World Economic Forum. Reimagining Notice and Consent
42. Desai MU, Paranamana N, Dovidio JF, Davidson L, for Human- Technology Interaction. Switzerland: World
Stanhope V. System-Centered Care: How bureaucracy and Economic Forum; 2020.

Volume 2 Issue 2 (2025) 12 doi: 10.36922/dp.8158