Page 231 - EJMO-9-3

Eurasian Journal of
Medicine and Oncology FN3K–Nrf2 axis inhibition in breast cancer

15. Cheng T, Li Q, Zhou Z, Wang Y, Bryant SH. Structure-based 27. University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA).
virtual screening for drug discovery: A problem-centric SAVES - Structure Analysis and Verification Server.
review. AAPS J. 2012;14(1):133-141. Available from: https://saves.mbi.ucla.edu [Last accessed on
doi: 10.1208/s12248-012-9322-0 2025 Mar 15].
16. Hevener KE, Pesavento R, Ren J, Lee H, Ratia K, 28. Biasini M, Bienert S, Waterhouse A, et al. SWISS-MODEL:
Johnson ME. Hit-to-lead: Hit validation and assessment. Modelling protein tertiary and quaternary structure using
Methods Enzymol. 2018;610:265-309. evolutionary information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(Web
Server issue):W252-W258.
doi: 10.1016/bs.mie.2018.09.022
doi: 10.1093/nar/gku340
17. Wang XJ, Sun Z, Villeneuve NF, et al. Nrf2 enhances
resistance of cancer cells to chemotherapeutic drugs, the 29. Benkert P, Tosatto SC, Schomburg D. QMEAN:
dark side of Nrf2. Carcinogenesis. 2008;29(6):1235-1243. A comprehensive scoring function for model quality
assessment. Proteins. 2008;71(1):261-277.
doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgn095
doi: 10.1002/prot.21715
18. Schrödinger LLC. Maestro: Schrödinger Release 2024-1.
New York, NY: Schrödinger, LLC; 2024. Available from: 30. Benkert P, Biasini M, Schwede T. Toward the estimation of
https://www.schrodinger.com/maestro [Last accessed on the absolute quality of individual protein structure models.
2025 Feb 21]. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(3):343-350.
19. Friesner RA, Murphy RB, Repasky MP, et al. Extra precision doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq662
glide: Docking and scoring incorporating a model of 31. Schrödinger LLC. Protein Preparation Workflow.
hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes. J Med Schrödinger. Available from: https://www.schrodinger.
Chem. 2006;49(21):6177-6196. com/life-science/learn/white-papers/protein-preparation-
doi: 10.1021/jm051256o workflow [Last accessed on 2025 Mar 15].
20. Liu T, Lu D, Zhang H, et al. Applying high-performance 32. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI).
computing in drug discovery and molecular simulation. PubChem. Available from: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.
Natl Sci Rev. 2016;3(1):49-63. gov [Last accessed on 2025 Mar 15].
doi: 10.1093/nsr/nww003 33. Knox C, Wilson M, Klinger CM, et al. DrugBank 6.0: The
drugbank knowledgebase for 2024. Nucleic Acids Res.
21. UniProt Consortium. UniProt: A worldwide hub of protein
knowledge. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(D1):D506-D515. 2024;52(D1):D1265-D1275.
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad976
doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1049
34. Sahayarayan JJ, Rajan KS, Vidhyavathi R, et al. In-silico
22. UniProt. FN3K Fructosamine-3-Kinase Homo Sapiens
(Human). UniProtKB; 2025. Available from: https://www. protein-ligand docking studies against the estrogen protein
uniprot.org/uniprotkb/q9H479/entry [Last accessed on of breast cancer using pharmacophore based virtual
2025 Mar 15]. screening approaches. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2021;28(1):400-407.
23. Sievers F, Higgins DG. Clustal Omega for making accurate doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.10.023
alignments of many protein sequences. Protein Sci. 35. Ge Y, Pande V, Seierstad MJ, Damm-Ganamet KL. Exploring
2018;27(1):135-145. the application of sitemap and site finder for focused cryptic
doi: 10.1002/pro.3290 pocket identification. J Phys Chem B. 2024;128(26):6233-
6245.
24. Schwede T, Kopp J, Guex N, Peitsch MC. SWISS-MODEL:
An automated protein homology-modeling server. Nucleic doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c00664
Acids Res. 2003;31(13):3381-3385. 36. Elekofehinti OO, Iwaloye O, Josiah SS, Lawal AO,
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg520 Akinjiyan MO, Ariyo EO. Molecular docking studies,
molecular dynamics and ADME/tox reveal therapeutic
25. Ko J, Park H, Heo L, Seok C. GalaxyWEB server for protein potentials of STOCK1N-69160 against papain-like protease
structure prediction and refinement. Nucleic Acids Res. of SARS-CoV-2. Mol Divers. 2021;25:1761-1773.
2012;40(Web Server issue):W294-W297.
doi: 10.1007/s11030-020-10151-w
doi: 10.1093/nar/gks493
37. Park MS, Dessal AL, Smrcka AV, Stern HA. Evaluating
26. Kleywegt GJ, Jones TA. Phi/Psi-chology: Ramachandran docking methods for prediction of binding affinities of small
revisited. Structure. 1996;4(12):1395-1400.
molecules to the G protein betagamma subunits. J Chem Inf
doi: 10.1016/S0969-2126(96)00147-5 Model. 2010;49(2):437-443.

Volume 9 Issue 3 (2025) 223 doi: 10.36922/EJMO025150114