Page 84 - ESAM-1-1
P. 84

Engineering Science in
            Additive Manufacturing                                                       ML in additive manufacturing



            research  efforts and  existing research  questions.  The   Consent for publication
            perspective identifies the increasing complexity of applied
            ML models (e.g., large VLMs) which bring opportunities for   Not applicable.
            learning complex, multi-modal, and domain-specific tasks   Availability of data
            while  also introducing increased  data and computation
            requirements. Advanced approaches in ML-driven AM   Not applicable.
            are discussed. These include data integration, knowledge   References
            transfer, feature engineering, adaptive sampling, data
            augmentation, edge AI and federated learning, and   1.   Gibson I, Rosen DW, Stucker B, et al. Additive Manufacturing
            physics-informed learning. Emerging trends in applying   Technologies. Vol 17. Germany: Springer; 2021.
            ML models to AM concerns are identified (e.g., explainable   2.   Wang C, Tan X, Tor S, Lim C. Machine learning in additive
            learning). Opportunities to address data and modeling   manufacturing: State-of-the-art and perspectives.  Addit
            challenges are presented. Research and development of   Manuf. 2020;36:101538.
            large AM datasets, AM foundation models, and efficient      doi: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101538
            ML development approaches can support the applications
            of advanced AI models. Similarly, the industrial   3.   Naser  AZ,  Defersha  F,  Pei  E,  Zhao  YF,  Yang  S.  Toward
            deployability of these AI-driven AM systems demands cost   automated life cycle assessment for additive manufacturing:
                                                                  A systematic review of influential parameters and framework
            efficiency, reproducibility, reusability, data privacy, security,   design. Sustain Prod Consum. 2023;41:253-274.
            compliance  to  standards,  explainability,  and  human-AI
            teaming. The identified issues and research opportunities   4.   Sun C, Wang Y, McMurtrey MD, Jerred ND, Liou F, Li J.
            in this perspective can support the future integration of AI   Additive manufacturing for energy: A review. Appl Energy.
            in industrial AM processes.                           2021;282:116041.
                                                                  doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116041
            Acknowledgments
                                                               5.   Faegh M, Ghungrad S, Oliveira JP, Rao P, Haghighi A.
            None.                                                 A review on physics-informed machine learning for process-
                                                                  structure-property modeling in additive manufacturing.
            Funding                                               J Manuf Processes. 2025;133:524-555.
            This work is funded by McGill University Graduate      doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2024.11.066
            Excellence Fellowship Award (grant number 00157), Mitacs   6.   Hu  E, Seetoh IP, Lai  CQ.  Machine  learning  assisted
            Accelerate  program  (grant  number  IT13369),  McGill   investigation of  defect  influence  on the  mechanical
            Engineering  Doctoral  Award  (MEDA),  and  National   properties of additively manufactured architected materials.
            Research Council Canada (grant number NRC INT-015-1).  Int J Mech Sci. 2022;221:107190.

            Conflict of interest                                  doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107190
                                                               7.   Samadiani N, Barnard AS, Gunasegaram D, Fayyazifar N.
            Yaoyao Fiona Zhao is the Editorial Board Member of this   Best practices for machine learning strategies aimed at
            journal but was not in any way involved in the editorial   process parameter development in powder bed fusion
            and peer-review process conducted for this paper, directly   additive manufacturing. J Intell Manuf. 2024;1-41.
            or indirectly. Separately, other authors declared that they      doi: 10.1007/s10845-024-02490-4
            have no known competing financial interests or personal
            relationships that could have influenced the work reported   8.   Shevchik SA, Masinelli G, Kenel C, Leinenbach C,
            in this paper.                                        Wasmer  K. Deep learning for in situ and real-time quality
                                                                  monitoring in additive manufacturing using acoustic
            Author contributions                                  emission. IEEE Transact Ind Inform. 2019;15(9):5194-5203.
            Conceptualization: All authors                        doi: 10.1109/TII.2019.2910524
            Data curation: Mutahar Safdar                      9.   Garland AP, White BC, Jensen SC, Boyce BL. Pragmatic
            Visualization: Mutahar Safdar, Jiarui Xie             generative optimization of novel structural lattice metamaterials
            Writing – original draft: All authors                 with machine learning. Mater Design. 2021;203:109632.
            Writing – review & editing: Yaoyao Fiona Zhao         doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109632

            Ethics approval and consent to participate         10.  Wang Z, Yang W, Liu Q,  et al. Data-driven modeling of
                                                                  process, structure and property in additive manufacturing:
            Not applicable.                                       A  review and future directions.  J  Manuf Processes.


            Volume 1 Issue 1 (2025)                         17                         doi: 10.36922/ESAM025040004
   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89