Page 128 - GHES-2-3
P. 128

Global Health Economics and
            Sustainability
                                                                               Positive and negative aspects of caregiving



            Table 3. Happiness, gain, quality of life, psychological distress, and perceived burden in the four levels of hours of care per day
            Hours day caring  n     Happiness      Gain       Quality of life  Psychological distress  Perceived burden
                                     M (SD)       M (SD)        M (SD)            M (SD)            M (SD)
            <5                26    20.00 (5.28)  29.81 (6.83)  114.96 (2.82)   12.46 (5.27)       45.15 (12.33)
            5 – 10            34    20.27 (4.48)  28.88 (8.81)  105.77 (19.77   14.35 (5.19)       50,68 (10.04)
            11 – 15           18    20.61 (5.12)  33.22 (5.00)  104.67 (21.61)  14.89 (6.17)       53.89 (11.46)
            >15               62    18.40 (4.94)  31.18 (6.57)  101.16 (18.69)  15.98 (5.43)       53.97 (12.93)
            Notes: Significant differences: i. Happiness: ≤15 h happier than 15 h or more*. ii. Gain: ≤10 h lower perception of gain than 11 h or more*. iii. Quality
            of life: ≤10 h higher quality of life than 11 h or more*. iv. Psychological distress: ≤10 h lower psychological distress than 11 h or more*. v. Perceived
            burden: ≤10 h lower psychological distress than 11 h or more**. *p≤0.05; **p≤0.01.
            Abbreviation: SD: Standard deviation.

            day and those providing >15 h. A significant difference was
            found between these groups, with higher happiness scores
            for caregivers providing ≤15  h of care per day (n  = 78,
            M = 20.26, SD = 4.85) compared to those providing >15 h of
            care per day (n = 62, M = 18.40, SD = 4.94) (t [2,138]=2.23,
            p = 0.027). For gain, quality of life, psychological distress,
            and perceived burden, the four levels were grouped into
            two categories: ≤10 h and ≥11 h of care per day. Significant
            differences were found for the four variables between these
            two groups. The perception of gain or benefits increased
            significantly when the number of hours of care per day was
            ≥11 (≤ 10 h group: n = 60, M = 29.28, SD = 7.96; ≥11 h
            group:  n  = 80,  M  = 31.64,  SD  = 6.28;  t  [2,138] = 1.97,   Figure 1. Happiness, gain, psychological distress, and perceived burden
                                                               in the four intervals of hours caring a day. Image created using Microsoft
            p = 0.050). In the opposite direction, quality of life declined   Word
            when the number of hours of care per day was ≥11 (≤10 h
            group: n = 60, M = 109.75, SD = 21.45; ≥11 h group: n = 80,   the three levels of perceived burden, with two exceptions:
            M = 101.96, SD = 19.30; t [2,138] = 2.26, p = 0.013).  the comparisons between mild and moderate perceived
              Psychological distress and perceived burden followed   burden in happiness and gain. Happiness, gain, and
            a similar pattern, with higher scores for caregivers in the   quality of life scores decreased as the perception of burden
            ≥11 h group (Psychological distress: ≤10 h group: n = 60,   increased, while psychological distress increased as the
            M = 13.53, SD = 5.27; ≥11 h group: n = 80, M = 15.74,   perceived burden increased. These patterns are graphically
            SD = 5.78; t [2,138]=−2.37, p = 0.019. Perceived burden:   shown in Figure 2.
            ≤10 h group: n = 60, M = 48.28, SD = 11.33; ≥11 h group:   When the two levels of psychological distress were
            n = 80, M = 53.95, SD = 12.49; t[2,138] = −2.76, p = 0.006).  divided using the cut-point of ≥4, significant differences in

              Some of these results are shown in Figure 1, illustrating   happiness, gain, quality of life, and perceived burden were
            the variables happiness, gain, psychological distress, and   observed between the high and low psychological distress
            perceived burden. It can be seen that happiness decreases   groups, as shown in Table 5.
            for those providing >15  h of care per day, while gain,   The last comparison, between the percentages of
            psychological distress, and perceived burden increase for   caregivers with low and high psychological distress, using
            those providing ≥11 h.                             the cut-point of ≥4 across the three levels of perceived
              Table  4  shows  the  means,  standard  deviations,  and   burden, was significant (χ [2, n = 140] = 42.48, p < 0.001).
                                                                                    2
            significant differences between three levels of subjective   Figure 3 illustrates these percentages, revealing an almost
            burden, measured as perceived burden, in terms of   inverse symmetrical pattern: most caregivers with mild
            happiness, gain, quality of life, and psychological distress.   perceived burden were in the low psychological distress
            Comparisons were performed in the three higher levels of   category, while most caregivers with severe perceived
            perceived burden, as none of the caregivers in our sample   burden were in the high psychological distress category.
            fell into the  no-burden level. Using Bonferroni  post hoc   Similar percentages of low and high psychological distress
            comparisons, significant differences were found between   were observed in the moderate perceived burden level.


            Volume 2 Issue 3 (2024)                         6                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ghes.3145
   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133