Page 132 - GHES-2-3
P. 132

Global Health Economics and
            Sustainability
                                                                               Positive and negative aspects of caregiving


            techniques could provide more detailed information about   Availability of data
            the relevant variables in the caregiving process. Despite these
            limitations,  this  work presents  a  general  overview of both   The datasets generated and analyzed during the current
            negative and primarily positive emotions in caregivers and   study are available from the corresponding author on a
            how these emotions are interrelated.               reasonable request basis.

            5. Conclusion                                      References
                                                               Andreakou, M.I., Papadopoulos, A.A., Panagiotakos, D.B., &
            This study confirms that caregivers of PWAD experience   Niakas, D. (2016). Assessment of health-related quality of life
            negative aspects associated with caring for their relatives,   for caregivers of Alzheimer’s disease patients. International
            with burden and psychological distress playing an important   Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 2016:9213968.
            role. However, these negative experiences did not reduce the
            relevance of the positive aspects they also perceived, such as      https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9213968
            happiness, gain, and quality of life. Given the high cost of care   Andren, S., & Elmstahl, S. (2005). Family caregivers’ subjective
            for a PWAD relative and the fact that most care is provided   experiences of satisfaction in dementia care:  Aspects
            by family members, maintaining caregivers’ mental health   of burden, subjective health and sense of coherence.
            is a critical concern, as their well-being directly impacts the   Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 19(2):157-168.
            health of the care recipient. Therefore, the key finding of this      https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2005.00328.x
            study is that enhancing the positive aspects of caregiving,   Argyle, M. (2001).  The Psychology of Happiness. London, UK:
            such as happiness, gain, and quality of life, by moderating   Routledge.
            the time spent on caregiving with the help of day-care
            services or financial aid, would benefit both the caregiver’s   Brodaty, H., & Donkin, M. (2009). Family caregivers of people with
            and the care recipient’s health, ultimately resulting in long-  dementia. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 11(2):217-228.
            term savings for the public health services.          https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2009.11.2/hbrodaty
            Acknowledgments                                    Campbell, P., Wright, J., Oyebode, J., Job, D., Crome, P.,
                                                                  Bentham,  P., et al. (2008). Determinants of burden in those
            The authors thank all the participants in the study.  who care for someone with dementia. International Journal
                                                                  of Geriatric Psychiatry, 23:1078-1085.
            Funding                                               https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.2071
            None.                                              Carbonneau, H., Caron, C., & Desrosiers, J. (2010). Development
                                                                  of a conceptual framework of positive aspects of caregiving
            Conflict of interest                                  in dementia. Dementia, 9(3):327-353.

            The authors declare that they have no competing interests.     https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301210375316
            Author contributions                               Chappell, N.L., & Reid, R.C. (2002). Burden and well-being among
                                                                  caregivers: Examining the distinction.  The Gerontologist,
            Conceptualization: All authors                        42(6):772-780.
            Investigation: All authors                            https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/42.6.772
            Methodology: All authors
            Writing – original draft: All authors              Cohen, R., Leis, A.M., Kuhl, D., Charbonneau, C., Ritvo, P., &
            Writing – review & editing: All authors               Ashbury, F.D. (2006). QOLLTI-F: Measuring family career
                                                                  quality of life. Palliative Medicine, 20(8):755-767.
            Ethics approval and consent to participate            https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216306072764
            Informed consent was obtained in written form from all   De Camargos, M.G., Ribeiro Pavia, B.S., de Oliveira, M.A., de
            subjects involved in the study. Permission to perform this   Souza Ferreira, P., Nardoto de Almeida, V.T., de Andrade
            research was obtained from both the Family Alzheimer’s   Cadamuro, S., et al. (2020). An explorative analysis of the
            Disease Associations and the Ethical Committee        differences in levels of happiness between cancer patients,
            for Scientific Research of the University of Valencia   informal caregivers and the general population. BMC
            (H1367489852167).                                     Palliative Care, 19:106.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-00594-1
            Consent for publication
                                                               Del Pino-Casado, R., Priego-Cubero, E., López-Martínez, C., &
            All the subjects gave consent to publish their data in this   Orgeta, V. (2021). Subjective caregiver burden and anxiety in
            study.                                                informal caregivers: A systematic review and meta-analysis.


            Volume 2 Issue 3 (2024)                         10                       https://doi.org/10.36922/ghes.3145
   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137