Page 113 - GHES-2-4
P. 113

Global Health Economics and
            Sustainability
                                                                           Cost-effectiveness of oral semaglutide in Greece


            in  favor  of  empagliflozin  was EUR  122.78  and  606.85,   On the contrary, based on PIONEER 4, the cost per
            respectively. The cost difference in favor of empagliflozin   patient achieving control was lower with oral semaglutide
            increased significantly to EUR 1,645.80 and 1,311.67 when   14  mg compared to liraglutide 1.8  mg across all seven
            examining the targets of weight loss ≥5% and weight loss   treatment targets (Figure 7). Specifically, for the targets of
            ≥10%, respectively (Table 4).                      HbA1c ≤6.5% and HbA1c <7%, the cost difference in favor

              Based on PIONEER 3, the cost per patient achieving   of oral semaglutide 14 mg was EUR 2,022.47 and 872.64,
            treatment targets with oral semaglutide 14 mg was higher   respectively. The cost difference in favor of oral semaglutide
            than that of sitagliptin 100 mg across all assessed outcomes   14  mg remained significantly high at EUR 3,719.66 and
            (Figure  6). Specifically, for the targets of HbA1c ≤6.5%   13,807.92 when examining the targets of weight loss ≥5%
            and HbA1c <7%, the cost difference in favor of sitagliptin   and weight loss ≥10%, respectively (Table 6).
            was EUR 1,671.80 and 1,383.46, respectively. The  cost   3.4. Sensitivity analysis
            difference in favor of sitagliptin remained relatively high
            at EUR 1,303.82 and 616.42 when examining the targets   The PSA demonstrated that the base case results were
            of weight loss ≥5% and weight loss ≥10%, respectively   stable when sampling around the mean values of the
            (Table 5).                                         efficacy model inputs (Table  7).  The PSA  results were
















                           Figure 5. Cost per patient achieving treatment targets (PIONEER 2). Figure created using Microsoft Excel
















                           Figure 6. Cost per patient achieving treatment targets (PIONEER 3). Figure created using Microsoft Excel

            Table 4. Base case deterministic cost of control comparisons between oral semaglutide and empagliflozin
            Treatment targets                         Oral semaglutide   Empagliflozin    Difference (oral semaglutide
                                                       14 mg (EUR)       25 mg (EUR)       – empagliflozin) (EUR)
            HbA1c ≤6.5%                                  2,553.04          2,430.27             122.78
            HbA1c ≤7%                                    1,829.35          1,222.50             606.85
            ≥1%-point HbA1c reduction                    1,912.16          1,237.50             674.66
            HbA1c <7% without hypoglycemia and no weight gain  2,171.28    1,353.77             817.51
            Weight loss ≥5%                              2,994.07          1,348.27             1,645.80
            Weight loss ≥10%                             8,053.00          6,741.34             1,311.67
            ≥1%-point HbA1c reduction and weight loss ≥3%  2,833.26        1,997.15             836.11
            Abbreviation: HbA1c: Hemoglobin A1C.


            Volume 2 Issue 4 (2024)                         6                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ghes.3032
   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118