Page 14 - GHES-2-4
P. 14

Global Health Economics and
            Sustainability
                                                                           COVID-19 and the burden on healthcare workers


            a reduction in symptoms of depression and stress levels   and burden faced by each heterogeneous hospital, the
            when based on the principles of mindfulness, cognitive   quantitative  evaluation  of  implemented  measures  is
            behavioral therapy, and ACT (Kunzler  et al., 2020). In   required to assess improvements in mental health and
            addition, yoga-based interventions were demonstrated to   resilience. This could be achieved through the creation
            reduce emotional exhaustion, burnout, and anxiety while   and confidential distribution of anonymous pre-  and
            improving sleep and mental health (Spinelli et al., 2019).   post-intervention questionnaires  that address symptoms
            Moreover, mindfulness practices such as weekly 30-min   of psychological distress, such as the one presented in
            sessions, structured programs, and the use of apps such   Appendix 2, with global studies to assess their validity and
            as Smiling Mind have further demonstrated reductions in   reliability in each diverse and heterogeneous population.
            perceived stress, anxiety levels, and depressive symptoms
            (Spinelli et al., 2019; Smith et al., 2007; Flett, 2018; Braganza   4.2. Limitations
            et al., 2018; Barattucci, 2019). These strategies have been   This study was limited by heterogeneity in global study
            recommended by the ACEM and the UK Intensive Care   populations and variations in symptom evaluation tools.
            Society for improving staff well-being during and beyond   Furthermore, limiting the search strategy to emergency
            COVID-19 (ACEM, 2020; Braganza and Popham, 2020).  departments may reduce the findings’ generalizability to
              There is limited evidence supporting the efficacy of other   other frontline HCWs.
            strategies that have been initiated, such as engaging mental
            health professionals; peer-support groups; and provision   5. Conclusion
            of effective, open communication (Serrano-Ripoll  et al.,   The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has been
            2020). However, a supportive supervisor and work culture,   enormous, with its true toll unknown. Thus far, over 766
            along with practical support, were demonstrated to protect   million cases have been recorded worldwide, with almost
            staff mental health (Greenberg  et  al., 2020). Despite the   7 million deaths. While the spread is now more contained,
            lack of evidence, both the ACEM and ICS recommend   frontline HCWs are charged with continuing to ensure
            these strategies, when endorsed by strong leadership, as   that the health needs of this patient population are met,
            feasible and sustainable measures to support staff well-  recovering from the challenges posed by COVID-19,
            being (Braganza et al., 2018, Braganza and Popham, 2020).  and preparing for the next pandemic or major event. The
              The implementation of policies and practices to   psychological burden placed on future frontline HCWs
            improve the psychological health of frontline HCWs   during the early stages of a pandemic is a crisis that must
            was shown to be positively associated with increased job   be anticipated and addressed in advance. With over 50%
            satisfaction, improved workplace culture, and better patient   of frontline HCWs reporting symptoms of psychological
            outcomes (Braithwaite et al., 2017). Patient mortality rates,   distress, the impact of another pandemic will extend far
            readmission rates, adverse events, and patient satisfaction –   beyond the problem caused by the virus itself.
            all improve with a positive workplace culture (Braithwaite   Health institutions have implemented a multitude of
            et al., 2017). The adoption of health-promoting strategies   strategies to assist in minimizing the burden placed on
            is, therefore, a crucial tool in the arsenal of any health   frontline workers. These resilience strategies may be costly;
            service to support staff through their careers, where they   their use should be rigorously tested for efficacy as we move
            will face many significant challenges, including potential   into an unknown and uncertain future. The use of validated
            future pandemics or major events.                  strategies will provide a crucial tool for supporting the

            4.1. Future directions                             mental health of frontline staff, allowing them to continue
                                                               their much-needed work and ensuring the safety of their
            Future research should focus on ensuring that all health   entire communities now and in the future.
            services are aware of the high risks facing their frontline
            HCWs, as well as evidence-based interventions that can   Acknowledgments
            be implemented to support psychological well-being. This
            could be achieved through the distribution of informative   The author would like to acknowledge Oliver Hoffman,
            flyers, such as the example provided in Appendix 1, followed   who assisted in designing an informative flyer to be
            by research that assesses psychological symptoms pre- and   distributed to health services, and also the hard work and
            post-implementation and the creation of an evidence-  dedication of frontline HCWs throughout the COVID-19
            based toolkit for other health services to replicate. Further   pandemic.
            research should also investigate the long-term prevalence   Funding
            of psychological distress in individual hospitals and its
            associated burden. With the large variation in the exposure   None.


            Volume 2 Issue 4 (2024)                         6                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ghes.2530
   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19