Page 151 - GHES-2-4
P. 151

Global Health Economics and
            Sustainability
                                                                               Impact of dating violence on mental health


            (Lewis & Fremouw, 2001). Therefore, this term was used   2021; Cañete et al., 2022; Martin-Storey, 2015; Messinger,
            in the present study, which examines violence perpetrated   2011; Rollè et al., 2018; Stephenson et al., 2022), making
            by partners who are or have been in a dating relationship   it a significant public health concern (Kar et al., 2023). It
            but are not married or cohabiting. Dating violence has   has been argued that addressing IPV requires considering
            traditionally been understudied, despite evidence that it is   women and men as potential perpetrators and victims of
            a serious and potentially destructive issue requiring both   such violence (Costa et al., 2015), with evidence indicating
            empirical and clinical attention (Shorey et al., 2008).  that both genders can be victims and perpetrators (Costa

              The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC;   et al., 2015; Nicholls & Hamel, 2015). Although research
            2023) identifies dating violence as a type of intimate   on men as survivors of IPV is limited, surveys have
            partner violence (IPV). IPV refers to aggression or abuse   shown that men do experience IPV. Differences by sexual
            in romantic relationships with a current or former spouse   orientation have been noted, with bisexual men being
            or dating partner. IPV is a significant social and public   more likely to report sexual and physical violence, and
            health issue (CDC, 2023; Nicholls & Hamel, 2015; Ogbe   gay men more likely to report stalking (Dickerson-Amaya
            et al., 2020) and a global phenomenon (Krug et al., 2002;   & Coston, 2019). IPV among female same-sex partners
            Martínez-Heredia et al., 2021; Ogbe et al., 2020) that has   is  also  understudied.  Garay-Villarroel  et al.  (2023)  have
            many societal and individual costs (CDC, 2023). IPV has   noted the importance of examining this type of violence
            severe consequences for the mental and physical health of   separately, as it cannot be directly equated with violence
            victims and survivors (Bates, 2020; Breiding et al., 2015;   between heterosexual partners.
            Spencer  et al., 2019), as well as for families and society   This study’s purpose was to analyze both victimization
            (Nicholls & Hamel, 2015). In addition, IPV perpetration   and perpetration of violence among same-sex and
            has been linked to mental health problems (Spencer et al.,   opposite-sex partners who are not married or cohabiting,
            2019; Okuda et al., 2015; Yanez-Peñúñuri et al., 2023).  as well as among women and men. Further, it examines
              Although there is considerable variability in the severity,   the  association  between  victimization  and  perpetration
            function, form, and manifestation of dating violence (CDC,   of such violence. In addition, the study aims to determine
            2023; Shorey et al., 2008), it encompasses three facets of   the relationships between victimization and perpetration
            abuse: physical, psychological, and sexual (Callan et al., 2021;   with psychological symptomatology, self-esteem, and life
            Shorey et al., 2008; Spencer et al., 2019). Physical violence   satisfaction  among  women  and  men.  Finally,  the  study
            involves inflicting or attempting to inflict physical harm   analyzes how perpetration and victimization of violence are
            on  a partner  by punching, kicking, hitting,  or  otherwise   associated with age, level of education, internalization of
            using physical force; psychological aggression involves   traits commonly associated with masculine/instrumental
            using verbal and non-verbal communication to cause   and feminine/expressive traits, and traditional attitudes
            psychological or emotional harm and/or to exert control   toward gender roles.
            over a partner; and sexual violence consists of forcing or   2. Methods
            attempting to force a partner to engage in any type of sexual
            activity against their will (CDC, 2023). Although many   2.1. Participants and procedure
            studies of IPV have been conducted worldwide, most have   This cross-sectional study was conducted with individuals
            focused on married or cohabiting partners, heterosexual   from  the  general  Spanish  population.  The  sample  was
            partners, and women as victims. While IPV against women   non-probabilistic and included 288 women (54.5%) and
            is a serious public health issue (World Health Organization,   240  men (45.5%), aged  between 17 and  54  years. All
            2021) and a violation of women’s human rights with   participants were currently or previously in a partnership
            devastating long- and short-term effects on their physical   but were neither married nor cohabiting. If participants
            and mental health (CDC, 2023; Klencakova  et al., 2023;   did not have a partner at the time of the study, they were
            Sardinha  et al.,  2022), this  study  focuses  on IPV  among   asked to report on their most recent partner. Half of
            same-sex and opposite-sex dating partners.         the women (n = 144) and men (n = 120) had same-sex
              Although not as extensively studied as IPV among   partners, while the other half of the women (n = 144) and
            heterosexual partners, there is evidence that violence occurs   men (n = 120) had opposite-sex partners. We controlled
            between same-sex partners (Frieze et al., 2020; McGregor,   for age, education level, occupation, and marital status
            2023; Townsend & Bailey, 2021). Rates of IPV among   of the same-sex partners to match those of opposite-sex
            same-sex partners, while varying considerably across   partners (Table 1) and to ensure that these characteristics
            studies (Frieze et al., 2020), are comparable or even higher   did not differ between women and men (Table 2). Although
            than those among opposite-sex partners (Callan  et al.,   there was diversity in sociodemographic characteristics,


            Volume 2 Issue 4 (2024)                         2                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ghes.3300
   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156