Page 146 - GHES-3-1
P. 146

Global Health Economics and
            Sustainability
                                                                              Reducing public stigma related to psychosis


              The ANOVA results for forcing treatment, empathy,   values had fewer items and the current study’s sample
            social  restrictiveness,  and  prejudice/misconception   size was 133, the internal consistency reliability might be
            indicated no  significant  interaction between  time and   underestimated. Therefore, all subscales were included in
            group (p > 0.05). Therefore, the notable effects observed   the present study.
            from pretest to post-test for these factors were not
            maintained at follow-up, and no  post hoc analyses were   4. Discussion
            performed. Figure 2 shows the changes in subscale scores   The results of the present study demonstrate that a digital
            over time for both the intervention and control groups.  single-session  cognitive  behavioral  psychoeducation
              Internal consistencies for each AMI-SG subscale were   intervention effectively reduced several aspects of public
            calculated based on item scores in this study, with Cronbach’s   stigma related to psychosis in the short term. These
            alpha values of 0.74 for the 3-item social distancing subscale,   aspects include fear and perceived dangerousness, coercive
            0.75 for the 9-item tolerance and support subscale, 0.66 for   treatment, social distancing, social restrictiveness, and
            the 3-item social restrictiveness subscale, and 0.54 for the   prejudice and misconception about PMIH, compared
            5-item prejudice and misconception subscale. For the AQ,   with active control. The intervention also led to significant
            the fear/dangerousness subscale had 7 items (α = 0.93),   improvements in the help and interact and empathy
            the help and interact subscale had 6 items (α = 0.86), the   components of stigma. However, at the 1-month
            responsibility subscale had 3 items (α = 0.67), the forcing   follow-up, significant effects were only maintained for
            treatment subscale had 4 items (α = 0.62), the empathy   fear and perceived dangerousness and help and interact.
            subscale had 3 items (α = 0.73), and the negative emotions   There were no significant changes in negative emotions
            subscale had 3 items (α = 0.75). Cronbach’s alpha assesses   and tolerance and support from pre-intervention to post-
            internal consistency, with higher values indicating that   intervention compared with the control group. In addition,
            items  within  a  subscale  are  closely  related  and reliably   the responsibility subscale showed a significant increase
            measure a specific construct (Hajjar, 2018). In general, a   post-intervention relative to the control, contrary to our
            Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.7 or above suggests adequate   initial hypothesis.
            internal consistency (Hajjar, 2018). However, alpha values   Our findings of significant changes from pre-
            can be affected by the number of items, and a small number   intervention to post-intervention align with existing
            may lead to an underestimation of reliability (Hajjar, 2018;   literature on the effectiveness of cognitive behavioral
            Tavakol & Dennick, 2011). In addition, significant results   psychoeducation in reducing public stigma (Alonso et al.,
            often require a large sample size, typically over 200 (Hajjar,   2019; Kimmerle & Cress, 2013; Li et al., 2015). Consistent
            2018). Given that subscales with lower Cronbach’s alpha   with recommendations emphasizing the importance of































                              Figure 2. Changes in scores for each subscale over time for the intervention and control groups


            Volume 3 Issue 1 (2025)                        138                       https://doi.org/10.36922/ghes.3363
   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151