Page 148 - GHES-3-1
P. 148

Global Health Economics and
            Sustainability
                                                                              Reducing public stigma related to psychosis


            in collectivistic cultures. Previous research supports   The need to use existing research to enhance health
            the effectiveness of family-based psychoeducational   spending has been emphasized in recent literature (Idris
            interventions for complex mental health conditions in   et al., 2024). Leviton (2017) suggested that empirical
            such societies. For example, Ran et al. (2015) found that   studies on evidence-based public health interventions
            systemic psychoeducation involving families of individuals   should address common clinical challenges and provide
            with psychosis in China was beneficial and its effects were   practical knowledge for solving these issues. Research
            maintained over a 14-year follow-up. This outcome has   shows that public stigma associated with severe mental
            not yet been replicated in individualistic Western societies.   health conditions, such as psychosis, exacerbates social
            In addition, recent research by Mankiewicz et al. (2021)   isolation and economic inactivity among affected
            has demonstrated the cross-cultural acceptability of FIp,   individuals,  hindering their  ability  to  seek  professional
            including among Asian families.                    help and access health-care services, which in turn extends
                                                               the duration of untreated psychosis (Clement et al., 2015;
              An unexpected finding of the present study was that   Schomerus  et al., 2019). As noted earlier, the global
            personal responsibility for difficulties related to PMIH   socioeconomic impact of this situation is substantial,
            significantly increased after the intervention. According   involving both direct health-care costs and indirect costs
            to the responsibility model of attribution theory, if   related to prolonged unemployment (Chong et al., 2016).
            individuals are seen as responsible for their own difficulties   This is true for both Western and Asian societies (Zhai,
            and if these difficulties are perceived as controllable, they   2013), with mental health professionals in Asia identifying
            may be held personally responsible, which can influence   public stigma  as  a significant  barrier to accessing  and
            negative emotional responses and discriminatory behavior   engaging with health-care services for individuals with
            (Corrigan et al., 2003; Hinshaw & Stier, 2008). Therefore,   psychosis (Wen & Mankiewicz, 2024). Our study provides
            psychoeducation was anticipated to reduce attributions of   preliminary evidence supporting a structured, theory-
            personal responsibility, leading to decreased prejudicial   based, and evidence-informed intervention to address this
            attitudes and discrimination. Although this finding   widespread stigma. Such an approach can help individuals
            appears to contradict established literature, a recent study   seek help, access professional services, support their
            by Johnson-Kwochka et al. (2021b) found a strong positive   recovery, return to work, and contribute economically
            association between higher responsibility attribution and   to their community and society. The psychoeducational
            increased willingness to help or interact.         intervention, being brief and delivered digitally, is highly
              Johnson-Kwochka  et al. (2021b) suggested that   cost-effective and  can  be  easily  distributed  through
            attributing personal responsibility to PMIH may not   online platforms, social media, or mental health service
            imply blame but rather indicate a belief that individuals   websites.  It  is  ideally  suitable  as  part  of  larger  systemic
            have control over their recovery and can benefit from   campaigns addressing this issue. This aligns with the
            assistance. Our findings support this view, as they show   digital global health-care model currently promoted by
            a significant increase in participants’ willingness to help   G20 (Ramaprasad et  al.,  2023).
            and interact with individuals experiencing psychosis   This study had several limitations. Although the
            following psychoeducation. Considering the reduction in   psychoeducational  intervention  included  relevant
            stigma observed on most subscales post-intervention, our   information to counter general misconceptions about
            results challenge the assumption that higher responsibility   psychosis, it did not address specific societal myths and
            attribution necessarily leads to more stigmatizing attitudes   stigmas prevalent in Singapore, such as increased aggression
            and behaviors. Furthermore, rather than reinforcing   or self-harm tendencies, as highlighted by Mankiewicz
            the disease paradigm of schizophrenia, which portrays   & Kam (2024). Given that culture strongly influences
            individuals as disabled and unable to recover (Mankiewicz,   stereotypical views and prejudicial beliefs (Cheon & Chiao,
            2013), our psychoeducational intervention was based on   2012), there is a need for culturally tailored interventions.
            a cognitive behavioral model of psychosis, which views   Future research should compare the effectiveness of
            unhelpful delusional thoughts and safety behaviors as   psychoeducational content that addresses general
            controllable and subject to change (Mander & Kingdon,   misconceptions  with  content  customized  for  specific
            2015). Therefore, the observed increase in perceived   cultural contexts. In addition, we could not conclusively
            controllability may represent a positive shift in how   determine the effectiveness of psychoeducation as a
            individuals with psychosis are viewed, from being seen as   systemic intervention, as it was applied individually. As
            severely ill and needing separation from society to being   Mankiewicz and Tan (2024) have recently suggested,
            capable of managing their well-being and having the   exploring psychoeducation in community and health-care
            potential for recovery (Mankiewicz, 2015).         settings could provide insights into its effectiveness as a


            Volume 3 Issue 1 (2025)                        140                       https://doi.org/10.36922/ghes.3363
   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153