Page 143 - GHES-3-1
P. 143

Global Health Economics and
            Sustainability
                                                                              Reducing public stigma related to psychosis










































                                      Figure 1. CONSORT flowchart showing recruitment and study process

            Table 1. Descriptive statistics for the intervention and   Cronbach’s alpha values of 0.93, 0.82, 0.60, 0.79, 0.77, and
            control groups                                     0.81, respectively (Brown, 2008). The AQ demonstrates
                                                               adequate test-retest reliability and convergent validity with
                      Intervention   Control (n=66)  t/χ2  p
                        (n=67)                                 other stigma measures (Brown, 2008). It has been adapted
            Age     M=22  SD=4.56  M=22.14  SD=6.14  0.15  0.89  for  adolescents,  showing  validity  in  its  factor  structure
                                                               and internal consistency (Pinto et al., 2012), and has been
            Gender      64.18%        60.61%      0.18  0.67   used to assess public stigma toward various psychological
            (female)
                                                               disorders (Johnson-Kwochka et al. 2021a).
            of 0.707, 0.696, 0.709, and 0.665, respectively (Yuan et al.,   2.3. Procedure
            2016). The AMI-SG also demonstrates strong construct   Participants were recruited through convenience sampling
            validity for assessing attitudes toward PMIH (Yuan et al.,   and took part either in person (laboratory-based) or
            2017).                                             remotely (online). After reviewing an information sheet and
            2.2.2. Attribution questionnaire (AQ)              providing informed consent, they were randomly assigned
                                                               to either the intervention group (n = 67) or the active
            The AQ (Brown, 2008) is a  self-report tool designed to   control group (n = 66). Both groups completed the AMI-SG
            measure  public  stigma  regarding  PMIH,  focusing on   and AQ questionnaires at pre-intervention (Time 1), post-
            stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. It includes   intervention (Time 2), and 1-month follow-up (Time 3).
            26 items rated on a 9-point Likert scale from 1 (not at   Following pre-intervention measurement, the intervention
            all) to 9 (very much). The questionnaire comprises six   group viewed a digitally delivered psychoeducational
            subscales: (1)  Fear/dangerousness,  (2) help/interact,   session on psychosis, whereas the active control group
            (3) responsibility, (4) forcing treatment, (5) empathy, and   watched an educational video on obesity, which was
            (6) negative emotions. Internal consistency is high for five   unrelated to mental health. Both groups completed the
            subscales and moderate for the responsibility factor, with   post-intervention questionnaire and returned for the


            Volume 3 Issue 1 (2025)                        135                       https://doi.org/10.36922/ghes.3363
   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148