Page 124 - GHES-3-2
P. 124

Global Health Economics and
            Sustainability
                                                                            Community participation in primary health care


              Reliability was ensured through several measures,   These findings emphasize the need for capacity-
            including  internal  consistency  checks  during  pre-testing   building initiatives to equip WDC members with the
            and standardization of the data collection process through   necessary skills for effective resource management.
            training. The use of structured questionnaires and stratified   The functional factors evaluated included:
            random sampling further enhanced the consistency and   •   Social  mobilization: WDCs played a  pivotal role
            representativeness of the data. These steps collectively   in mobilizing communities for public health
            ensured that the tool reliably captured the involvement   interventions. For example, 96% of the committees
            and influence of WDCs on primary healthcare services in   coordinated social mobilization campaigns, such as
            Kebbi State.
                                                                  immunization drives and maternal health programs.
            2.6. Data analysis                                    These efforts illustrate their active engagement
                                                                  in  improving  health  outcomes  within  their
            Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics,   communities.
            and qualitative data were thematically analyzed to identify   •   Resource mobilization and drug availability: Through
            key themes and patterns.                              community-led  initiatives,  33%  of  the  WDCs

            2.7. Ethics approval and consent to participate       established their own DRF schemes in wards lacking
                                                                  functional government-supported DRF schemes.
            The Institutional Review Board of Euclid University   This initiative increased the availability of essential
            granted ethical approval to conduct the study, adhering to   drugs, particularly in underserved areas. However,
            the  Declaration  of  Helsinki.  In  addition,  all  participants   challenges such as the lack of formal financial systems
            gave their informed consent to participate in the study.  and limited training in financial oversight hindered

            3. Results and analysis                            •   the full potential of these efforts.
                                                                  Transparency and accountability: WDCs also
            A total of 191 out of 225 WDCs in Kebbi State and 200   influenced PHC-level transparency. For instance,
            PHC catchment populations were assessed.              61% of PHCs displayed operational hours, while 65%
                                                                  of them listed available services, reflecting improved
            3.1. Key structure and function factors               communication and client-focused practices. These
            This study evaluated WDCs based on structural and     advancements were driven by the supervisory
            functional dimensions critical to their effectiveness in   activities of WDCs and their emphasis on fostering
            supporting primary health care. The structural factors   accountability.
            assessed included:
            •   Establishment and routine engagement: All 191   3.2. Subgroup comparisons
               WDCs were successfully established, demonstrating   WDCs were divided into subgroups based on key structural
               100% adherence to the mandate of creating functional   indicators to explore the influence of structural factors
               community health governance structures. Almost all   on functionality. Comparative analysis was conducted as
               WDCs (97%) conducted regular monthly meetings,   follows:
               with the same percentage documenting these meetings   1.  Meeting frequency and functional performance
               in official minutes, signifying a structured and      Committees that conducted monthly meetings (97%)
               consistent  approach  to  community  engagement.  In   demonstrated higher  community engagement,  with
               addition, 87% shared these minutes with stakeholders,   85% successfully organizing social mobilization
               ensuring transparency and wider participation in   campaigns, compared to 63% for those meeting less
               decision-making processes.                         frequently. The Chi-squared test revealed a statistically
            •   Governance and oversight: A  significant 94% of   significant association between meeting frequency
               WDCs actively monitored the performance indicators   and community engagement (p < 0.05).
               of PHCs. This involvement indicates a strong focus on   2.  Financial management and resource mobilization
               governance and accountability, as committees ensured      WDCs with functional bank accounts (16%) showed
               that key metrics, such as operational hours and service   higher success rates in implementing DRF schemes
               costs, were tracked and addressed.                 (45%) compared to those without bank accounts
            •   Financial management: Although 91% of WDCs        (28%). This suggests a positive link between financial
               reported having independent means of generating    infrastructure and resource mobilization.
               funds, only 16% maintained functional bank accounts.   3.  Supervision and PHC accountability
               This gap highlights an area requiring improvement in   Committees  actively  monitoring  performance
               financial management and accountability mechanisms.   indicators (94%) were more likely to influence PHCs


            Volume 3 Issue 2 (2025)                        116                       https://doi.org/10.36922/ghes.4945
   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129