Page 42 - GHES-3-2
P. 42

Global Health Economics and
            Sustainability
                                                                                Random price generators in health policy


            financial information systems with implicit and explicit   The original econometric paper and the original case study
            information implemented in the correct settings and   on diabetes Type 2 are published in articles cited in this
            modes of enforcement (Sunstein, 2016).             paper; there are no other direct contributors in this health
              Integrating individual levels and microdata to represent   policy-oriented paper.
            the heterogeneity of demand (and patient needs) is usually   References
            achieved through  choice  modeling  (Abaluck  & Gruber,
            2013). Random price parameters in structural models   Abaluck, J., & Gruber, J. (2013). Evolving Choice Inconsistencies
            seem promising for structural models fitting complex,   in Choice of Prescription Drug Insurance, June, WP 19163.
                                                                  United States: NBER.
            competitive markets such as the US medical market. It may
            also be helpful when there is a disruptive transformation of   Berry, S. (1994). Estimating discrete-choice models of product
            market dynamics and more open boundaries in sciences.  differentiation. Rand Journal of Economics, 25(2):242-262.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.2307/2555829
            Acknowledgments
                                                               Berry, S., Levinsohn, J., & Pakes, A. (1995). Automobile prices in
            Emeritus Professor Christine C. Huttin is grateful to   market equilibrium. Econometrica, 63(4):841-890.
            Professor J. Hausman for his invitation at the economics      https://doi.org/10.2307/2171802
            department at MIT and his co-investigators Professor Hahn
            and Dr. Lustig for the computer codes and paper of the new   Berry, S.T., & Haile, P.A. (2014). Identification in differentiated
            specification test; these materials allow Professor Huttin and   product markets using market level data.  Econometrica,
                                                                  82(5):1749-1797.
            Professor Hausman to develop an application for physicians.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA9027
            Funding                                            Burda, M., Harding, M., & Hausman, J.A. (2012). Bayesian

            None.                                                 mixed logit-probit model for multinomial choice. Journal of
                                                                  Econometrics, 147:232-246.
            Conflict of interest                               Chen, Y., Pan, Y., & Ding, Y. (2023). How does market competition

            The author declares no competing interests.           affect supplier-induced demand? An experimental study.
                                                                  Frontier in Public Health, 11:1024337.
            Author contributions                                  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1024337
            This is a single-authored article.                 Colon, C., & Gortmaker, J. (2020). Best practices for differentiated
                                                                  products demand estimation with PyBLP. Rand Journal of
            Ethics approval and consent to participate            Economics, 51(4):1108-1161.
            Not applicable.                                    Colorni, A., & Tsoukias, A. (2018). In: Matsatsinis, N., &
                                                                  Grigoroudis, E. (eds.). General Framework for Designing
            Consent for publication                               Alternatives. Berlin: Springer, p.1-15.
            Not applicable.                                       https://doi.org:10.1007/978-3-319-90599-0-1
                                                               Ellis, A., De Bekker-Grob, E., Howard, K., Thomas, K., Lancsar, E.,
            Availability of data                                  Ryan, M., et al. (2019). Number of Halton Draws Required
            Not applicable.                                       for Valid Random Parameter Estimation with Discrete
                                                                  Choice Data. In: Proceedings, IAHPR Conference.
            Further disclosure                                 Evans,  R. (1974).  Supplier-Induced  Demand. Some Empirical
            Part of the results from figures and tables are extracted   Evidence and Implications. London: McMillan.
            from communications at conferences. EWG-MCDA meets   Glenk, K., Johnston, R., Meyerhoff, J., & Sagebiel, J. (2020).
            twice a year; it is a European working group and is in EURO   Valuation in environmental and resource economics.
            society. All the results were presented at Euro in Helsinki.   Methods, Trends and Challenges, 75:215-242.
            Usually, the EWG helps to prepare main conference.     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-018-00311-w
            Figure 2 is an extract from my own article in Technology   Grimmett, G.R., & Stirzaker, D.R. (2020), Probability and
                                                                                  th
            and HealthCare, only authors need to agree for tables.  Random Processes. 4  ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
            Table  1 is no problem since I mentioned that in the   Hahn, J., Hausman, J., & Lustig, J. (2020). Specification test on
            Archives of Health Sciences, it is an open access journal,   mixed logit models. Journal of Econometrics, 219:19-37.
            and the authors keep copyrights.                      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.03.015


            Volume 3 Issue 2 (2025)                         34                       https://doi.org/10.36922/ghes.3579
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47