Page 43 - GHES-3-2

Global Health Economics and
Sustainability
Random price generators in health policy

Hatchuel, A., Weil, B., & Le Masson, P. (2012). Towards an Sina Shih, Y.C., & Tai-Seale, M. (2012). Physicians ‘perceptions
ontology of design: Lessons from C-K design theory and of demand-induced supply in the information age: A latent
forcing. Research in Engineering Design, 24(2):147-163. class model. Health Economics, 21(3):252-269.
Hauber, A.B., González, J.M., Groothuis-Oudshoorn, C.G., https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.1710
Prior, T., Marshall, D.A., Cunningham, C., et al. (2016).
Statistical methods for the analysis of discrete choice Soekhai, V., De Bekker-Grob, E., Ellis, A., & Vass, C.M. (2019).
experiments. A report of the ISPOR conjoint analysis good Discrete choice experiments in health economics: Past,
research practices task force. Value in Health, 19:300-315. present and future. Pharmacoeconomics, 37(2):201-226.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.004 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-018-0734-2
Hausman, J., & McFadden, D. (1984). Specification tests for the Solow, B., & Pezalla, E. (2018). ISPOR’s initiative on US value
multinomial logit model. Econometrica, 52(5):1219-1240.
assessment frameworks: The use of cost effectiveness
Huttin, C.C. (2012). Mobile economics and pricing of healthcare research in decision making among US insurers. Value in
services. Technology and Health Care, 20:459-461. Health, 21:166-168.
https://doi.org/10.3233/THC-2012-0693 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2017.12.004
Huttin, C.C. (2015). Perspectives of biologists, epidemiologists
and geneticists’ controversies in science and health system Sunstein, C.R. (2016). The Ethics of Influence: Government in
reforms. Technology and Health Care, 23(1):103-108. the Age of Behavioral Science. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Huttin, C.C. (2017). Stated and revealed preference issues-
products, patients and physicians’ attributes in choice Sunstein, C.R. (2019). How Change Happens. United States: MIT
experiments. Technology and Health Care, 25(5):1005-1020. Press.
Huttin, C.C., & Hausman, J. (2021). Development of a physicians United Nation. (2003). Integrated Environmental and Economic
‘choice model using mixed logit with random prices for Accounting, internal Documents on Pricing Taxonomies.
drugs case study on diabetes TYPE II. Archives of Health UN: United States.
Sciences, 5(1):1-10.
Vass, C., Boeri, M., Karim, S., Marshall, D., Craig, B., Ho, K., et al.
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-124401/v1
(2022). Accounting for Preference heterogeneity in discrete-
Kurzweil, R. (2005). The Singularity is Near. When Humans choice experiments: A ispor special interest group report.
Transcend Biology. New York: Penguin Books. Value in Health, 25(5):685-694.
Mariel, P., & Meyerhoff, J. (2018). A more flexible model or simply https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2022.01.012
more effort? On the use of correlated Random Parameters in
applied choice studies. Ecological Economics, 154:419-429. Zhou, M., & Bridges, J.F. (2019). Explore preference heterogeneity
Park, S., & Gupta, S. (2012). Comparison of SML and GMM for treatment among people with Type 2 diabetes:
estimators for the Random coefficient logit model using A comparison of random-parameters and latent class
aggregate data. Empirical Economics, 43:1353-1372. estimation techniques. Journal of Choice Modelling, 30:38-49.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-011-0519-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocm.2018.11.002

Volume 3 Issue 2 (2025) 35 https://doi.org/10.36922/ghes.3579