Page 28 - GHES-3-3
P. 28

Global Health Economics and
            Sustainability
                                                                                Semaglutide for treating T2D and obesity


              The scientific reasoning behind the studies collected   $2.6 billion ($1 billion direct and $1.6 billion indirect)
            is grounded in the study design, which involved assessing   in 1969 to $98.2 billion ($44.1 billion direct and $54.1
            relevant published articles, comparing the effectiveness of   billion indirect) in 1997 (Mentis, 2023). The financial
            semaglutide for treating T2D patients with obesity, and   burden of T2D alone was recorded at $760 billion in 2019,
            evaluating the financial impact of the therapies on national   representing nearly 91% of total diabetes costs, with direct
            healthcare systems.                                costs being notably higher in high-income countries. For
              The  presentation  of  endpoint  data  focuses  on  the   example, Saudi Arabia, a country with a high prevalence
            comparative positive effects of semaglutide in patients   of T2D, spent nearly 25 billion riyals in 2014 on the
            with both T2D and obesity and the economic benefits   management of all forms of diabetes (Alkhatib et al., 2022).
            for  healthcare  system  sustainability.  Further  clinical   At the same time, several studies conducted on Denmark’s
            perspectives were also recorded to enhance the validity and   population have shown that the cost of treating T2D is
            robustness of the study’s outcomes, and specific measures   influenced by disposable income levels (Nauck & Dietrich,
            were proposed to improve access to innovative antidiabetic   2022).
            therapies.                                         4. Obesity
            3. T2D                                             4.1. Clinical elements of obesity

            3.1. Clinical elements of T2D                      Obesity is widely recognized as a significant global public
            T2D is the most prevalent form of diabetes (Hu  et  al.,   health issue, closely linked to numerous comorbidities,
            2023). A  variety of factors contribute to the increased   increased hospitalizations, and reduced life expectancy,
            risk of developing T2D, with obesity being one of the   and is regarded as a key aggravating factor in the onset
            most significant aggravating factors (Wilson et al., 2023).   of cardiovascular disease and metabolic dysfunction-
            Obesity is a significant risk factor for the development of   associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) (Xie  et al.,
            T2D (Wilson et al., 2023). Obesity is classified in severity   2022). The presence of T2D further increases the risk of
            using the body mass index (BMI) as Class I, II, and III   developing MASLD (Gu et al., 2023), as insulin resistance
            (Wilson et al., 2023). Overweight and obesity are defined   leads  to liver inflammation (Yuan  et al., 2023).  Obesity
            by BMI values of >25 and 30 kg/m , respectively, and are   also contributes to a range of complications, including
                                        2
            strongly associated with an increased risk of morbidity and   disability, psychological issues, cardiovascular disease, and
            mortality from T2D (Anam et al., 2022). These risks rise   kidney disease (Ma et al., 2023).
            further with higher BMI, and the presence of comorbidities   This trend underscores the immense strain on the
            such as hypertension and dyslipidemia (Anam  et al.,   sustainability of healthcare systems (Aldawsari et al., 2023)
            2022), which coexists with the T2D, are linked to insulin   and highlights the negative impact on the quality of life
            resistance.                                        for people with diabetes (Laursen  et al., 2023). It is also
              “Diabesity,” a widely known term amalgamating the   important to note that the medications used to treat obesity
            two conditions’ names, underscores the undeniable   and diabetes must carry a low risk of adverse effects (Guan
            connection between diabetes and obesity (Haddad et al.,   et al., 2022). In lighted of the evidence presented above, it
            2023), highlighting obesity as a critical driver of T2D   is clear that weight loss is an important goal for diabetes
            development (Ma  et al., 2023), with both conditions   prevention. However, the safety and tolerability of available
            contributing to  the  promotion  of  cardiovascular  disease   medications pose limitations on their use (Gao et al., 2022).
            (Kennedy et al., 2023).                              Since the majority of T2D patients are either obese
                                                               or overweight, with abdominal fat accumulation
            3.2. Health expenses for T2D management            contributing to increased insulin resistance, a weight loss
            The global healthcare costs for adults with diabetes are   of approximately 5 – 10% should be a primary objective to
            projected to reach approximately $1.03 trillion by 2030 and   improve clinical outcomes (Seidu et al., 2022). Achieving
            $1.05 trillion by 2045, with 90% of these costs attributable   this goal not only benefits individual health but also
            to the management of T2D and its complications (Laursen   reduces the financial burden on both patients and national
            et al., 2023). It is important to note that the total cost   healthcare systems.
            assessment also includes indirect costs, such as lost
            income and reduced productivity due to early retirement,   4.2. Costs of obesity
            morbidity, disability, and death. In the United States, the   On a global scale, the prevalence of obesity has been
            direct and indirect costs of diabetes healthcare rose from   increased at an alarming rate, tripling between 1975 and


            Volume 3 Issue 3 (2025)                         20                       https://doi.org/10.36922/ghes.8547
   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33