Page 43 - GPD-2-3
P. 43

Gene & Protein in Disease                                               Effect of phytochemicals in diabetes



            structures was downloaded and a total of 85 ligands were   interactions of two conventional H-bonds of length 2.45 Å
            examined for ADMET testout and drug-likeness features.   and 2.20 Å with Leu200; six attractive charge interactions
            The qualified ligands and control compound details   with Glu205 and Glu194 at lengths of 5.57 Å, 4.27 Å,
            are shown in  Table 6 and they were then used for lead   3.95 Å, 3.06 Å, 4.79 Å, and 2.96 Å; a salt bridge of 1.84 Å
            preparation and docking study.                     with Glu205 residue; Phe180 of target forms two π-cation
                                                               interactions of 4.16 Å and 4.91 Å; and an unfavorable donor-
            3.3. ADMET and drug-likeness calculation of ligands
                                                               donor interaction of 2.55 Å with Ala202 (Table S1).
            Some online tools were used for the drug-likeness    Figure  1B presents the binding of vindolinine (CID:
            predictions.  Out  of  85  ligands,  only  five  ligands,   24148538) through the selected pocket site (residue
            vindoline (CID: 425978), vindolinine (CID: 24148538),
            (+)-vindorosine  (CID:  261578),  Cr-1  (CID:  5315746),   Arg199) of AMPK1 chain A through non-covalent
            and Cr-2 (CID: 59908094) were qualified in the toxicity   interactions and had a binding affinity of −7.4 kcal/mol
            test (mutagenic, carcinogenic, irritation, and reproductive   (Table 8). In between the target and the lead, there are
            properties). The high, medium, and no-risk zones were   three conventional H-bond interactions with Arg182
            shown in red, yellow, and green colors, respectively. The   and Leu462 of 2.66 Å, 3.08 Å, and 2.20 Å; two  π-alkyl
            no-risk zone shows that the qualified biomolecules have   interactions with Leu462 and Tyr463 of 5.39 Å and 5.14
            low or non-toxic effects. The OSIRIS Property Explorer   Å, respectively; one π-π stacked interaction with Tyr441 of
            estimated values and DruLiTo software customized values   4.13 Å; and an unfavorable positive-positive interaction of
            details are presented in Table 7. The data indicated that the   3.97 Å with Arg182 (Table S1).
            biomolecules have drug-like properties.              Figure 1C shows the attachment of the lead vindoline
            3.4. Molecular docking investigation               (CID: 425978) with the active site of AMPK1 with non-
                                                               covalent interactions and having a binding affinity
            3.4.1. AMPK1 targets interaction with lead and control  of −6.3 kcal/mol. Their docking pose displays the presence
            Intermolecular interaction between metformin (control)   of strong intermolecular interactions where Leu462 and
            and AMPK1 target has been confirmed by their docked   Arg182 residues of the target form two conventional
            poses (Figure 1) and had a binding affinity of -4 kcal/mol   H-bond interactions of 2.31 Å and 2.30 Å, respectively;
            (see Table 8). Figure 1A shows the interaction between chain   Gly198 and Gln461 residues form three carbon H-bond
            A of AMPK1, pocket residue ARG199, and the control drug   interactions of 3.62 Å, 3.59 Å, and 3.56 Å; Leu200 residue
            metformin. The complex is formed between them with   forms an alkyl interaction of 5.20 Å; and Tyr463 of AMPK1


            Table 5. QMEAN scores for the model protein generated using the SWISS‑MODEL server
            Receptor   Template  Model quality estimation (QMEAN scores)  Sequence identity  Coverage  Method  Resolution
            AMPK 1     4rer. 1.A            0.68±0.05                 99.07        0.97     X-ray      4.05Å
            AMPK 2     7myj. 2.A            0.73±0.05                 99.82        1.00     X-ray      2.95Å
            Note: QMEAN scores referred to the degree of nativeness of protein, a score of>0.6 indicated good quality model protein.

            Table 6. Ligands selected for lead preparation

            Ligand      PubChem CID  IUPAC name                                                 Molecular weight
                                                                                                   (g/mol)
            Vindolinine  CID: 24148538  Methyl (1R,9R,10R,12R,19S,20R)-20-methyl-8,16-diazahexacyclo   336.4
                                     [10.6.1.19,12.01,9.02,7.016,19] icosa-2,4,6,13-tetraene-10-carboxylate
            Vindoline   CID: 425978  Methyl 11-acetyloxy-12-ethyl-10-hydroxy-5-methoxy-8-methyl-8,16 diazapentacyclo   456.5
                                     [10.6.1.01,9.02,7.016,19] nonadeca-2 (7),3,5,13-tetraene-10-carboxylate
            (+)-Vindorosine CID: 261578  1H-Indolizino (8,1-cd) carbazole-5-carboxylic acid, 3a-ethyl-3a, 4,5,5a,   426.5
                                     6,11,12,13a-octahydro-4,5-dihydroxy-6-methyl-, methyl ester, 4-acetate
            CR-1        CID: 5315746  Methyl 12-ethyl-10,11-dihydroxy-8-methyl-8,16-diazapentacyclo   384.5
                                     [10.6.1.01,9.02,7.016,19] nonadeca-2,4,6,13-tetraene-10-carboxylate
            CR-2        CID: 59908094  (4-Tert-butyl-12-ethyl-10-formyl-10-hydroxy-5-methoxy-8-methyl-8,   482.6
                                     16-diazapentacyclo [10.6.1.01,9.02,7.016,19] nonadeca-2,4,6,13-tetraen-11-yl) acetate
            Metformin   CID: 4091    3-(diaminomethylidene)-1,1-dimethylguanidine                  129.16


            Volume 2 Issue 3 (2023)                         5                        https://doi.org/10.36922/gpd.0927
   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48