Page 47 - GPD-2-3
P. 47

Gene & Protein in Disease                                               Effect of phytochemicals in diabetes



            Glu279 of 3.45 Å; single unfavorable positive-positive   had passed the test, whereas the others such as vindoline
            contact with Lys260 of 3.81 Å. The binding energy between   (CID: 425978), (+)-vindorosine (CID: 261578), and Cr-2
            them is −5.3 kcal/mol (Table S2).                  (CID: 59908094) were unable to be detected, means they
              Comparison between the potential energy of metformin   may cross the BBB [46,47] .
            along with the biomolecules of C. roseus on the target, we   In the journey of in silico docking analysis, we found that
            found that the tested compounds’ potential energy varies   metformin and the C. roseus alkaloids bind with chain A of
            from −6.2 to −5.3 kcal/mol and has a lower potential   AMPK1 pocket residue Arg199 and with chain A of AMPK2
            energy than the control (−4.2 kcal/mol) (Table 9). Hence,   pocket residue Glu264, other than substrate binding groves
            it is predicted that the tested C. roseus alkaloids can bind   of AMPK (Thr172). Hence, metformin and the biomolecules
            strongly with the target and are more potent activators of   act as modulators and indirect AMPK activators, which
            AMPK2 than metformin.                              activate AMPK by enhancing the AMP:  ATP ratio by
                                                               inhibiting complex I of the respiratory chain of mitochondria
            4. Discussion                                      and by intracellular accumulation of calcium [19,53,54] .
            Diabetes mellitus initially promotes hyperglycemia but in   The docking result of the present study indicates
            chronic  cases,  it  moves  toward  a  multi-factorial  disease   that vindolinine has a strong binding affinity with target
            situation. The current investigation supports that C. roseus   AMPK1 and AMPK2 with binding energy values of
            alkaloids are powerful stimulators of AMPK and have   −7.4  kcal/mol and −5.6 kcal/mol, respectively. Similarly,
            antihyperglycemic properties . The SOSUI prediction   the binding energy of vindoline with target AMPK1 and
                                    [51]
            result shows that human AMPK1 (UniProt ID Q13131) is   AMPK2 is −6.3 kcal/mol and −6.2 kcal/mol, respectively;
            a soluble protein and made up of 559 AA, instead of 548   (+)-vindorosine is  −6.3  kcal/mol  and −5.6  kcal/mol,
            AA as reported in a previous paper , whereas AMPK2   respectively; Cr-1 is −6.4 kcal/mol and −5.3 kcal/mol,
                                         [52]
            (UniProt ID P54646) is a membrane-bound protein and   respectively; and Cr-2 is −6.1 kcal/mol and −5.3 kcal/mol,
            made up of 552 AA (Table 1).                       respectively (Tables 8 and 9). The binding energy of the
              The ADMET test results (Table 7) have shown that   metformin is −4.0 kcal/mol with AMPK1 and −4.2 kcal/mol
            putative drug candidates of C. roseus phytochemicals obey   with AMPK2. Based on the outcome, it is concluded
            the Lipinski rule, that is, partition coefficient (cLogP) ≤   that the  C. roseus alkaloids vindoline (CID: 425978),
            5, which means the compounds have good hydrophilicity   vindolinine  (CID:  24148538), (+)-vindorosine (CID:
            and can engross quickly in the cells. The biomolecules   261578), Cr-1 (CID: 5315746), and Cr-2 (CID: 59908094)
            have a high opportunity of absorption in the oral and   stimulate AMPK1 and AMPK2 more effectively than
            alimentary canal after administration. The standard   metformin.  Numerous  researches  and  literature  found
            parameter for the logarithmic assessment of aqueous   that the C. roseus plant has a hypoglycemic effect and is
            solubility (LogS) is 0 to −4 at 25°C, pH = 7.5, and our   superior to biguanides (e.g., metformin). Furthermore, its
            result for the majority of ligands candidate is ≤ −4 mol/lit   extract  decreases  the  risk  of  diarrhea-related  toxicity  (a
                                                                                   [21]
            which means that the biomolecules have better absorption   side effect of metformin) .
            and distribution features. The molecular weight ≤ 500 for   As per the thermodynamic principle, “the lesser the
            the ligands represents their small sizes leading to a high   Gibbs free energy or potential energy, the higher the
            opportunity of  arriving  at  the  site  of  action  and a  high   complex stability”. The descending order of binding
            possibility of activity on the target site. The standard   affinity of AMPK1 with different ligands is vindolinine
            criteria for topological polar surface area (TPSA) are ≤140   (−7.4 kcal/mol) > Cr-1 (−6.4 kcal/mol) > vindoline (−6.3
            Å whereas the result shows TPSA ≤100 Å, indicating a   kcal/mol) = (+)-vindorosine (−6.3 kcal/mol) >  Cr-2
            molecule has a low polar surface and the ability to infuse   (−6.1 kcal/mol) > metformin (−4.0 kcal/mol). Whereas
            cells with high surface region for action, thus, they have   the descending order of binding affinity of AMPK2 with
            a high transport properties or membrane permeability.   different ligands is vindoline (-6.2 kcal/mol) > vindolinine
            Drug-likeness value varies from 0.58 to 3.95; the positive   (-5.6 kcal/mol) = (+)-vindorosine (-5.6 kcal/mol) > Cr-1
            and higher value indicates molecules contain the majority   (-5.3 kcal/mol) = Cr-2 (-5.3 kcal/mol) > metformin (-4.2
            of fragments having biological action or drug-likeness   kcal/mol). The  general binding  affinity of  biomolecules
            features.  The  drug-score result varies  from  0.49  to 0.84,   with AMPK1 appeared to be greater than with AMPK2,
            which means that ligands have the potential to meet the   which is likely due to the globular and soluble nature of
            criteria as a drug. The blood-brain barrier (BBB) crossing   AMPK1. Among all ligands, vindolinine (−7.4 kcal/mol)
            ability was tested by DruLiTo software, which shows that   is the strongest stimulator of AMPK1 whereas vindoline
            vindolinine (CID: 24148538) and Cr-1 (CID: 5315746)   (−6.2 kcal/mol) is of AMPK2.


            Volume 2 Issue 3 (2023)                         9                        https://doi.org/10.36922/gpd.0927
   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52