Page 78 - GPD-2-3
P. 78

Gene & Protein in Disease                                            Hotspots in the FOXO4: p53 interaction



            the crystal structure of the DBD of FOXO4 (PDB:3L2C)   3.2. Modeling of the interaction between DRI and
            was employed as the ligand [23,24] . For both receptor   p53-DBD
            and ligand, DNA, solvent molecules, and ions were   Based on the measured binding affinities between the
            removed, and hydrogens were added to all residues.   DRI and the equivalent L-amino acids of FOXO4, we
            For docking, the chosen binding site on the receptor   continued with the identification of potential molecular
            encompassed residues 94–148 and 238–327, while for   interaction sites. We employed computational docking
            the ligand, residues corresponding to FOXO4-DRI    to  generate  models  of  the  DRI:  p53-DBD  interaction,
            (comprising residues 93–119 of FOXO4 in 3L2C) were   utilizing the p53 DBD (PDB:3Q05) and FOXO4 DBD
            selected to form the PPI. The p53-FOXO4 pose with   (PDB:3L2C) as our initial models (Figure 3). These models
            the best complementarity between receptor and ligand   facilitated the identification of a putative binding surface
            was chosen for further analysis. Following docking,   capable of accommodating both FOXO4 and FOXO4-DRI
            the structural flexibility and large-scale conformational   (Figure 3A and B). However, the predicted conformations
            transitions of the p53-FOXO4 complex were evaluated   of these two peptides exhibited significant differences,
            using the CABS-flex 2.0 server [25] .              resulting in associated differences in predicted binding
              The docking structure of p53 complexed with FOXO4   energies – the wild-type peptide corresponding to the
            was used to generate binding modes for FOXO4-based   DRI exhibited a predicted ΔG of binding of -6.4 kcal/mol,
            peptides. First, secondary structures for the peptides were   while the DRI displayed a correspondingly higher ΔG of
            built using Chimera X’s structure building tool , ensuring   binding at -7.1 kcal/mol. In addition, our computational
                                                [26]
            proper torsions between  amino acids by referencing the   modeling of the FOXO4-DRI synthetic peptide interacting
            dynameomics  rotamer  library.  The  resulting  structures   with  the  p53  surface  yielded  a  rearranged  conformation
            were aligned with the corresponding peptide sequence   when compared to the wild-type sequence (as expected
                                                                                                           [21]
            in the FOXO4 DBD, considering its interaction with p53.   from NMR analysis of the FOXO4:p53 interaction )
            Finally, the p53-peptide complexes and the FOXO4:p53   (Figure  3C).  Upon  closer  examination  (Figure  4),  two
            complex were refined through an analysis of structural   significant  pockets  were  identified  on  the  surface  of
            flexibility and large-scale conformational transition using   p53-DBD and predicted to bind both peptides. Pocket 1
                               [25]
            the CABS-flex 2.0 server .                         (composed of amino acids Q7, K71, M76, S176, and E178)
                                                               was shallower and less extended than Pocket 2 (composed
            3. Results                                         of amino acids R17, L21, P35, A36, L37, N38, and S176)
                                                               (Figure 4).
            3.1. DRI binds significantly more tightly to p53-DBD
            than its L-amino acid equivalent                     The two pockets together constitute the predicted core
                                                               zone of the binding site for the DRI. S176 and N38 are located
            Synthetic peptides corresponding to the published   between the pockets, forming a barrier that separates the
            sequence of the DRI (FOXO4-DRI) and the equivalent   two pockets into two independent regions. This amino
            wild-type sequence (FOXO4) were generated as previously
            described. The binding affinity of these peptides against
            purified p53-DBD was measured using MST, as detailed
            earlier, generating experimental measurements of their
            binding affinity. The K  values for the peptides “FOXO4”
                              d
            and its DRI equivalent “FOXO4-DRI” are 2.5 μM and 48.4
            nM, respectively (Figure 1). The significant difference in K
                                                          d
            values between the DRI and native peptides under identical
            conditions  provides  further  evidence  that  FOXO4-DRI
            interacts with p53-DBD with high affinity. The apparent
            strength of this interaction forms the basis for the ability
            of FOXO4-DRI to effectively compete with the relatively   Figure  3.  Molecular  models  of  the  FOXO4:p53-DBD  and  FOXO4-
                                                               DRI:  p53-DBD complexes. (A) Predicted binding mode of the wild-
            weaker interactions observed between FOXO4-FHD: p53-  type FOXO4 peptide that corresponds to the FOXO4-DRI with p53-DBD
            TAD (2.19 mM), FOXO4-CR3:p53-DBD (6.96  μM), the   (peptide in green,  ΔG: −6.4 kcal/mol, K : 2.2 × 10  kcal/mol). The
                                                                                                  -5
                                                                                           d
            N-terminal region of FOXO4:p53-CRD, and FOXO4-     computational model suggests that the FOXO4 peptide interacts with 2
            DBD:  p53-DBD. In contrast, the equivalent wild-type   pockets on the surface of p53-DBD: Pocket 1 (blue) and Pocket 2 (red).
            peptide (FOX04) exhibits weaker binding affinity to p53-  (B) The predicted binding mode of the FOXO4-DRI (yellow, ΔG: −7.1
                                                               kcal/mol, K : 5.8 × 10  kcal/mol) suggests significant rearrangement of the
                                                                            -6
            DBD, thus displaying reduced competitiveness within the   FOXO4-DRI but maintains interactions with both pockets 1 and 2. (C) A
                                                                      d
            overall FOXO4:p53 complexation.                    top view of the predicted binding mode of the FOXO4-DRI shown in (B).
            Volume 2 Issue 3 (2023)                         5                        https://doi.org/10.36922/gpd.1491
   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83