Page 131 - GPD-3-4
P. 131

Gene & Protein in Disease                                      A pyroptosis-related gene signature in myeloma



            it a relatively rare cancer.  Despite being rare, MM   of pyroptosis also opens a new avenue for the development
                                   2
            accounts for a significant proportion of deaths related   of therapeutic strategies.  For example, modulating
                                                                                    19
            to hematological malignancies.  The American Cancer   pyroptosis may enhance the efficacy of immunotherapies
                                      3
            Society website (https://www.cancer.org/cancer/types/  in cancer.  Despite these advances, many questions
                                                                       20
            multiple-myeloma/about/key-statistics.html) reports that   remain to be answered. For instance, the regulation of
            there are an estimated 35,780 new myeloma cases and   gasdermin proteins and the role of pyroptosis in non-
                                                                                                      21
            approximately 12,540 myeloma-associated deaths in 2024.   pathogenic conditions are not fully understood.  Future
            Recently, significant strides have been made in both the   research will likely focus on these areas and on translating
                                             4
            understanding and management of MM.  Last decade has   the knowledge of pyroptosis into clinical applications.
            seen significant advancements in treatment against MM.    Recent research has suggested a possible interplay
                                                          5
            In addition, the advent of next-generation sequencing has   between MM and pyroptosis, opening a promising avenue
            provided insights into the molecular heterogeneity of MM,   for novel therapeutic strategies.  Pyroptosis, through
                                                                                          22
            leading to the identification of high-risk subgroups and the   the elimination of cancerous cells and the initiation of
            development of more personalized treatment strategies.    an immune response, could be leveraged to enhance the
                                                          6
            According to the Revised-International Staging System   efficacy of existing MM treatments.  Identifying prognostic
                                                                                          23
            (R-ISS) guideline, MM patients are mainly stratified into 4   biomarkers of pyroptosis in MM holds substantial potential
            risk categories, with a homogeneous repatrition, and those   to improve patient outcomes.  Such biomarkers could not
                                                                                      24
            with chromosomal alterations, including del(17p), t(4;14),   only provide insights into a patient’s likely disease course,
            t(14;16), t(14;20), gain(1q), and or gene mutations such   aiding in risk stratification and personalized treatment
            as p53 mutation, are labeled as having poor prognosis or   planning, but also reveal novel targets for therapy. In
            high-risk outcomes. The disease with two or more high risk   particular, they could identify patients who might benefit
            factors is regarded as a double- or multiple-hit myeloma,   from therapies that modulate pyroptosis, providing a new
            which may translate to poorer outcomes in the affected   approach to combat this not-yet-curable disease.  Hence,
                                                                                                      25
            patients.  However, MM remains a largely incurable   while the path to fully understanding the role of pyroptosis
                   7
            disease, with most patients experiencing relapse after   in  MM  is  undoubtedly  challenging,  it  is  one  that  holds
            initial response to therapy due to genetic heterogeneity.    immense promise for improving the lives of those affected
                                                          8
            Interestingly, in addition to traditional chromosomal   by this pathological condition. 7
            translocations and gene mutations, increased lactate
                                                                          26
            dehydrogenase (LDH) concentration is also taken into   Wang et al.  developed a prognostic risk scoring model
            consideration in the R-ISS.  LDH is an important enzyme   based on 11 pyroptosis-related genes (PRGs) from the
                                 9
            of the anaerobic metabolic pathway, and it is present in all   GSE136324 dataset. However, the small validation cohort
                                                                                                            27
            tissues and increased in the blood levels when tissues and   might affect the reliability of their findings. Zhang et al.
            cells are injured.  LDH is not only a hallmark checkpoint of   established a prognostic model using 9 out of 33 candidate
                         10
            gluconeogenesis and DNA metabolism, but also associated   PRGs, but their model lacked experimental validation.
                                                                     28
            with cell death, such as cell pyroptosis. In our recent study,   Li  et al.  proposed a 6-gene signature but it could not
            we found that LDH is strikingly increased when MM cells   distinguish between disease subgroups  in the  validation
            undergo pyroptosis. 11                             dataset. In the present study, we conducted comparisons
                                                               between MM patients and healthy controls using a larger
              Pyroptosis  acts as  a  defense  mechanism  against   sample dataset, and based on our results, we identified
            microbial infections.  It typically manifests as cell swelling,   a novel and comprehensive PRG signature that can
                            12
            membrane rupture, and the release of pro-inflammatory   effectively classify MM patients according to disease risk.
            intracellular contents, leading to an inflammatory
            response.  Over the past decade, our understanding of the   2. Materials and methods
                   13
            molecular mechanisms behind pyroptosis has significantly
            advanced.  It is now known that pyroptosis is mediated by   2.1. Data sources and processing
                    14
            a family of proteins called gasdermins, which are capable   The clinical data and PRGs of 859 MM patients were
            of forming pores in the cell membrane.  Pyroptosis is   retrieved from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-
                                              15
            increasingly recognized as playing crucial roles in various   MMRF CoMMpass project. The gene expression data
            diseases.  In infectious diseases, pyroptosis can eliminate   were standardized using the “limma” package,  a scaling
                                                                                                    29
                   16
            the intracellular replication niches of pathogens and   method to maintain data integrity and comparability.
            amplify the host immune response.  In the context of   Patients lacking clinical information (n = 17) were
                                          17
            cancer,  it  can  either  inhibit  or  promote  tumor  growth,   excluded, resulting in 842 MM patients being eligible. The
            contingent on the particular circumstances.  The discovery   “caret” package was employed to divide these patients into
                                              18
            Volume 3 Issue 4 (2024)                         2                               doi: 10.36922/gpd.4534
   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136