Page 104 - GPD-4-3
P. 104

Gene & Protein in Disease                                            Monogenic lupus and interferonopathies



            immune complex deposition. Several immune phenomena,
            such as defective regulatory T cells, impaired lymphocyte
            homeostasis, and defects in the clearance of apoptotic cells
            and immune complexes, may contribute to these features.
                                                         8,9
            Despite  remarkable  advancements  in  understanding  the
            etiopathogenesis of SLE, its precise etiology remains elusive.
            SLE is widely accepted as a polygenic, multifactorial disease
            influenced by a complex interplay of genetic, epigenetic,
            environmental, and hormonal factors. 10,11  Notably, a subset
            of patients exhibits lupus features linked to a single genetic
            mutation, classifying them as having monogenic lupus. 12-15
            Interestingly, the genetic mutations responsible for these
            pathogenic pathways lead to a robust production of IFN-I,
            which drives monogenic lupus pathogenesis by promoting
            inflammatory reactions, plasmacytoid dendritic cell
            maturation, autoreactive T and B cell activation, and tissue   Figure 1. Multiple finger contractures
            damage, similar to the phenomena proposed for polygenic
            or multifactorial lupus. 16                        included a positive direct Coombs test, pancytopenia,
                                                               elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, positive
              In this work, we explore the intersection between   antinuclear antibody (ANA), double-stranded DNA
            monogenic lupus and systemic autoinflammatory      (dsDNA) antibodies, and anti-cardiolipin antibodies
            disorders (SAIDs) by reporting two cases of monogenic   (IgG and IgM), along with a low complement (C ) level.
                                                                                                       3
            lupus that were classified as SAIDs.               Bilateral hand X-rays showed soft tissue swelling with non-
            2. Patients and methods                            erosive  deformities  of  the  fifth  fingers.  Initial  treatment
                                                               consisted of systemic corticosteroids, methotrexate, and an
            This retrospective report analyzed two monogenic lupus   anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agent (adalimumab) for
            patients  carrying  pathogenic  genetic  mutations.  Medical   3 months. Due to poor response, the anti-TNF agent was
            records were reviewed to collect demographic and clinical   switched to rituximab, which led to partial improvement,
            data, laboratory results, genetic findings, imaging and   though frequent relapses were still observed. Follow-up
            histopathology results, and therapeutic responses.  assessments revealed progressive headache and bilateral
              This study adheres to the ethical principles  outlined   papilledema. Further  laboratory assessment revealed
            in the Declaration of Helsinki (2000); the Research   a negative neuromyelitis optica antibody test. Brain
            Advisory Council guidelines of King Faisal Specialist   magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed multiple
            Hospital  and  Research  Center,  Riyadh;  and  the  Saudi   scattered patchy hyperintense lesions in the bilateral
            Arabian legislation. This work was conducted as part of   cerebral  white  matter,  with  unremarkable  intracranial
            a previously approved study (study number 2221105).   magnetic resonance angiography and magnetic resonance
            All clinical and laboratory assessments were performed   venography (Figure 2). Whole exome sequencing identified
            as part of the standard medical care. Informed consent   a homozygous c.902C>T (p.S301P) variant in the DNase II
            for genetic testing was obtained from the parents during   gene, leading to the diagnosis of monogenic lupus due to
            blood extraction, as part of patient care. All collected data   DNase II deficiency.
            were examined under confidentiality practices, ensuring   The second  case has  been previously reported.  In
                                                                                                          17
            no personal information was disclosed. Verbal consent   brief, the patient was diagnosed with monogenic lupus,
            was obtained from each patient’s parents for publication of   initially presenting with constitutional symptoms,
            their data and/or images.                          oral ulceration, polyarthritis, and myositis involving
            3. Results                                         pelvic and thigh muscles, confirmed by MRI findings.
                                                               Laboratory results showed elevated muscle enzymes, high
            The first case involves a 12-year-old boy who initially   acute-phase reactants, low complement (C  and C ) levels,
                                                                                                       4
                                                                                                 3
            presented at 3  years of  age with intermittent fever  and   and elevated ANA and dsDNA antibodies. Whole exome
            painful polyarthritis affecting the small joints of hands,   sequencing identified a homozygous splicing site, ISG15
            elbows, knees, and ankles. In addition, he exhibited   variant (c.4-1G˃A).  Table  1 presents the pathogenic
            multiple finger  contractures (Figure  1).  Other systemic   genetic variants identified in our patients with monogenic
            assessments were unremarkable. Laboratory findings   lupus.


            Volume 4 Issue 3 (2025)                         2                           doi: 10.36922/GPD025080019
   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109