Page 70 - GTM-1-1
P. 70

Global Translational Medicine                                   ctDNA in management of patients with NSCLC



            diagnostic purposes. Many studies have demonstrated the   NSCLC, ctDNA has a fast clearance, allowing for dynamic
            wide utility of ctDNA in early detection, post-operative   surveillance.  Based  on  statistical  analysis,  the  half-life  of
            minimal  residual  disease  (MRD)  detection,  surveillance   ctDNA after radical resection has been determined to be
            of subclonal evolution, and prediction of therapeutic effect   35 min, so ctDNA can be detected in real-time and used to
            (Figure 1).                                        reflect tumor burden .
                                                                               [11]
              ctDNA is present relatively low in peripheral blood. This   Histopathological examination is the gold standard
            is because on average, at each cell’s death, only 0.014% total   of NSCLC’s diagnosis, but ctDNA also shows unique
            DNA of a tumor cell is shed into the bloodstream . The   advantages over other detection methods. First, ctDNA
                                                     [6]
            detection of ctDNA is further confounded by constituent   contains the whole genome information of the tumor tissue.
            of cfDNA that originates from normal cells, especially   Tumor cells consistently release ctDNA into the circulation
            fragmented DNA from germline of hematopoietic lineage   and thus rendered as a surrogate of tumor tissue on the
            with strong metabolism, such as lymphoid and myeloid cell   grounds of the same genomic information they carry. In
            lines. This phenomenon is termed clonal hematopoiesis   late stage lung cancer, plasma ctDNA was found to possess
            of indeterminate potential, which increases with age   at least one targeted driver mutations, which is similar to
            and is the most common interference factor in ctDNA   tumor tissue at a concordance of 81.6% and 50.4% in early
            detection . The concentration of cfDNA in peripheral   stage NSCLC, probably due to low rate of ctDNA positivity
                   [7]
            blood is estimated to be 1 – 100 ng/ml but only 0.1 – 1%   in low tumor-burden individuals [12,13] . Second, ctDNA is
            of which originates from tumor tissue. The density of   capable of capturing intratumor heterogeneity. Due to
            ctDNA  is  even  lesser  in  low  tumor-burden  individuals,   the fact that the cancer cells malignantly proliferate and
            such as patients with early stage cancers or patients after   release ctDNA into bloodstream, ctDNA is able to show the
            the resection surgery [8,9] . The fragment length is another   mutation landscape of tumor tissue, especially intratumor
            characteristic that differentiate ctDNA from cfDNA of non-  subclones, which generally is not captured by the traditional
            cancerous origins. The size of cfDNA is around 166  bp,   tissue histopathological examination . In a systematic
                                                                                             [14]
            and it has been observed that ctDNA is 23 bp shorter than   comparative sequencing analysis among Tracking Non-
            normal cfDNA in plasma. cfDNA shows strong relation to   Small-Cell Lung Cancer Evolution Through Therapy (Rx)
            nucleosome and core histones and is conferred protection   (TRACERx) cohort conducted by Abbosh et al., intratumor
            from endonuclease, while ctDNA presented a more    single nucleotide variants (SNVs) were identified in ctDNA
            fragmented pattern. However, the underlying reason for   in 59% patients with early stage NSCLC . Thirdly, ctDNA
                                                                                              [15]
            these differences remains unknown . In patients with   enables dynamic monitoring of post-operative residual
                                         [10]
            Table 1. Research progress on the application of ctDNA in the treatment process in NSCLC patients
            Author/Ref.   Year       ctDNA assay        Number of   TNM stage of   Early   Prognostic   Prediction of
                                                      patients involved  patients  detection  evaluation  therapeutic effect
            Cohen et al. [41]  2018  Cancer-SEEK          1850       Pan cancer   √
            Newman et al. [42]  2014  CAPP-Seq             407         I~IV       √
                                   (139 mutated genes)
            Chabon et al. [43]  2020  Lung-CLip (255 mutated genes)  160  I~III   √        √
            Abbosh et al. [15]  2017  WES-PCR (personalized based   100  I~III    √        √
                                      on 16 SNVs)      First European
                                                          cohort
            Chaudhuri et al. [56]  2017  CAPP-Seq (128 mutated genes)  40  IB~III          √
                                                        First North
                                                       America cohort
            Chen et al. [11]  2019  cSMART (9 genes)       36          I~III               √
                                                       First East Asian
                                                          cohort
            Qiu et al. [76]  2021  NGS-panel (139 genes)   91          I~IV                √
            Nabet et al. [64]  2020  DIRect-On (ctDNA on   94       Unresectable                      √
                                treatment and immunotherapy           IIIB~IV
                                       response)
            Moding et al. [65]  2020  CAPP-Seq (97 mutated genes)  65  Unresectable                   √
                                                                      IIB~IIIB

            Volume 1 Issue 1 (2022)                         3                       https://doi.org/10.36922/gtm.v1i1.96
   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75