Page 16 - GTM-2-2
P. 16

Global Translational Medicine                                                  Clinical algorithms in ART



            Consent for publication                               afterload techniques of embryo transfer.  Hum Reprod,
                                                                  36: 2484–2492.
              Not applicable.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab178
            Availability of data                               11.  Scott  RT  Jr., de  Ziegler D, 2020,  Introduction:  Key

              Not applicable.                                     performance  indicators  in  assisted  reproductive
                                                                  technologies. Fertil Steril, 114: 4–5.
            References                                            https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.04.057

            1.   Carson SA, Kallen AN, 2021, Diagnosis and management of   12.  Vaiarelli A, Zacà C, Spadoni V,  et al., 2023, Clinical and
               infertility: A review. JAMA, 326: 65–76.           laboratory key performance indicators in IVF: A consensus
               https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.4788             between the  Italian Society of  Fertility  and  Sterility and
                                                                  Reproductive Medicine (SIFES-MR) and the Italian Society
            2.   Aimagambetova  G,  Issanov  A,  Terzic  S,  et al.,  2020,  The   of Embryology, Reproduction and Research (SIERR).
               effect of psychological distress on IVF outcomes: Reality or   J Assist Reprod Genet.
               speculations? PLoS One, 15: e0242024.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-023-02792-1
               https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242024
                                                               13.  Vitagliano A, Paffoni A, Viganò P, 2023, Does maternal age
            3.  Available  from:  https://worldpopulationreview.com/  affect Assisted Reproduction Technology success rates after
               country-rankings/total-fertility-rate [Last accessed on 2023   euploid embryo transfer? A systematic review and meta-
               May 24].
                                                                  analysis. Fertil Steril,  S0015-0282(23)00169-3.
            4.   Borumandnia N, Majd HA, Khadembashi N,  et al., 2021,      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.02.036
               Assessing  the  trend  of  infertility  rate  in  198  countries  and
               territories in last decades. Iran J Public Health, 50: 1735–1737.   14.  Available from: https://www.sart.org [Last accessed on 2023
                                                                  May 24].
               https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v50i8.6840
                                                               15.  Vollset SE, Goren E, Yuan CW, et al., 2020, Fertility, mortality,
            5.   Fauser BC, 2019, Towards the global coverage of a unified
               registry of IVF outcomes. Reprod Biomed Online, 38: 133–137.   migration, and population scenarios for 195 countries and
                                                                  territories from 2017 to 2100: A forecasting analysis for the
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.12.001         Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet, 396: 1285–1306.
            6.   Bosch E, Bulletti C, Copperman AB, et al., 2019, How time      https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30677-2
               to healthy singleton delivery could affect decision-making
               during infertility treatment: A  Delphi consensus.  Reprod   16.  Kieslinger DC, Vergouw CG, Ramos L, et al., 2023, Clinical
               Biomed Online, 38: 118–130.                        outcomes of uninterrupted embryo culture with or without
                                                                  time-lapse-based embryo selection versus interrupted
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.09.019         standard culture (SelecTIMO): A three-armed, multicentre,
            7.   Vaiarelli  A,  Cimadomo  D,  Trabucco  E,  et al.,  2018,   double-blind,  randomised  controlled trial.  Lancet,
               Double stimulation in the same ovarian cycle (DuoStim)   401: 1438–1446.
               to maximize the number of oocytes retrieved from poor      https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00168-X
               prognosis patients: A  multicenter experience and SWOT
               analysis. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 9: 317.   17.  Bulletti C, Coccia ME, Battistoni S, et al., 2010, Endometriosis
                                                                  and infertility. J Assist Reprod Genet, 27: 441–447.
               https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00317
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-010-9436-1
            8.   Scaravelli G, Zacà C, Setti PE,  et  al., 2021, Fertilization
               rate  as  a  novel  indicator  for  cumulative  live  birth  rate:   18.  De Ziegler D, Pirtea P, Carbonnel M, et al., 2019, Assisted
               A multicenter retrospective cohort study of 9,394 complete   reproduction in endometriosis.  Best Pract Res  Clin
               in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril, 116: 766–773.   Endocrinol Metab, 33: 47–59.
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.04.006     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2018.10.001
            9.   Jin H, Shen X, Song W,  et al., 2021, The development of   19.  Ottolina J, Vignali M, Papaleo E, et al., 2022, Surgery versus
               nomograms to predict blastulation rate following cycles of   IVF for the treatment of infertility associated to ovarian
               in vitro fertilization in patients with tubal factor infertility,   and deep endometriosis (SVIDOE: Surgery Versus IVF for
               polycystic ovary syndrome, or endometriosis.  Front   Deep and Ovarian Endometriosis). Clinical protocol for
               Endocrinol (Lausanne), 12: 751373.                 a multicenter randomized controlled trial.  PLoS One, 17:
                                                                  e0271173.
               https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.751373
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271173
            10.  Setti PE, Cirillo F, Morenghi E, et al., 2021. One step further:
               Randomised single-centre trial comparing the direct and   20.  Surrey E, Soliman AM, Trenz H,  et al., 2020, Impact of


            Volume 2 Issue 2 (2023)                         10                       https://doi.org/10.36922/gtm.0308
   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21