Page 91 - GTM-2-4
P. 91

Global Translational Medicine                                 Prognosis of relapse in squamous cell lung cancer



               review. Int J Clin Exp Pathol, 7: 3632–3646.       for assessment of therapy response in non-small cell lung
                                                                  cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Cancer,
            16.  Zissimopoulos A, Stellos K, Permenopoulou V, et al., 2007,
               The importance of the tumor marker CYFRA 21–1 in   116: 1037–1045.
               patients with lung cancer after surgery or chemotherapy.      https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.45
               Hell J Nucl Med, 10: 62–66.
                                                               25.  Takeuchi S, Nonaka M, Kadokura M, et al., 2003, Prognostic
            17.  Yeh JJ, Liu FY, Hsu WH, et al., 2002, Monitoring cytokeratin   significance of serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen in
               fragment 19 (CYFRA 21–1) serum levels for early    surgically treated lung cancer. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg,
               prediction of recurrence of adenocarcinoma and squamous   9: 98–104. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12732086
               cell  carcinoma  in  the lung after  surgical  resection.  Lung,   26.  Chen IH, Liao CT, Wang HM, et al., 2014, Using SCC antigen
               180: 273–279.
                                                                  and CRP levels as prognostic biomarkers in recurrent oral
               https://doi.org/10.1007/s004080000101              cavity squamous cell carcinoma. PLoS One, 9: e103265.
            18.  Sawabata N, Maeda H, Yokota S, et al., 2004, Postoperative      https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103265
               serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels in patients   27.  Choi KH, Lee SW, Yu M, et al., 2019, Significance of elevated
               with pathologic stage IA nonsmall cell lung carcinoma:   SCC-Ag level on tumor recurrence and patient survival
               Subnormal levels as an indicator of favorable prognosis.
               Cancer, 101: 803–809.                              in patients with squamous-cell carcinoma of uterine
                                                                  cervix following definitive chemoradiotherapy: A  multi-
               https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20421                 institutional analysis. J Gynecol Oncol, 30: e1.
            19.  Ozeki  N,  Fukui  T,  Taniguchi  T,  et al.,  2014,  Significance      https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e1
               of the serum carcinoembryonic antigen level during the
               follow-up of patients with completely resected non-small-  28.  Deng Z, Hasegawa M, Yamashita Y, et al., 2012, Prognostic
               cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 45: 687–692.   value of human papillomavirus and squamous cell carcinoma
                                                                  antigen in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer
               https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezt424               Sci, 103: 2127–2134.
            20.  Duan X, Cui Y, Li H, et al., 2015, High preoperative and      https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.12009
               postoperative levels of carcinoembryonic antigen and
               CYFRA  21–1  indicate  poor  prognosis  in  patients  with   29.  Bresalier RS, Grady WM, Markowitz SD,  et al., 2020,
               pathological Stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer.  Indian J   Biomarkers for Early Detection of colorectal cancer: The
               Cancer, 52: E158–E163.                             early detection research network, a framework for clinical
                                                                  translation. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 29: 2431–2440.
               https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-509X.186564
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-20-0234
            21.  Barak V, Holdenrieder S, Nisman B, et al., 2010, Relevance
               of circulating biomarkers for the therapy monitoring and   30.  Sjoberg DD, Vickers AJ, Assel M, et al., 2018, Twenty-year risk
               follow-up investigations in patients with non-small cell lung   of prostate cancer death by midlife prostate-specific antigen
               cancer. Cancer Biomark, 6: 191–196.                and a panel of four kallikrein markers in a large population-
                                                                  based cohort of healthy men. Eur Urol, 73: 941–948.
               https://doi.org/10.3233/CBM-2009-0129
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.02.016
            22.  Muley T, He Y, Rolny V,  et  al., 2019, Potential for the
               blood-based biomarkers cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA   31.  Monroy-Iglesias MJ, Crescioli S, Beckmann K, et al., 2022,
               21–1) and human epididymal protein 4 (HE4) to detect   Antibodies as biomarkers for cancer risk: A  systematic
               recurrence during monitoring after surgical resection of   review. Clin Exp Immunol, 209: 46–63.
               adenocarcinoma of the lung. Lung Cancer, 130: 194–200.      https://doi.org/10.1093/cei/uxac030
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.02.017   32.  Blanco-Prieto S, De Chiara L, Rodríguez-Girondo M, et al.,
                                                                  2017, Highly Sensitive Marker Panel for Guidance in Lung
            23.  Pang L, Wang J, Jiang Y,  et al., 2013, Decreased levels of
               serum cytokeratin 19 fragment CYFRA 21–1 predict   Cancer Rapid Diagnostic Units. Sci Rep, 7: 41151.
               objective response to chemotherapy in patients with non-     https://doi.org/10.1038/srep41151
               small cell lung cancer. Exp Ther Med, 6: 355–360.
                                                               33.  Fahrmann JF, Marsh T, Irajizad E,  et al., 2022, Blood-
               https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2013.1171              Based Biomarker Panel for Personalized Lung Cancer Risk
                                                                  Assessment. J Clin Oncol, 40: 876–883.
            24.  Holdenrieder S, Wehnl B, Hettwer K,  et al., 2017,
               Carcinoembryonic antigen and cytokeratin-19 fragments      https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.01460








            Volume 2 Issue 4 (2023)                         12                        https://doi.org/10.36922/gtm.2209
   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96