Page 22 - GTM-3-1
P. 22

Global Translational Medicine                                           Role of HTS in cancer therapeutics



            Availability of data                                  2017;69(4):479‑496.

            Not applicable.                                       doi: 10.1124/pr.117.013755
                                                               12.  Woodward AA, Urbanowicz RJ, Naj AC, Moore JH. Genetic
             References                                           heterogeneity:  Challenges,  impacts,  and  methods  through
            1.   Macarron R, Banks MN, Bojanic D, et al. Impact of high-  an associative lens. Genet Epidemiol. 2022;46(8):555‑571.
               throughput screening in biomedical research. Nat Rev Drug      doi: 10.1002/gepi.22497
               Discov. 2011;10(3):188‑195.
                                                               13.  Lawson  ARJ,  Abascal  F,  Coorens  THH,  et al.  Extensive
               doi: 10.1038/nrd3368                               heterogeneity in somatic mutation and selection in the

            2.   Wigglesworth MJ, Murray DC, Blackett CJ, Kossenjans M,   human bladder. Science. 2020;370(6512):75‑82.
               Nissink JW. Increasing the delivery of next generation      doi: 10.1126/science.aba8347
               therapeutics from high throughput screening libraries. Curr
               Opin Chem Biol. 2015;26:104‑110.                14.  Murphy N, Ward HA, Jenab M,  et  al. Heterogeneity of
                                                                  colorectal cancer risk factors by anatomical subsite in 10
               doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2015.04.006                    European  countries:  A  multinational  cohort  study.  Clin
            3.   Pereira  DA,  Williams JA.  Origin  and  evolution  of  high   Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17(7):1323‑1331.e6.
               throughput screening. Br J Pharmacol. 2007;152(1):53‑61.     doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.07.030
               doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0707373                     15.  Haffner  MC,  Zwart  W,  Roudier  MP,  et al. Genomic and
            4.   Shun  TY,  Lazo  JS,  Sharlow  ER,  Johnston  PA.  Identifying   phenotypic heterogeneity in prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol.
               actives  from  HTS  data  sets:  Practical  approaches  for  the   2021;18(2):79‑92.
               selection of an appropriate HTS data-processing method      doi: 10.1038/s41585‑020‑00400‑w
               and quality control review. J Biomol Screen. 2011;16(1):1‑14.
                                                               16.  Mitelpunkt A, Galili T, Kozlovski T, et al. Novel Alzheimer’s
               doi: 10.1177/1087057110389039                      disease  subtypes  identified  using  a  data  and  knowledge
            5.   Dreiman GHS, Bictash M, Fish PV, Griffin L, Svensson F.   driven strategy. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1327.
               Changing the HTS paradigm: AI‑driven iterative screening      doi: 10.1038/s41598‑020‑57785‑2
               for hit finding. SLAS Discov. 2021;26(2):257‑262.
                                                               17.  Margineanu DG. Systems biology, complexity, and the
               doi: 10.1177/2472555220949495                      impact on antiepileptic drug discovery.  Epilepsy Behav.
            6.   Tsoli M, Wadham C, Pinese M, et al. Integration of genomics,   2014;38:131‑142.
               high throughput drug screening, and personalized xenograft      doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2013.08.029
               models as a novel precision medicine paradigm for high risk
               pediatric cancer. Cancer Biol Ther. 2018;19(12):1078‑1087.  18.  Kell  DB.  Finding  novel  pharmaceuticals  in  the  systems
                                                                  biology  era  using multiple  effective  drug  targets,
               doi: 10.1080/15384047.2018.1491498                 phenotypic  screening  and  knowledge  of  transporters:
            7.   Mayr  LM,  Bojanic  D.  Novel  trends  in  high‑throughput   where drug discovery went wrong and how to fix it. FEBS J.
               screening. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2009;9(5):580‑588.  2013;280(23):5957‑5980.
               doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2009.08.004                    doi: 10.1111/febs.12268
            8.   Szymański P, Markowicz M, Mikiciuk-Olasik E. Adaptation   19.  Ericson  E,  Gebbia  M,  Heisler  LE,  et al. Off-target effects
               of high-throughput screening in drug discovery-toxicological   of psychoactive drugs revealed by genome-wide assays in
               screening tests. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13(1):427‑452.  yeast. PLoS Genet. 2008;4(8):e1000151.
               doi: 10.3390/ijms13010427                          doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000151
            9.   Milinkovic A, Martínez E. Nevirapine in the treatment of   20.  Lim  H,  Poleksic  A,  Yao  Y,  et al.  Large‑scale  off‑target
               HIV. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2004;2(3):367‑373.  identification using fast and accurate dual regularized
                                                                  one-class collaborative filtering and its application to drug
               doi: 10.1586/14787210.2.3.367
                                                                  repurposing. PLoS Comput Biol. 2016;12(10):e1005135.
            10.  FDA. Approved Drugs Generated from High Throughput
               Screening Efforts I ‑ 20190719. Rome: FDA; 2019.     doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005135
                                                               21.  Lin A, Giuliano CJ, Palladino A, et al. Off-target toxicity is a
            11.  Coussens  NP,  Braisted  JC,  Peryea  T,  Sittampalam  GS,
               Simeonov A, Hall MD. Small‑molecule screens: A gateway   common mechanism of action of cancer drugs undergoing
               to cancer therapeutic agents with case studies of food and   clinical trials. Sci Transl Med. 2019;11(509):eaaw8412.
               drug administration-approved drugs.  Pharmacol  Rev.      doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaw8412



            Volume 3 Issue 1 (2024)                         14                       https://doi.org/10.36922/gtm.2448
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27