Page 25 - GTM-3-1
P. 25

Global Translational Medicine                                           Role of HTS in cancer therapeutics



            66.  Beck  V,  Pfitscher  A,  Jungbauer  A.  GFP‑reporter  for  a   77.  Zlitni S, Blanchard JE, Brown ED. High‑throughput screening
               high throughput assay to monitor estrogenic compounds.   of model bacteria. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;486:13‑27.
               J Biochem Biophys Methods. 2005;64(1):19‑37.
                                                               78.  Hong CC. Large‑scale small‑molecule screen using zebrafish
               doi: 10.1016/j.jbbm.2005.05.001                    embryos. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;486:43‑55.
            67.  Yarrow  JC,  Totsukawa  G,  Charras  GT,  Mitchison  TJ.      doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑60327‑545‑3_4
               Screening for  cell  migration  inhibitors via  automated
               microscopy reveals a Rho-kinase inhibitor.  Chem  Biol.   79.  Zon LI, Peterson RT. In vivo drug discovery in the zebrafish.
               2005;12(3):385‑395.                                Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005;4(1):35‑44.
               doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2005.01.015                doi: 10.1038/nrd1606
            68.  Vincent  F,  Loria  P,  Pregel  M,  et al. Developing predictive   80.  O’Rourke  EJ,  Conery  AL,  Moy  TI.  Whole‑animal  high‑
               assays: The phenotypic screening “rule of 3”. Sci Transl Med.   throughput screens: The C. elegans model. Methods Mol Biol.
               2015;7(293):293ps15.                               2009;486:57‑75.
               doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aab1201                  doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑60327‑545‑3_5
            69.  Engle SJ, Vincent F. Small molecule screening in human   81.  Agee  A,  Carter  D.  Whole‑organism  screening:  Plants.
               induced pluripotent stem cell-derived terminal cell types.   Methods Mol Biol. 2009;486:77‑95.
               J Biol Chem. 2014;289(8):4562‑4570.                doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑60327‑545‑3_6
               doi: 10.1074/jbc.R113.529156                    82.  Norambuena L, Raikhel NV, Hicks GR. Chemical genomics
            70.  McNeish J, Roach M, Hambor J,  et al. High-throughput   approaches in plant biology. Plant Syst Biol. 2009;553:345‑354.
               screening in embryonic stem cell-derived neurons      doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑60327‑563‑7_18
               identifies potentiators of α-amino-3-hydroxyl-5-methyl-4-
               isoxazolepropionate-type glutamate receptors. J Biol Chem.   83.  Stern HM, Murphey RD, Shepard JL, et al. Small molecules
               2010;285(22):17209‑17217.                          that delay S phase suppress a zebrafish bmyb mutant. Nat
                                                                  Chem Biol. 2005;1(7):366‑370.
               doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.098814
                                                                  doi: 10.1038/nchembio749
            71.  Ashlock MA, Olson ER. Therapeutics development for
               cystic fibrosis: A successful model for a multisystem genetic   84.  Hong  CC,  Peterson  QP,  Hong  JY,  Peterson  RT.  Artery/vein
               disease. Annu Rev Med. 2011;62:107‑125.            specification is governed by opposing phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase
                                                                  and MAP kinase/ERK signaling. Curr Biol. 2006;16(13):1366‑1372.
               doi: 10.1146/annurev‑med‑061509‑131034
                                                                  doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.05.046
            72.  Van Goor F, Hadida S, Grootenhuis PDJ, et al. Correction
               of the F508del‑CFTR protein processing defect in vitro by   85.  Swinney  DC.  The  value  of  translational  biomarkers  to
               the investigational drug VX‑809. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.   phenotypic assays. Front Pharmacol. 2014;5:171.
               2011;108(46):18843‑18848.
                                                                  doi: 10.3389/fphar.2014.00171
               doi: 10.1073/pnas.1105787108
                                                               86.  Ioannidis JP. Biomarker failures. Clin Chem. 2013;59(1):202‑204.
            73.  Lee  G,  Ramirez  CN,  Kim  H,  et al.  Large‑scale  screening
               using familial dysautonomia induced pluripotent stem cells      doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2012.185801
               identifies compounds that rescue IKBKAP expression. Nat   87.  Chau  CH,  Rixe  O,  McLeod  H,  Figg  WD.  Validation  of
               Biotechnol. 2012;30(12):1244‑1248.                 analytic methods for biomarkers used in drug development.
               doi: 10.1038/nbt.2435                              Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(19):5967‑5976.
            74.  Barberis A, Gunde T, Berset C, Audetat S, Lüthi U. Yeast as a      doi: 10.1158/1078‑0432.Ccr‑07‑4535
               screening tool. Drug Discov Today Technol. 2005;2(2):187‑192.  88.  Spreafico  R,  Soriaga  LB,  Grosse  J,  Virgin  HW,  Telenti  A.
               doi: 10.1016/j.ddtec.2005.05.022                   Advances in genomics for drug development. Genes (Basel).
                                                                  2020;11(8):942.
            75.  Balgi  AD,  Roberge  M.  Screening  for  chemical  inhibitors
               of heterologous proteins expressed in yeast using a simple      doi:10.3390/genes11080942
               growth-restoration assay. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;486:125‑137.  89.  Guo JB, Li XJ. Impacts of modern biology on drug discovery.
               doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑60327‑545‑3_9                   Sheng Li Ke Xue Jin Zhan. 2007;38(1):25‑31.
            76.  Puri  AW,  Bogyo  M.  Using  small  molecules  to  dissect   90.  Hong AL, Tseng YY, Cowley GS, et al. Integrated genetic and
               mechanisms of microbial pathogenesis.  ACS Chem Biol.   pharmacologic interrogation of rare cancers. Nat Commun.
               2009;4(8):603‑616.                                 2016;7:11987.
               doi: 10.1021/cb9001409                             doi: 10.1038/ncomms11987


            Volume 3 Issue 1 (2024)                         17                       https://doi.org/10.36922/gtm.2448
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30