Page 26 - GTM-3-1
P. 26

Global Translational Medicine                                           Role of HTS in cancer therapeutics



            91.  Lin X, Huang XP, Chen G, et al. Life beyond kinases: Structure‑  102.  Van’t Veer LJ, Bernards R. Enabling personalized cancer
               based discovery of sorafenib as nanomolar antagonist of   medicine through analysis of gene-expression patterns.
               5-HT receptors. J Med Chem. 2012;55(12):5749‑5759.   Nature. 2008;452(7187):564‑570.
               doi: 10.1021/jm300338m                               doi: 10.1038/nature06915
            92.  Schneidewind  T,  Brause  A,  Pahl  A,  et al. Morphological   103.  Bertos NR, Park M. Breast cancer‑one term, many entities?
               profiling identifies a common mode of action for     J Clin Invest. 2011;121(10):3789‑3796.
               small molecules with different targets.  Chembiochem.
               2020;21(22):3197‑3207.                               doi: 10.1172/JCI57100
                                                               104.  Huang E, Ishida S, Pittman J, et al. Gene expression
               doi: 10.1002/cbic.202000381
                                                                    phenotypic models that predict the activity of oncogenic
            93.  Han X, Zhou C, Jiang M, et al. Discovery of RG7834: The   pathways. Nat Genet. 2003;34(2):226‑230.
               first-in-class selective and orally available small molecule
               hepatitis B virus expression inhibitor with novel mechanism      doi: 10.1038/ng1167
               of action. J Med Chem. 2018;61(23):10619‑10634.  105.  Loboda  A,  Nebozhyn  M,  Klinghoffer  R,  et  al.  A  gene
               doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.8b01245                    expression signature of RAS pathway dependence predicts
                                                                    response to PI3K and RAS pathway inhibitors and expands
            94.  Moffat  JG,  Vincent  F,  Lee  JA,  Eder  J,  Prunotto  M.   the  population  of  RAS  pathway  activated  tumors.  BMC
               Opportunities  and  challenges  in  phenotypic  drug   Med Genomics. 2010;3(1):26.
               discovery: An industry perspective. Nat Rev Drug Discov.
               2017;16(8):531‑543.                                  doi: 10.1186/1755‑8794‑3‑26
               doi: 10.1038/nrd.2017.111                       106.  Loboda A, Nebozhyn MV, Watters JW, et al. EMT is the
                                                                    dominant  program  in  human  colon  cancer.  BMC  Med
            95.  Vincent  F,  Loria  PM,  Weston  AD,  et  al. Hit triage and   Genomics. 2011;4(1):9.
               validation  in  phenotypic  screening:  Considerations  and
               strategies. Cell Chem Biol. 2020;27(11):1332‑1346.     doi: 10.1186/1755‑8794‑4‑9
               doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2020.08.009             107.  Méndez‑Lucio  O,  Naveja  JJ,  Vite‑Caritino  H,  Prieto‑
                                                                    Martínez FD, Medina‑Franco JL. One drug for multiple
            96.  Warchal  SJ,  Unciti‑Broceta  A,  Carragher  NO.  Next‑  targets:  A  computational  perspective.  J  Mex  Chem  Soc.
               generation phenotypic screening.  Future Med  Chem.   2016;60(3):168‑181.
               2016;8(11):1331‑1347.
                                                                    doi: 10.29356/jmcs.v60i3.100
               doi: 10.4155/fmc‑2016‑0025
                                                               108.  Hsieh  JH,  Smith‑Roe  SL,  Huang  R,  et  al.  Identifying
            97.  Comess  KM,  McLoughlin  SM,  Oyer  JA,  et al. Emerging   compounds  with  genotoxicity  potential  using  Tox21
               approaches for the identification of protein targets of   high‑throughput  screening  assays.  Chem  Res  Toxicol.
               small molecules-a practitioners’ perspective. J Med Chem.   2019;32(7):1384‑1401.
               2018;61(19):8504‑8535.
                                                                    doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00053
               doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01921
                                                               109.  Michod D, Widmann C. DNA‑damage sensitizers: Potential
            98.  Lee J, Bogyo M. Target deconvolution techniques in modern   new  therapeutical  tools  to  improve  chemotherapy.  Crit
               phenotypic profiling. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2013;17(1):118‑126.  Rev Oncol Hematol. 2007;63(2):160‑171.
               doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2012.12.022                      doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2007.04.003
            99.  Lu  JJ,  Pan  W,  Hu  YJ,  Wang  YT.  Multi‑target  drugs:  the   110.  Evans TJ, Yamamoto KN, Hirota K, Takeda S. Mutant cells
               trend of drug research and development.  PLoS One.   defective in DNA repair pathways provide a sensitive high-
               2012;7(6):e40262.                                    throughput assay for genotoxicity. DNA Repair (Amst).
               doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040262                    2010;9(12):1292‑1298.
            100.  Rena G, Hardie DG, Pearson ER. The mechanisms of      doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2010.09.017
                 action of metformin. Diabetologia. 2017;60(9):1577‑1585.
                                                               111.  Ji K, Kogame T, Choi K, et al. A novel approach using DNA‑
                 doi: 10.1007/s00125‑017‑4342‑z                     repair-deficient chicken DT40 cell lines for screening and
                                                                    characterizing the genotoxicity of environmental contaminants.
            101.  Keller MP, Attie AD. Physiological insights gained from
                 gene expression analysis in obesity and diabetes. Annu Rev   Environ Health Perspect. 2009;117(11):1737‑1744.
                 Nutr. 2010;30:341‑364.                             doi: 10.1289/ehp.0900842
                 doi: 10.1146/annurev.nutr.012809.104747       112.  Buerstedde  JM,  Takeda  S.  Increased  ratio  of  targeted  to





            Volume 3 Issue 1 (2024)                         18                       https://doi.org/10.36922/gtm.2448
   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31