Page 37 - GTM-3-3

Global Translational Medicine Computational advances in cancer liquid biopsy

stemness and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition features Cell. 2019;73(6):1292-1305.e8.
are chemoresistant and predictive of poor outcome in doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.01.009
metastatic breast cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2019;18(2):437-447.
92. Cortés-López M, Chamely P, Hawkins AG, et al. Single-cell
doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-18-0584
multi-omics defines the cell-type-specific impact of splicing
82. Negishi R, Yamakawa H, Kobayashi T, et al. Transcriptomic aberrations in human hematopoietic clonal outgrowths. Cell
profiling of single circulating tumor cells provides insight Stem Cell. 2023;30(9): 1262-1281.
into human metastatic gastric cancer. Commun Biol. 93. Belhocine K, DeMare L, Habern O. Single-cell multiomics:
2022;5(1):20. Simultaneous epigenetic and transcriptional profiling:
doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02937-x 10x Genomics shares experimental planning and sample
preparation tips for the chromium single cell multiome
83. Ring A, Mineyev N, Zhu W, et al. EpCAM based capture ATAC + gene expression system. Genet Eng Biotechnol News.
detects and recovers circulating tumor cells from all 2021;41(1):66-68.
subtypes of breast cancer except claudin-low. Oncotarget.
2015;6(42):44623-44634. doi: 10.1089/gen.41.01.17
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5977 94. Zhong W, Gummesson A, Tebani A, et al. Whole-genome
sequence association analysis of blood proteins in a
84. Wolf FA, Angerer P, Theis FJ. SCANPY: Large-scale longitudinal wellness cohort. Genome Med. 2020;12(1):53.
single-cell gene expression data analysis. Genome Biol.
2018;19(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13073-020-00755-0
doi: 10.1186/s13059-017-1382-0 95. Enroth S, Johansson Å, Enroth SB, Gyllensten U. Strong
effects of genetic and lifestyle factors on biomarker
85. Satija R, Farrell JA, Gennert D, Schier AF, Regev A. Spatial variation and use of personalized cutoffs. Nat Commun.
reconstruction of single-cell gene expression data. Nat 2014;5(1):4684.
Biotechnol. 2015;33(5):495-502.
doi: 10.1038/ncomms5684
doi: 10.1038/nbt.3192
96. Ding Z, Wang N, Ji N, Chen ZS. Proteomics technologies for
86. Serin Harmanci A, Harmanci AO, Zhou X. CaSpER cancer liquid biopsies. Mol Cancer. 2022;21(1):53.
identifies and visualizes CNV events by integrative analysis
of single-cell or bulk RNA-sequencing data. Nat Commun. doi: 10.1186/s12943-022-01526-8
2020;11(1):89. 97. Landegren U, Hammond M. Cancer diagnostics based
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13779-x on plasma protein biomarkers: Hard times but great
expectations. Mol Oncol. 2021;15(6):1715-1726.
87. Bařinka J, Hu Z, Wang L, et al. RNAseqCNV: Analysis of
large-scale copy number variations from RNA-seq data. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12809
Leukemia. 2022;36(6):1492-1498. 98. Feng W, Beer JC, Hao Q, et al. NULISA: A proteomic
doi: 10.1038/s41375-022-01547-8 liquid biopsy platform with attomolar sensitivity and high
multiplexing. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):7238.
88. Gao R, Bai S, Henderson YC, et al. Delineating copy number
and clonal substructure in human tumors from single-cell doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42834-x
transcriptomes. Nat Biotechnol. 2021;39(5):599-608. 99. Wolf J, Rasmussen DK, Sun YJ, et al. Liquid-biopsy proteomics
doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-00795-2 combined with AI identifies cellular drivers of eye aging and
disease in vivo. Cell. 2023;186(22):4868-4884.e12.
89. Hou Y, Guo H, Cao C, et al. Single-cell triple omics
sequencing reveals genetic, epigenetic, and transcriptomic doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.09.012
heterogeneity in hepatocellular carcinomas. Cell Res. 100. Zhao T, Chiang ZD, Morriss JW, et al. Spatial genomics
2016;26(3):304-319. enables multi-modal study of clonal heterogeneity in tissues.
doi: 10.1038/cr.2016.23 Nature. 2022;601(7891):85-91.
90. Han KY, Kim KT, Joung JG, et al. SIDR: Simultaneous doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04217-4
isolation and parallel sequencing of genomic DNA and total 101. He S, Bhatt R, Brown C, et al. High-plex imaging of RNA and
RNA from single cells. Genome Res. 2018;28(1):75-87. proteins at subcellular resolution in fixed tissue by spatial
molecular imaging. Nat Biotechnol. 2022;40(12):1794-1806.
doi: 10.1101/gr.223263.117
doi: 10.1038/s41587-022-01483-z
91. Rodriguez-Meira A, Buck G, Clark SA, et al. Unravelling
intratumoral heterogeneity through high-sensitivity single- 102. Zhang D, Deng Y, Kukanja P, et al. Spatial epigenome-
cell mutational analysis and parallel RNA sequencing. Mol transcriptome co-profiling of mammalian tissues. Nature.

Volume 3 Issue 3 (2024) 14 doi: 10.36922/gtm.3063