Page 15 - IJAMD-2-3
P. 15

International Journal of AI for
            Materials and Design                                                   AI applications in composite materials



            coefficients, and strain inputs, and showed improved   extract spatial information from RVE images, which was
            prediction accuracy compared to backpropagation    then converted into sequences and fed into the LSTM
            neural  network and random forest models. RNNs have   to predict the stress at each time step. CNN-RNN-based
            also been employed to predict the shape transformation   models have also been applied to predict the evolution
            of 4D-printed active composite structures. Sun  et al.    of surface roughness in carbon/carbon composites under
                                                         73
            designed an active composite beam using materials with   thermochemical ablation  and to assess damage in
                                                                                    83
            different coefficients of thermal expansion and treated   composites subjected to low-velocity impacts.  According
                                                                                                   85
            the material distribution as sequential data. By applying   to a study by Truong et al.,  combining CNN with GRU
                                                                                     84
            an RNN model, they successfully predicted the resulting   yielded the highest prediction accuracy compared to using
            shape under a stimulus of a 100°C temperature increase,   CNN, RNN, GRU, or LSTM individually.
            achieving over 2000 times faster performance compared   Moreover, traditional RNNs are less robust to new
            to conventional finite element simulations. In addition,   conditions due to the absence of physically derived patterns,
            to enhance the performance of RNNs, bidirectional
            RNNs – which process input sequences in both forward   which prompted a series of studies to explore physically
            and backward directions – have been employed in studies   RNN (PRNN) models that incorporate physical constraints
                                                                                                       69
                                                                                           69,86
            to identify the location and size of defects in laminated   directly into the RNN architecture.   Maia et al.  aimed
            composites  and to efficiently predict the time-dependent   to predict the path- and rate-dependent stress responses
                     77
            damage of composite hydrogen tanks. 78             of composites by embedding the constitutive models into
                                                               the material layer of the PRNN, as shown in  Figure  5F.
              However, RNNs require a large amount of data for   This approach enabled them to incorporate the non-linear
            training and are difficult to capture spatial patterns   elasto-viscoplastic, path- and rate-dependent behavior of
            compared to CNNs. To address these limitations, recent   the matrix, as well as the nonlinear elastic and anisotropic
            studies have explored combining RNNs with techniques   characteristics of the fibers, into the RNN architecture.
            such as transfer learning 67,79-82  and CNNs. 68,83-85  Cheung   As a result, the model accurately predicted stresses with a
            et al.  combined transfer learning with a GRU-based DL   mean absolute error of 5–7 MPa and a relative error within
                67
            model to reduce the computational cost of predicting the   5–10% under various loading conditions, and was also
            nonlinear elasto-plastic behavior of short fiber reinforced   used to successfully extrapolate to loading conditions not
            composites,  as  shown  in  Figure  5D.  In  this  approach,  a   included in the training data.
            mean-field-based RNN model was used with low-fidelity
            samples, while high-fidelity full-field simulation data were   2.4. Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs)
            employed for fine-tuning. As a result, they successfully   DNNs accurately represent the relationship between the
            developed a framework with excellent computational   given inputs and outputs based on large-scale labeled
            efficiency and generalization performance. Jian et al.  also   datasets. However, due to their purely data-driven learning
                                                      80
            employed a combination of bidirectional LSTM and transfer   approach, the relationship itself remains a black box,
            learning to predict the behavior of CFRP composites in the   which may limit their ability to reflect physical phenomena
            very high cycle fatigue regime. In their approach, transfer   reliably. In contrast, PINNs integrate physical laws into the
            learning was applied to predict the fatigue behavior of a   neural network learning process, as shown in Figure 6A. 87,88
            new batch by leveraging existing experimental data. An   PINNs do not require any labeled (input-to-output) data
            attention mechanism was incorporated to focus on critical   for training, and the governing partial differential equation
            segments of the fatigue curve, such as regions with abrupt   (PDE),  as  well  as  initial  and  boundary  conditions  that
            changes,  thereby  improving  prediction  accuracy  and   describe the process being modeled, are used to train the
            convergence speed. However, attention mechanisms, while   neural network.
            advantageous for highly complex, imbalanced, or long-
            dependency data, may lead to overfitting and increased   In the case of composite materials, solving the various
            computational time when  applied  to low-complexity  or   PDEs that describe the elastic behavior, heat transfer,
            relatively uniform data.  Therefore, careful consideration   and damage or fracture models through FEA is time-
                               78
            of the characteristics of the data is essential when applying   consuming, and ML-based predictions often fail to
            attention mechanisms. As shown in Figure 5E, El Said    reflect real physical phenomena. In contrast, predictions
                                                         68
            employed a deep recurrent CNN that combines CNN    generated by PINNs can be consistent with the specified
            and  LSTM  to  predict  the  nonlinear  damage  behavior   physical laws, even outside the training domain, making
            of laminated composite structures. In  particular, since   PINNs a powerful tool for efficiently predicting complex
            features such as layup configuration, wrinkles, and ply   phenomena in composites research, such as plastic
            gaps exhibit spatial characteristics, a CNN was used to   deformation, flow  through  porous  media,  and  heat


            Volume 2 Issue 3 (2025)                         9                         doi: 10.36922/IJAMD025210016
   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20