Page 121 - IJB-10-1
P. 121

International Journal of Bioprinting                              Droplet-based bioprinting of tumor spheroids



















































            Figure 3. Fabrication of distinct types of spheroids associated with different parts of the human body by droplet-based bioprinting. (A) Images of
            neuroblastoma spheroid. Reproduced with permission from Utama et al. , 2020, iScience. (B)  Fluorescent image of an REC spheroid. Reproduced with
                                                           74
            permission from Trondle et al. , 2021, Biofabrication. (C) Fluorescent image of a liver tumor spheroid composed of HepG2 cells and EA.hy 926 cells.
                                76
            Reproduced with permission from Hong et al. , 2021, Adv Mater. (D) Immunostaining images of spheroids composed of 60 HepG2 cells and 40 HSC cells.
                                         80
            Reproduced with permission from Zhang et al. , 2022, Biofabrication. (E) Images of hESCs spheroids. The diameter of spheroids was in positive correlation
                                         81
            with cell concentration. Reproduced with permission from Faulkner-Jones et al. , 2013, Biofabrication. (F) Phase-contrast image and calcein and ethidium
                                                              42
            bromide staining image of a breast tumor spheroid. Reproduced with permission from Ling et al. , 2015, Engineering. (G) Confocal microscopy image
                                                                           86
            of a SW620 spheroid (G-I), red = actin (TRITC-phalloidin), blue = cell nuclei (DAPI). Histological section of a SW620 spheroid (G-II), green = hypoxic
            region (HypoxyProbe), blue = cell nuclei (DAPI). Reproduced with permission from Johnson et al. , 2022, Biofabrication. (H) Image of (CAL27)–CAFs
                                                                           87
            co-culture microtissues. Reproduced with permission from Chen et al. , 2021, Lab Chip.
                                                         46
            Liver cancer is one of the five most common cancers in   microfluidic bioprinting technology.  Specifically, the
                                                                                              80
            the world. Liver tissue has a complex cell composition;   bioink was extruded from the inner co-axial capillary
            nowadays, HepG2, SMMC-7721, Hep3B, and J5 cells are   orifice and sheared by mineral oil to form droplets
            the main primary cell lines utilized for fabrication of liver   containing cells. They found that the diameter of printed
                            77
            tumor tissue in vitro.  In liver organs, hepatic stellate cells   spheroids rapidly decreased during culture for 10 h and
            (HSCs) are responsible for maintaining liver metabolic   remain plateaued afterward.
            function and account for  ~8% of the  composition  of a
            liver.  When the liver is damaged, HSCs are activated to   Cell viability of structured spheroids was above 90%
                78
            transform into myofibroblast-like cells (MFC), leading   after 7-day culture. They fabricated uniform spheroids
                                                                                                 7
            to inflammation and  even fibrosis.  Therefore, they   composed of HepG2/C3A cells (5 × 10  cells/ml) and
                                           79
                                                                                               7
            are important co-cultured components for liver tumor   endothelial cells (EA.hy 926) (5 × 10  cells/ml) with a
            tissue. Hong et al. developed a bioprinter using capillary   diameter of ~250 μm (Figure 3C) in a high-throughput
            Volume 10 Issue 1 (2024)                       113                          https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.1214
   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126