Page 469 - IJB-10-1
P. 469

International Journal of Bioprinting                                               TPMS bone scaffold



































            Figure 1. Experimental schematic overview of the study. The preparation process of the TPMS scaffold loaded with I-PRF and SDF-1 (SIT) bone scaffold
            materials, in vitro experiments, and in vivo validation within a rabbit model. Abbreviations: I-PRF, injectable platelet-rich fibrin; SDF-1, stromal cell-
            derived factor-1.
            porosity and interconnectivity. Compared to traditional   scaffold loaded with I-PRF and SDF-1 exhibited good bone
            scaffolds, TPMS scaffolds are generated using mathematical   conduction, osteogenic activity, and angiogenesis in vitro,
            equations and manufactured through 3D printing     and promoted bone tissue and vascular regeneration in a
            technology, in which the manufacturing process is simple   rabbit mandible defect by releasing multiple growth factors
            and reproducible. Moreover, due to its unique structure,   (Figure 1).
            it has the characteristics of stress shielding and high
            specific stiffness, which can reduce stress concentration   2. Materials and methods
                                         40
            and increase mechanical strength.  In terms of bone   2.1. Scaffold fabrication
            repair, it not only exhibits good biocompatibility and the   TPMS bone scaffolds were designed by Professor Shengfa
            ability to mimic host tissues but has also been shown to   Wang of Dalian University of Technology using Matlab
            promote bone growth 40,41  in addition to being conducive   R2020a software. The scaffold appeared as a cylinder with
            to cell attachment and migration, bone repair, and bone   a diameter of 8 mm and a thickness of 5 mm at the bottom.
                      42
            regeneration.  The scaffold also promotes angiogenesis,   The pore size in the bone scaffold was controlled by
            which is conducive to wound repair. In comparison to   adjusting the period of the three-period minimal curved
            traditional scaffolds, TPMS bone scaffolds have been   surface structure. The wall thickness of the four groups
            shown in a study to guide cells toward osteogenesis through   of samples was 200 µm. The STL digital model files were
            directional bending at the cell level and showed significant   exported through Magics 21.0 software. The 3D printer
            and quantifiable improvement in bone regeneration. 43
                                                               based on digital laser processing technology was used, as
               In order to meet the treatment needs of patients with   shown in Figure 1. Based on the STL file exported from the
            mandibular defects, we developed a three-cycle minimal   three-cycle minimal surface structure, it contained 85%
            curved biomimetic bone tissue engineering scaffold in this   of the photocurable monomer β-tricalcium phosphate,
            study. The scaffold was modified with I-PRF and SDF-1   and 15% hydroxyapatite was added to manufacture the
            based on the fact that I-PRF is rich in various growth factors,   three-cycle minimal curved porous ceramic scaffold
            and SDF-1 is conducive to the angiogenesis of the damaged   matching  the  experiment  requirements.  The  optimized
            site. Through 3D printing processing, the personalized   process parameters were light wavelength 405 nm, light
            scaffold matching the shape and size of the mandibular   spot size 50 µm, exposure time 6 s, exposure power 30
            defect was prepared. The composition and structure of   mW/cm , and layer thickness 25 µm. After printing,
                                                                      2
            the scaffold closely resemble natural cancellous bone. The   the sample was separated from the prototype platform,

            Volume 10 Issue 1 (2024)                       461                          https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.0153
   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472   473   474