Page 464 - IJB-10-1

International Journal of Bioprinting Efficacy of 3D-printed customized titanium implants

2. Yadroitsev I, Krakhmalev P, Yadroitsava I. Selective laser nonunion in a complex patient population. Clin Orthop
melting of Ti6A14V alloy for biomedical applications: Relat Res. 2016;474(10):2280-2299.
Temperature monitoring and microstructural evolution. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4955-4
J Alloys Compounds. 2014;583:404-409.
doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.08.183 13. McGarvey WC, Braly WG. Bone graft in hindfoot
arthrodesis: Allograft vs autograft. Orthopedics.
3. Mehboob H, Tarlochan F, Mehboob A, et al. A novel design, 1996;19(5):389-394.
analysis and 3D printing of Ti-6Al-4V alloy bio-inspired doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-19960501-08
porous femoral stem. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2020;31(9):78.
doi: 10.1007/s10856-020-06420-7 14. Mulligan RP, Adams SB Jr, Easley ME, DeOrio JK, Nunley
JA. Comparison of posterior approach with intramedullary
4. Tan XP, Tan YJ, Chow CSL, Tor SB, Yeong WY. Metallic nailing versus lateral transfibular approach with fixed-angle
powder-bed based 3D printing of cellular scaffolds plating for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int.
for orthopaedic implants: A state-of-the-art review on 2017;38(12):1343-1351.
manufacturing, topological design, mechanical properties doi: 10.1177/1071100717731728
and biocompatibility. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl.
2017;76:1328-1343. 15. Fan J, Zhang X, Luo Y, You GW, Ng WK, Yang YF.
doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2017.02.094 Tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis with reverse PHILOS
plate and medial cannulated screws with lateral approach.
5. Giovinco NA, Dunn SP, Dowling L, et al. A novel BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18(1):317.
combination of printed 3‐dimensional anatomic templates doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1666-2
and computer‐assisted surgical simulation for virtual
preoperative planning in Charcot foot reconstruction. J Foot 16. Kreulen C, Lian E, Giza E. Technique for use of trabecular
Ankle Surg. 2012;51(3):387-393. metal spacers in tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with large
doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2012.01.014 bony defects. Foot Ankle Int. 2017;38(1):96-106.
doi: 10.1177/1071100716681743
6. Cha YH, Lee KH, Ryu HJ, et al. Ankle-foot orthosis made by
3D printing technique and automated design software. Appl 17. Li X, Wang CT, Zhang WG, Li Y. Fabrication and
Bionics Biomech. 2017; 9610468. characterization of porous Ti6Al4V parts for biomedical
doi: 10.1155/2017/9610468 applications using electron beam melting process.
J Materials Letters. 2009;63:403-405.
7. Chung KJ, Hong DY, Kim YT, Yang Ik, Park YW, Kim doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2008.10.065
HN. Preshaping plates for minimally invasive fixation of
calcaneal fractures using a real‐size 3D‐printed model 18. Hrabe NW, Heinl P, Bordia RK, Körner C, Fernandes RJ.
as a preoperative and intraoperative tool. Foot Ankle Int. Maintenance of a bone collagen phenotype by osteoblast-
2014;35(11):1231-1236. like cells in 3D periodic porous titanium (Ti-6Al-4 V)
doi: 10.1177/1071100714544522 structures fabricated by selective electron beam melting.
Connect Tissue Res. 2013;54(6):351-360.
8. Hamid KS, Parekh SG, Adams SB. Salvage of severe foot
and ankle trauma with a 3D printed scaffold. Foot Ankle Int. doi: 10.3109/03008207.2013.822864
2016;37(4):433-439. 19. Heinl P, Müller L, Körner C, Singer RF, Müller FA. Cellular
doi: 10.1177/1071100715620895 Ti-6Al-4V structures with interconnected macro porosity
9. Jastifer JR, Gustafson PA. Three-dimensional printing and for bone implants fabricated by selective electron beam
surgical simulation for preoperative planning of deformity melting. Acta Biomater. 2008;4(5):1536-1544.
correction in foot and ankle surgery. J Foot Ankle Surg. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.03.013
2017;56(1):191-195. 20. Diment LE, Thompson MS, Bergmann JHM. Clinical
doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2016.01.052 efficacy and effectiveness of 3D printing: A systematic
10. Ren X, Yang L, Duan XJ. Three‐dimensional printing in review. BMJ Open. 2017;7(12):e016891.
the surgical treatment of osteoid osteoma of the calcaneus: doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016891
A case report. J Int Med Res. 2017;45(1):372-380. 21. Zheng W, Tao Z, Lou Y, et al. Comparison of the conventional
doi: 10.1177/0300060516686514 surgery and the surgery assisted by 3D printing technology
11. Li H, Qu X, Mao Y, Dai K, Zhu Z. Custom acetabular cages in the treatment of calcaneal fractures. J Invest Surg.
offer stable fixation and improved hip scores for revision 2017;19:1-11.
THA with severe bone defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2017.1363833
2016;474(3):731-740. 22. Ma H, Luo J, Sun Z, et al. 3D printing of biomaterials with
doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4587-0
mussel-inspired nanostructures for tumor therapy and
12. Gorman TM, Beals TC, Nickisch F, et al. Hindfoot arthrodesis tissue regeneration. Biomaterials. 2016;111:138-148.
with the blade plate: Increased risk of complications and doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.10.005

Volume 10 Issue 1 (2024) 456 https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.0125