Page 56 - IJB-10-1
P. 56

International Journal of Bioprinting                                     Microfluidic-assisted 3D bioprinting




               Microfluidic technologies have encouraged the creation   fibers, which serve as building blocks for manufacturing
            of innovative approaches for fiber spinning. Microfluidic   functional tridimensional bioconstructs.  In this
                                                                                                   12
            spinning technology (MST) is an advanced method to   context, research on microfluidics is expanding toward
            fabricate microfibers made of biocompatible materials.   tissue engineering applications, assisting the generation
            The technology relies on microchannels to confine   of valuable tools to bioprint functional macrotissues.
            liquid material precursors and promote gelation prior to   Conveying the advantages of both techniques, such hybrid
            extrusion, which then occurs by forcing bioinks through   strategy allows for the versatile spatiotemporal patterning
            a small aperture called spinneret or nozzle. MST offers an   of fibers as well as the control of multiple bioink deposition
            increased level of versatility and sophistication compared   for the production of sophisticated 3D structures. The
            to other conventional fiber spinning techniques. 3,4  relatively large scale of microchannels diameter (in the
                                                               range of 100 µm) required to manipulate biomaterial
               Biocompatible fibers can be laden with living   inks—that are thick and often contain living cells—
            cells, enabling cell interaction with the surrounding   within microfluidic devices allows to benefit from recent
            biomaterial, proliferation, and differentiation in a quasi-  innovative microfabrication strategies, which provide
            three-dimensional (3D) environment, superior to two-  valuable alternatives to photolithography, offering higher
            dimensional (2D) culture systems in terms of biomimicry.   efficiency albeit in most cases lower resolution.
            However, MST is limited by poor control in spatial
            arrangement and  a  lack  of  macroscopic  manufacturing   Starting from recent approaches for microfluidic device
            ability. The  in vitro models obtained result in elongated   fabrication, which now enable to create microdevices
            entangled filaments that fall short of replicating the   in a fast and convenient manner, this review will discuss
            intricate 3D architecture of native tissues.       how the integration of MST is transforming the tissue
                                                               engineering and regenerative medicine (TERM) field.
               Nevertheless, tissue engineering, which aims to create   After presenting general information about desirable
            3D tissues that accurately mimic tissue functionalities  for   biomaterial characteristics and a theoretical model of
                                                      5,6
            regenerative medicine and disease modeling purposes,    microfiber formation applicable to most MST strategies,
                                                        9,10
                             7,8
            has significantly benefitted from the development of MST.   the latest experimental results will be discussed. An insight
            As depicted in  Figure 1, the strategic incorporation of   into current advances both in pure fiber spinning and
            microfluidic spinning systems on additive manufacturing   MST coupling with 3D printing systems (conventional
            machines, e.g., 3D bioprinters, fosters the fabrication   3D microfluidic bioprinting, c3DMB) is also given.
                                                     11
            of advanced spatially-organized  in vitro models.  This   Close  attention  will  be  given  to  monolithic  microfluidic
            coupling via microfluidic operators, such as mixers   platforms, referred to as advanced 3D microfluidic
            and filters, enables to control the microarchitecture of   bioprinting (a3DMB) systems.




























            Figure 1. Overview of the microfluidic-assisted 3D bioprinting for the development of functional 3D tissue models. Since laminar flow regime enables
            fluid handling with extreme accuracy, microfluidic tools allow to perform diverse operations over the bioink, controlling the micromorphology and the
            functionality of spun fibers to create more reliable in vitro tissue models.


            Volume 10 Issue 1 (2024)                        48                          https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.1404
   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61