Page 120 - IJB-10-3

International Journal of Bioprinting 3D bioprinting for vascularized skin tissue engineering

119. Parmaksiz M, Elçin AE, Elçin YM. Decellularized bSIS- 131. Zhang X, Li J, Ye P, Gao G, Hubbell K, Cui X. Coculture
ECM as a regenerative biomaterial for skin wound repair. of mesenchymal stem cells and endothelial cells enhances
Skin Stem Cell Methods Protoc. 2019:175-185. host tissue integration and epidermis maturation
doi: 10.1007/7651_2018_147 through AKT activation in gelatin methacryloyl
hydrogel-based skin model. Acta Biomater. 2017;59:
120. Abaci A, Guvendiren M. Designing decellularized
extracellular matrix‐based bioinks for 3D bioprinting. Adv 317-326.
Healthc Mater. 2020;9(24):2000734. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.07.001
doi: 10.1002/adhm.202000734 132. Baltazar T, Merola J, Catarino C, et al. Three dimensional
121. Velasco D, Quílez C, Garcia M, del Cañizo JF, Jorcano JL. 3D bioprinting of a vascularized and perfusable skin graft using
human skin bioprinting: a view from the bio side. J 3D Print human keratinocytes, fibroblasts, pericytes, and endothelial
Med. 2018:141-162. cells. Tissue Eng Part A. 2020;26(5-6):227-238.
doi: 10.2217/3dp-2018-0008 doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2019.0201
122. Hayden P, Ayehunie S, Jackson G, et al. In vitro skin equivalent 133. Kolesky DB, Homan KA, Skylar-Scott MA, Lewis JA. Three-
models for toxicity testing. In: Alternative Toxicological dimensional bioprinting of thick vascularized tissues. Proc
Methods. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2003:229-247. Natl Acad Sci. 2016;113(12):3179-3184.
doi: 10.1201/9780203008799.ch20 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1521342113
123. Schmook FP, Meingassner JG, Billich A. Comparison of 134. Ng WL, Qi JTZ, Yeong WY, Naing MW. Proof-of-concept:
human skin or epidermis models with human and animal 3D bioprinting of pigmented human skin constructs.
skin in in-vitro percutaneous absorption. Int J Pharm. Biofabrication. 2018;10(2):025005.
2001;215(1-2):51-56. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/aa9e1e
doi: 10.1016/s0378-5173(00)00665-7 135. Ma J, Qin C, Wu J, et al. 3D printing of strontium silicate
124. Almeida A, Sarmento B, Rodrigues F. Insights on in vitro microcylinder‐containing multicellular biomaterial inks
models for safety and toxicity assessment of cosmetic for vascularized skin regeneration. Adv Healthc Mater.
ingredients. Int J Pharm. 2017;519(1-2):178-185. 2021;10(16):2100523.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.01.024 doi: 10.1002/adhm.202100523
125. Liebsch M, Grune B, Seiler A, et al. Alternatives to animal 136. Heinemann S, Coradin T, Desimone MF. Bio-inspired
testing: current status and future perspectives. Arch Toxicol. silica–collagen materials: applications and perspectives in
2011;85:841-858. the medical field. Biomater Sci. 2013;1(7):688-702.
doi: 10.1007/s00204-011-0718-x doi: 10.1039/c3bm00014a
126. Yanez M, Rincon J, Dones A, De Maria C, Gonzales R, 137. Desimone MF, Hélary C, Mosser G, Giraud-Guille M-M,
Boland T. In vivo assessment of printed microvasculature in Livage J, Coradin T. Fibroblast encapsulation in hybrid
a bilayer skin graft to treat full-thickness wounds. Tissue Eng silica–collagen hydrogels. J Mater Chem. 2010;20(4):
Part A. 2015;21(1-2):224-233. 666-668.
doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2013.0561 doi: 10.1039/B921572G
127. Kim BS, Gao G, Kim JY, Cho DW. 3D cell printing of 138. Desimone MF, Hélary C, Rietveld IB, et al. Silica–collagen
perfusable vascularized human skin equivalent composed bionanocomposites as three-dimensional scaffolds for
of epidermis, dermis, and hypodermis for better fibroblast immobilization. Acta Biomater. 2010;6(10):
structural recapitulation of native skin. Adv Healthc Mater. 3998-4004.
2019;8(7):1801019. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.05.014
doi: 10.1002/adhm.201801019 139. Pouroutzidou GK, Liverani L, Theocharidou A, et al.
128. Abaci HE, Coffman A, Doucet Y, et al. Tissue engineering Synthesis and characterization of mesoporous mg-and
of human hair follicles using a biomimetic developmental sr-doped nanoparticles for moxifloxacin drug delivery in
approach. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):5301. promising tissue engineering applications. Int J Mol Sci.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07579-y 2021;22(2):577.
doi: 10.3390/ijms22020577
129. Pontiggia L, Van Hengel IA, Klar A, et al. Bioprinting and
plastic compression of large pigmented and vascularized 140. Mao L, Xia L, Chang J, et al. The synergistic effects of Sr
human dermo-epidermal skin substitutes by means of a new and Si bioactive ions on osteogenesis, osteoclastogenesis
robotic platform. J Tissue Eng. 2022;13:20417314221088513. and angiogenesis for osteoporotic bone regeneration. Acta
doi: 10.1177/20417314221088513 Biomater. 2017;61:217-232.
doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.015
130. Naomi R, Ridzuan PM, Bahari H. Current insights into
collagen type I. Polymers. 2021;13(16):2642. 141. Dikici S, Claeyssens F, MacNeil S. Bioengineering vascular
doi: 10.3390/polym13162642 networks to study angiogenesis and vascularization of

Volume 10 Issue 3 (2024) 112 doi: 10.36922/ijb.1727