Page 163 - IJB-10-3
P. 163

International Journal of Bioprinting                                           3D bone: Current & future

































                           Figure 8. Material extrusion-based 3D bioprinting techniques. This figure was created using BioRender.


            Table 4. Comparison of 3D bioprinting techniques
             Parameter/category     Material extrusion  Material jetting  Laser            VAP
             Resolution             Medium             High              High              High
             Material viscosity (mPa·s)  30–36 × 10   7  3.5–12          1–300             No limitation
             Cell density           High               Low               Medium            High
             Materials              Wide range of materials   Wide range of materials   Wide range of materials   Only photocurable
                                    printed via several   printed via several   printed via ionic   materials
                                    crosslinking methods  crosslinking methods  crosslinking methods
             Print speed            Slow               Fast              Medium            Fast
             Cost                   Medium             Low               High              Low
             Advantages             Wide range of bioinks;   Fast printing process; less  High resolution; wide   Fast printing process; high
                                    low cost; high cell density  cell damage; low cost;   range of bioinks  cell density; no specific
                                                       precise cell positioning            limitation in hydrogel
                                                                                           rheological properties
             Disadvantages          Limited resolution; slow   Limited cell density  High cost; complicated   Limited hydrogel
                                    printing process; limited            operation         possibilities
                                    hydrogel rheology
            Abbreviation: VAP: Vat polymerization.


            electrohydrodynamic, microvalve-operated, acoustic, and   syringe, from which droplets are generated at a nozzle
            laser-assisted bioprinting  (LAB) (Figure 9).  The main   using an actuator driven by thermal, piezoelectric,
                                                38
            advantages of material jetting-based bioprinting are its low   or electrostatic forces. Inkjet bioprinting is favored
            cost, fast printing speed, and high resolution. However, the cell   due to its affordability among droplet bioprinting
            density and viscosity of the hydrogels are limited (Table 4).     techniques. Additionally, commercial bioprinters
                                                         39
            The categories of material jetting-based bioprinting are   can be equipped with thermal, piezoelectric, or
            described as follows:                                   electrostatic heads. However, a major drawback of
            (i)   Inkjet bioprinting: Inkjet bioprinting uses the drop-  this technology is the frequent occurrence of nozzle
                 on-demand technique,  where the layers are printed   clogging. In thermal inkjet bioprinters, a small
                                   40
                 dropwise.  The hydrogel is loaded into a cartridge or   heating  unit  raises  the  temperature  to  100–300°C
                        41
            Volume 10 Issue 3 (2024)                       155                                doi: 10.36922/ijb.2056
   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168